Influence of different treatment modalities on the sexual function of breast cancer survivors: An observational ambispective study.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Natalia Camejo Martinez, Cecilia Castillo Leska, María Rosina Servetto Martinez, Miriam Gianina Muñoz Arce, Joaquín Manzanares Cuevas, Dahiana Lourdes Amarillo Hernández, María Gabriela Guerrina Valeta, Guadalupe Rocío Herrera Álvarez, María Carolina Dörner Cabrera, Gabriel David Krygier Waltier
{"title":"Influence of different treatment modalities on the sexual function of breast cancer survivors: An observational ambispective study.","authors":"Natalia Camejo Martinez, Cecilia Castillo Leska, María Rosina Servetto Martinez, Miriam Gianina Muñoz Arce, Joaquín Manzanares Cuevas, Dahiana Lourdes Amarillo Hernández, María Gabriela Guerrina Valeta, Guadalupe Rocío Herrera Álvarez, María Carolina Dörner Cabrera, Gabriel David Krygier Waltier","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.04.3045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advances in treatment have improved the survival rates of patients diagnosed with breast cancer. However, the number of women experiencing long-term consequences has also increased, affecting their quality of life, including sexual function.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the prevalence of sexual dysfunction as measured by the Female Sexual Function Index, its association with treatment modalities in Uruguayan breast cancer survivors, and to compare the questionnaire scores by age group (50 years or older versus under 50 years).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This ambispective observational study included patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer (I to III) who had completed surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy treatments at least 12 months before inclusion. Patients completed the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire, and the data were analyzed using simple and multiple binary logistic models to assess the relationship between treatment modalities and sexual dysfunction. Additionally, differences in Female Sexual Function Index scores between age groups were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 149 patients were included; 67.1% underwent breast-conserving surgery, 68.5% received chemotherapy, 92.6% radiotherapy, and 95.3% hormone therapy. Sexual dysfunction, defined as a score ≤ 26.55 on the questionnaire, was present in 58.3% of patients. Multivariate analysis indicated a higher risk of sexual dysfunction in patients who underwent total mastectomy, were treated with chemotherapy, or used gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although this study highlights the impact of certain treatment modalities on sexual function, the results should be interpreted considering the characteristics of the population and potential biases. These findings can guide clinicians in planning treatments to improve the quality of life of sexually active breast cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 4","pages":"e3045"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medwave","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2025.04.3045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Advances in treatment have improved the survival rates of patients diagnosed with breast cancer. However, the number of women experiencing long-term consequences has also increased, affecting their quality of life, including sexual function.

Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of sexual dysfunction as measured by the Female Sexual Function Index, its association with treatment modalities in Uruguayan breast cancer survivors, and to compare the questionnaire scores by age group (50 years or older versus under 50 years).

Methods: This ambispective observational study included patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer (I to III) who had completed surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy treatments at least 12 months before inclusion. Patients completed the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire, and the data were analyzed using simple and multiple binary logistic models to assess the relationship between treatment modalities and sexual dysfunction. Additionally, differences in Female Sexual Function Index scores between age groups were analyzed.

Results: A total of 149 patients were included; 67.1% underwent breast-conserving surgery, 68.5% received chemotherapy, 92.6% radiotherapy, and 95.3% hormone therapy. Sexual dysfunction, defined as a score ≤ 26.55 on the questionnaire, was present in 58.3% of patients. Multivariate analysis indicated a higher risk of sexual dysfunction in patients who underwent total mastectomy, were treated with chemotherapy, or used gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.

Conclusions: Although this study highlights the impact of certain treatment modalities on sexual function, the results should be interpreted considering the characteristics of the population and potential biases. These findings can guide clinicians in planning treatments to improve the quality of life of sexually active breast cancer patients.

不同治疗方式对乳腺癌幸存者性功能的影响:一项观察性双视角研究。
导读:治疗的进步提高了乳腺癌患者的生存率。然而,经历长期后果的妇女人数也有所增加,影响了她们的生活质量,包括性功能。目的:评估女性性功能指数测量的性功能障碍的患病率及其与乌拉圭乳腺癌幸存者治疗方式的关系,并按年龄组(50岁或以上与50岁以下)比较问卷得分。方法:这项双侧观察性研究纳入了诊断为早期乳腺癌(I至III)的患者,这些患者在入组前至少12个月完成了手术、化疗和放疗。患者填写女性性功能指数问卷,采用单、多元二元logistic模型对数据进行分析,评估治疗方式与性功能障碍的关系。此外,还分析了不同年龄组女性性功能指数得分的差异。结果:共纳入149例患者;保乳手术占67.1%,化疗占68.5%,放疗占92.6%,激素治疗占95.3%。58.3%的患者存在性功能障碍,定义为问卷得分≤26.55分。多因素分析表明,接受全乳切除术、化疗或使用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂的患者发生性功能障碍的风险更高。结论:虽然这项研究强调了某些治疗方式对性功能的影响,但研究结果应该考虑到人群的特点和潜在的偏见来解释。这些发现可以指导临床医生制定治疗计划,以提高性活跃乳腺癌患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medwave
Medwave MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medwave is a peer-reviewed, biomedical and public health journal. Since its foundation in 2001 (Volume 1) it has always been an online only, open access publication that does not charge subscription or reader fees. Since January 2011 (Volume 11, Number 1), all articles are peer-reviewed. Without losing sight of the importance of evidence-based approach and methodological soundness, the journal accepts for publication articles that focus on providing updates for clinical practice, review and analysis articles on topics such as ethics, public health and health policy; clinical, social and economic health determinants; clinical and health research findings from all of the major disciplines of medicine, medical science and public health. The journal does not publish basic science manuscripts or experiments conducted on animals. Until March 2013, Medwave was publishing 11-12 numbers a year. Each issue would be posted on the homepage on day 1 of each month, except for Chile’s summer holiday when the issue would cover two months. Starting from April 2013, Medwave adopted the continuous mode of publication, which means that the copyedited accepted articles are posted on the journal’s homepage as they are ready. They are then collated in the respective issue and included in the Past Issues section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信