Assessment and management of midfoot osteoarthritis by podiatrists in Australia: a cross-sectional survey of current practice.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Polly Q X Lim, Hylton B Menz, Karl B Landorf, Michelle R Kaminski, Kade L Paterson, Shannon E Munteanu
{"title":"Assessment and management of midfoot osteoarthritis by podiatrists in Australia: a cross-sectional survey of current practice.","authors":"Polly Q X Lim, Hylton B Menz, Karl B Landorf, Michelle R Kaminski, Kade L Paterson, Shannon E Munteanu","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05881-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and disabling condition, yet lacks clinical guidelines for its assessment and management. This study aimed to investigate strategies used by Australian podiatrists to assess and manage midfoot OA. An exploratory cross-sectional survey of podiatrists working in Australia was conducted. Respondents were invited through professional organisations to complete an online questionnaire on their usual assessment and management practices for midfoot OA, based on a vignette. Between November 2022 and July 2023, 103 participants (52% women, mean age 40 years) with an average of 15 years of clinical experience responded. Physical assessments (including history taking and musculoskeletal assessments) (96%) and medical imaging (90%) were commonly used diagnostic methods, with palpation (96%), passive movement testing (95%) and x-ray imaging (62%) frequently reported. Associated impairments were assessed with range of motion testing of the midfoot (96%), gait analysis (95%), functional tests (83%), muscle strength (72%), and observation of static alignment (71%), including foot posture (69%). Most participants assessed comorbidities (93%), body composition (66%) and cognitive/psychosocial impairments (62%). Treatment approaches included footwear advice (97%), orthotic therapy (85%), strapping/taping (81%), education (79%), and exercise therapy (75%). One-third (34%) expected a 'satisfactory' treatment response within two months, and 36% would refer to another healthcare practitioner for co-management between two and three months if treatment was ineffective. A wide range of approaches are used to assess and manage midfoot OA. These findings have potential to inform the design of future studies in developing valid assessment approaches and effective interventions for this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 6","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12069427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05881-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and disabling condition, yet lacks clinical guidelines for its assessment and management. This study aimed to investigate strategies used by Australian podiatrists to assess and manage midfoot OA. An exploratory cross-sectional survey of podiatrists working in Australia was conducted. Respondents were invited through professional organisations to complete an online questionnaire on their usual assessment and management practices for midfoot OA, based on a vignette. Between November 2022 and July 2023, 103 participants (52% women, mean age 40 years) with an average of 15 years of clinical experience responded. Physical assessments (including history taking and musculoskeletal assessments) (96%) and medical imaging (90%) were commonly used diagnostic methods, with palpation (96%), passive movement testing (95%) and x-ray imaging (62%) frequently reported. Associated impairments were assessed with range of motion testing of the midfoot (96%), gait analysis (95%), functional tests (83%), muscle strength (72%), and observation of static alignment (71%), including foot posture (69%). Most participants assessed comorbidities (93%), body composition (66%) and cognitive/psychosocial impairments (62%). Treatment approaches included footwear advice (97%), orthotic therapy (85%), strapping/taping (81%), education (79%), and exercise therapy (75%). One-third (34%) expected a 'satisfactory' treatment response within two months, and 36% would refer to another healthcare practitioner for co-management between two and three months if treatment was ineffective. A wide range of approaches are used to assess and manage midfoot OA. These findings have potential to inform the design of future studies in developing valid assessment approaches and effective interventions for this condition.

评估和管理中足部骨关节炎的足科医生在澳大利亚:当前实践的横断面调查。
足中部骨关节炎(OA)是一种常见的致残疾病,但缺乏评估和治疗的临床指南。本研究旨在调查澳大利亚足科医生用于评估和管理足中部OA的策略。对在澳大利亚工作的足病医生进行了一项探索性横断面调查。通过专业机构邀请受访者完成一份基于小插图的在线问卷,调查他们对中足OA的通常评估和管理实践。在2022年11月至2023年7月期间,103名参与者(52%为女性,平均年龄40岁)平均有15年的临床经验。身体评估(包括病史和肌肉骨骼评估)(96%)和医学成像(90%)是常用的诊断方法,其中触诊(96%)、被动运动测试(95%)和x射线成像(62%)是常见的诊断方法。相关损伤通过中足活动范围测试(96%)、步态分析(95%)、功能测试(83%)、肌肉力量(72%)和静态对齐观察(71%),包括足部姿势(69%)来评估。大多数参与者评估了合并症(93%)、身体成分(66%)和认知/社会心理障碍(62%)。治疗方法包括鞋类建议(97%)、矫形治疗(85%)、绑带/胶带(81%)、教育(79%)和运动治疗(75%)。三分之一(34%)的人期望在两个月内获得“满意”的治疗反应,36%的人如果治疗无效,会在两到三个月内转诊给另一位保健医生共同管理。广泛的方法被用于评估和管理中足骨关节炎。这些发现有可能为未来的研究设计提供信息,以制定有效的评估方法和有效的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信