Comparison of Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycle vs. Conservative Rehabilitation on Functional Status and Muscle Features in Stroke Patients.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1177/10538135241304334
Zeynep Şafak İbişoğlu, Serdar Kilinc
{"title":"Comparison of Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycle vs. Conservative Rehabilitation on Functional Status and Muscle Features in Stroke Patients.","authors":"Zeynep Şafak İbişoğlu, Serdar Kilinc","doi":"10.1177/10538135241304334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundFunctional Electrical Stimulation (FES) Cycle is used in the rehabilitation of stroke.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to investigate the effects of CR and FES cycle therapy on the functional status and muscle features in stroke patientsMethodsThe 1st Group(n = 15) received only CR for 6 weeks, and the 2nd Group(n = 15) received FES cycle 3 days a week for 4 weeks in addition to the CR treatment. Brunnstrom recovery staging(BRS), Fugl-Meyer lower extremity evaluation(FME); Berg Balance Scale(BBS), Functional Ambulation Classification(FAC), Barthel Index(BI), Fatigue Severity Scale(FSS), 6 min walk test(6mWT), knee extensor and knee flexor muscle strengths(KEMS, KFMS) in both groups were assessed before and after treatment(6th week). Pennate angle(PA) and rectus femoris muscle thickness(RFT) were measured.ResultsSignificant improvement was detected in BBS, FAS, BI, FME, 6mWT, KEMS, RFT scores after intra-group treatment compared to before treatment in both groups. Only the 2nd Group showed a significant difference in KFMS, FSS, BRS lower extremity, PA values after treatment compared to before. No significant superiority of the groups over each other was detected.ConclusionsCR and FES Cycle contribute to the improvement of the functional status of the patients, but their superiority over each other was not observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"56 2","pages":"207-218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135241304334","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundFunctional Electrical Stimulation (FES) Cycle is used in the rehabilitation of stroke.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to investigate the effects of CR and FES cycle therapy on the functional status and muscle features in stroke patientsMethodsThe 1st Group(n = 15) received only CR for 6 weeks, and the 2nd Group(n = 15) received FES cycle 3 days a week for 4 weeks in addition to the CR treatment. Brunnstrom recovery staging(BRS), Fugl-Meyer lower extremity evaluation(FME); Berg Balance Scale(BBS), Functional Ambulation Classification(FAC), Barthel Index(BI), Fatigue Severity Scale(FSS), 6 min walk test(6mWT), knee extensor and knee flexor muscle strengths(KEMS, KFMS) in both groups were assessed before and after treatment(6th week). Pennate angle(PA) and rectus femoris muscle thickness(RFT) were measured.ResultsSignificant improvement was detected in BBS, FAS, BI, FME, 6mWT, KEMS, RFT scores after intra-group treatment compared to before treatment in both groups. Only the 2nd Group showed a significant difference in KFMS, FSS, BRS lower extremity, PA values after treatment compared to before. No significant superiority of the groups over each other was detected.ConclusionsCR and FES Cycle contribute to the improvement of the functional status of the patients, but their superiority over each other was not observed.

功能电刺激周期与保守康复对脑卒中患者功能状态和肌肉特征的影响比较。
功能电刺激(FES)循环用于中风的康复。目的探讨CR和FES周期治疗对脑卒中患者功能状态和肌肉特征的影响。方法第一组(n = 15)只接受CR治疗6周,第二组(n = 15)在CR治疗的基础上接受FES周期治疗,每周3天,连续4周。Brunnstrom恢复分期(BRS)、Fugl-Meyer下肢评估(FME);治疗前后(第6周)对两组患者进行Berg平衡量表(BBS)、功能行走分级(FAC)、Barthel指数(BI)、疲劳程度量表(FSS)、6 min步行测试(6mWT)、膝关节伸肌、屈肌力量(KEMS、KFMS)评估。测量股骨矢状角(PA)和股直肌厚度(RFT)。结果两组患者治疗后BBS、FAS、BI、FME、6mWT、KEMS、RFT评分均较治疗前显著改善。仅第二组治疗后KFMS、FSS、下肢BRS、PA值较治疗前有显著差异。各组之间没有明显的优势。结论scr和FES循环均有助于改善患者的功能状态,但两者并无明显的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信