Development and Validation of the BQQ Questionnaire for Assessing Bronchoscopists' Perception of Single-use Flexible Bronchoscope Quality.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respiration Pub Date : 2025-04-29 DOI:10.1159/000546088
Javier Flandes, Lina V Cerchiaro-Torrado, Carlos Disdier, Javier Alfayate, Iker Fernandez-Navamuel, Carlos Augustí, Carmen M Lucena, Francisco Martinez-Muñiz, Virginia Pajares, Felipe Andreo, Carmen Centeno, Carmen Montero, Miguel Ariza, Eduardo Tuta-Quintero, Rocio Gallego, Alfons Torregó, Héctor González, Rosa Cordovilla, Blanca de Vega-Sanchez, Juan Cascón, J Javier García-López, Cristina L García-Gallo, Prudencio Díaz-Agero, Estefanía Luque-Crespo, María Pavón-Masa, Enrique Cases, José Robles, Ana María Uribe-Hernández, Luis F Giraldo-Cadavid
{"title":"Development and Validation of the BQQ Questionnaire for Assessing Bronchoscopists' Perception of Single-use Flexible Bronchoscope Quality.","authors":"Javier Flandes, Lina V Cerchiaro-Torrado, Carlos Disdier, Javier Alfayate, Iker Fernandez-Navamuel, Carlos Augustí, Carmen M Lucena, Francisco Martinez-Muñiz, Virginia Pajares, Felipe Andreo, Carmen Centeno, Carmen Montero, Miguel Ariza, Eduardo Tuta-Quintero, Rocio Gallego, Alfons Torregó, Héctor González, Rosa Cordovilla, Blanca de Vega-Sanchez, Juan Cascón, J Javier García-López, Cristina L García-Gallo, Prudencio Díaz-Agero, Estefanía Luque-Crespo, María Pavón-Masa, Enrique Cases, José Robles, Ana María Uribe-Hernández, Luis F Giraldo-Cadavid","doi":"10.1159/000546088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk of cross-infections (including SARS-Cov-2) and damage to the flexible bronchoscope has led to the development of single-use flexible bronchoscopes as a cost-effective alternative. It is necessary for the bronchoscopist to evaluate the perception of the quality of these devices to determine if their quality is satisfactory for the user.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Construction and validation of a Bronchoscope Quality Questionnaire (BQQ) to evaluate the quality of the flexible bronchoscope perceived by the bronchoscopist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study in 21 pulmonology centres in Spain. A first version of the BQQ was carried out by a group of experts, the construct validity was evaluated, and a factor analysis reduced the number of items. Feasibility of the BQQ was assessed by a questionnaire, internal consistency by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intra- and interrater reliability by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final version of the BQQ was composed of six domains and 18 items. The median completion time was five minutes, and it was not difficult to understand the items. Cronbach's alpha was 0.89, the intrarater ICC was 0.70 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.79), and the interrater ICC was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47 to 0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BQQ showed good feasibility, internal consistency and intra- and interrater reliability, which makes it suitable for evaluating the quality of flexible bronchoscopes perceived by the bronchoscopist.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The risk of cross-infections (including SARS-Cov-2) and damage to the flexible bronchoscope has led to the development of single-use flexible bronchoscopes as a cost-effective alternative. It is necessary for the bronchoscopist to evaluate the perception of the quality of these devices to determine if their quality is satisfactory for the user.

Objective: Construction and validation of a Bronchoscope Quality Questionnaire (BQQ) to evaluate the quality of the flexible bronchoscope perceived by the bronchoscopist.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 21 pulmonology centres in Spain. A first version of the BQQ was carried out by a group of experts, the construct validity was evaluated, and a factor analysis reduced the number of items. Feasibility of the BQQ was assessed by a questionnaire, internal consistency by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intra- and interrater reliability by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: The final version of the BQQ was composed of six domains and 18 items. The median completion time was five minutes, and it was not difficult to understand the items. Cronbach's alpha was 0.89, the intrarater ICC was 0.70 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.79), and the interrater ICC was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47 to 0.76).

Conclusion: The BQQ showed good feasibility, internal consistency and intra- and interrater reliability, which makes it suitable for evaluating the quality of flexible bronchoscopes perceived by the bronchoscopist.

评估支气管镜医师对一次性柔性支气管镜质量认知的BQQ问卷的编制与验证。
背景:交叉感染(包括SARS-Cov-2)和柔性支气管镜损伤的风险导致了一次性柔性支气管镜的发展,作为一种具有成本效益的替代方案。支气管镜医师有必要评估这些设备的质量,以确定它们的质量是否令用户满意。目的:构建并验证支气管镜质量问卷(BQQ),评价支气管镜医师对柔性支气管镜的感知质量。方法:我们在西班牙的21个肺科中心进行了横断面研究。由一组专家编制了BQQ的初版,评估了结构效度,并进行了因子分析,减少了项目数量。采用问卷评估BQQ的可行性,采用Cronbach’s alpha系数评估内部一致性,采用类内相关系数(ICC)评估组内信度和组间信度。结果:最终版BQQ由6个域和18个条目组成。平均完成时间为5分钟,理解这些项目并不困难。Cronbach's alpha为0.89,内部ICC为0.70 (95% CI 0.56 ~ 0.79),内部ICC为0.64 (95% CI 0.47 ~ 0.76)。结论:BQQ具有良好的可行性、内部一致性和内外信度,适用于评价支气管镜医师感知的柔性支气管镜质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiration
Respiration 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信