Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation - Comparison of intravesical versus extravesical techniques in the management of unilateral primary vesicoureteral reflux in children: Does approach matter?

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Anupam Shukla, Kunj B Patel, Himanshu Raj, Priyank Yadav, Mohammed Suleh Ansari
{"title":"Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation - Comparison of intravesical versus extravesical techniques in the management of unilateral primary vesicoureteral reflux in children: Does approach matter?","authors":"Anupam Shukla, Kunj B Patel, Himanshu Raj, Priyank Yadav, Mohammed Suleh Ansari","doi":"10.1177/03915603251321984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic extravesical and intravesical (transvesicoscopic) ureteral reimplantation are widely accepted procedures but there is limited literature on comparison of these techniques. This study compares the efficacy and outcomes of laparoscopic intravesical and extravesical ureteral reimplantation for unilateral primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed the case records of 62 children between ages of 1 and 18 years who underwent laparoscopic unilateral ureteral reimplantation at our institute between January 2019 and January 2023. Patients divided into two groups; those who underwent laparoscopic intravesical ureteric reimplantation were Group A and those who underwent laparoscopic extravesical ureteric reimplantation were Group B. We analysed the blood investigations, pre- and post-operative grade of reflux, operative time, complications, analgesic requirements, and pre- and post-operative nuclear scans. The success of surgery was defined as the resolution of VUR on voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) performed 6 months post operatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>24 patients were in Group A and 38 patients in Group B. The mean age and grades of reflux were comparable in the groups. The difference in operative time was statistically significant (Group A: 131.3 ± 30.4 min and Group B: 96 ± 20.4 min, <i>p</i> = 0.009). The success rate (95.8% vs 94.7%), complication rate (16.7% vs 15.7%), time to discharge (2.6 vs 3.3 days) of both group was comparable. Less analgesics were needed in intravesical group (186 vs 204 mg/kg) though it was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation by both extravesical and intravesical route is equally safe and effective with similar efficacy, outcome and comparable acceptable complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3915603251321984"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603251321984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/introduction: Laparoscopic extravesical and intravesical (transvesicoscopic) ureteral reimplantation are widely accepted procedures but there is limited literature on comparison of these techniques. This study compares the efficacy and outcomes of laparoscopic intravesical and extravesical ureteral reimplantation for unilateral primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analysed the case records of 62 children between ages of 1 and 18 years who underwent laparoscopic unilateral ureteral reimplantation at our institute between January 2019 and January 2023. Patients divided into two groups; those who underwent laparoscopic intravesical ureteric reimplantation were Group A and those who underwent laparoscopic extravesical ureteric reimplantation were Group B. We analysed the blood investigations, pre- and post-operative grade of reflux, operative time, complications, analgesic requirements, and pre- and post-operative nuclear scans. The success of surgery was defined as the resolution of VUR on voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) performed 6 months post operatively.

Results: 24 patients were in Group A and 38 patients in Group B. The mean age and grades of reflux were comparable in the groups. The difference in operative time was statistically significant (Group A: 131.3 ± 30.4 min and Group B: 96 ± 20.4 min, p = 0.009). The success rate (95.8% vs 94.7%), complication rate (16.7% vs 15.7%), time to discharge (2.6 vs 3.3 days) of both group was comparable. Less analgesics were needed in intravesical group (186 vs 204 mg/kg) though it was not statistically significant (p = 0.22).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation by both extravesical and intravesical route is equally safe and effective with similar efficacy, outcome and comparable acceptable complication rate.

腹腔镜输尿管再植术-膀胱内与膀胱外技术在治疗儿童单侧原发性膀胱输尿管反流中的比较:入路重要吗?
目的/介绍:腹腔镜输尿管膀胱外和膀胱内(经膀胱镜)输尿管再植是被广泛接受的手术,但关于这两种技术比较的文献有限。本研究比较了腹腔镜输尿管膀胱内和输尿管外再植术治疗儿童单侧原发性膀胱输尿管反流(VUR)的疗效和结果。材料和方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2023年1月在我院行腹腔镜单侧输尿管再植术的62例1 ~ 18岁儿童的病例记录。患者分为两组;A组为腹腔镜输尿管膀胱内再造术组,b组为腹腔镜输尿管膀胱外再造术组。我们分析了血液调查、术前和术后反流等级、手术时间、并发症、镇痛需求以及术前和术后核扫描。手术成功的标准是术后6个月进行的排尿膀胱尿道造影(VCUG)中VUR的消退。结果:A组24例,b组38例。两组患者的平均年龄和反流程度具有可比性。手术时间A组:131.3±30.4 min, B组:96±20.4 min, p = 0.009,差异有统计学意义。两组手术成功率(95.8% vs 94.7%)、并发症发生率(16.7% vs 15.7%)、出院时间(2.6 vs 3.3 d)具有可比性。膀胱内组所需镇痛药较少(186 vs 204 mg/kg),但无统计学意义(p = 0.22)。结论:腹腔镜输尿管膀胱外再植术和膀胱内再植术均安全有效,疗效、结局相似,可接受并发症发生率相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信