The communication experiences of persons referred to specialist palliative care services and their carers: A descriptive phenomenological study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Mohamad M Saab, Megan McCarthy, Varsha N Shetty, Mary Jane O'Leary, Josephine Hegarty, Fiona Kiely
{"title":"The communication experiences of persons referred to specialist palliative care services and their carers: A descriptive phenomenological study.","authors":"Mohamad M Saab, Megan McCarthy, Varsha N Shetty, Mary Jane O'Leary, Josephine Hegarty, Fiona Kiely","doi":"10.1017/S1478951525000422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Effective communication during specialist palliative care (PC) referral is linked to improved health outcomes. Initiating a conversation about PC is difficult and poor communication can lead to stigma. The aim of this descriptive phenomenological study was to explore the communication experiences of persons referred to specialist PC services and their carers and explore strategies to improve such experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Purposive sampling was used to recruit 17 participants who were either receiving specialist PC and/or caring for someone who was receiving specialist PC. Participants were recruited from a hospice. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified: (i) The why, who, what, when, where, and how of PC referral; (ii) initial thoughts and feelings about referral to PC; (iii) enhancing the communication of PC referral; and (iv) addressing practical needs during PC referral. Participants were referred either through their general practitioner or oncologist. Initially, participants linked PC referral to death. This perception changed when participants started availing of the services. Compassion, empathy, hope, privacy, in-person communication, individualized referral, and information dosing were identified as building blocks for effective communication. Participants stressed the importance of raising public awareness of PC and addressing the practical needs of individuals being referred.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>The communication of PC referral should be tailored to meet the individual needs of patients and carers. Delivering clear and simple information is important to help patients and carers understand and accept the referral.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951525000422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Effective communication during specialist palliative care (PC) referral is linked to improved health outcomes. Initiating a conversation about PC is difficult and poor communication can lead to stigma. The aim of this descriptive phenomenological study was to explore the communication experiences of persons referred to specialist PC services and their carers and explore strategies to improve such experiences.

Methods: Purposive sampling was used to recruit 17 participants who were either receiving specialist PC and/or caring for someone who was receiving specialist PC. Participants were recruited from a hospice. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted.

Results: Four themes were identified: (i) The why, who, what, when, where, and how of PC referral; (ii) initial thoughts and feelings about referral to PC; (iii) enhancing the communication of PC referral; and (iv) addressing practical needs during PC referral. Participants were referred either through their general practitioner or oncologist. Initially, participants linked PC referral to death. This perception changed when participants started availing of the services. Compassion, empathy, hope, privacy, in-person communication, individualized referral, and information dosing were identified as building blocks for effective communication. Participants stressed the importance of raising public awareness of PC and addressing the practical needs of individuals being referred.

Significance of results: The communication of PC referral should be tailored to meet the individual needs of patients and carers. Delivering clear and simple information is important to help patients and carers understand and accept the referral.

转介到专科缓和疗护服务的人士及其照护者的沟通经验:一项描述性现象学研究。
目的:在专家姑息治疗(PC)转诊期间有效的沟通与改善健康结果有关。发起一场关于个人电脑的对话是很困难的,糟糕的沟通会导致耻辱。本描述性现象学研究的目的是探讨被转介到专业个人电脑服务的人及其护理人员的沟通经验,并探讨改善这种经验的策略。方法:采用目的抽样方法招募17名接受专业PC和/或照顾正在接受专业PC的人的参与者。参与者是从一家临终关怀医院招募的。进行归纳主题分析。结果:确定了四个主题:(i)为什么,谁,什么,何时,何地以及如何进行PC转诊;(ii)转介至个人电脑的最初想法和感受;(iii)加强个人电脑转介的沟通;及(iv)处理个人电脑转介期间的实际需要。参与者通过他们的全科医生或肿瘤科医生转介。最初,参与者将PC转诊与死亡联系起来。当参与者开始使用这些服务时,这种看法发生了变化。同情心、同理心、希望、隐私、面对面交流、个性化转诊和信息剂量被认为是有效沟通的基石。嘉宾强调提高公众对个人电脑的认识,以及处理被转介人士的实际需要,十分重要。结果意义:PC转诊沟通应根据患者和护理人员的个性化需求进行调整。提供清晰和简单的信息对于帮助患者和护理人员理解和接受转诊非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信