Questioning the Addition of Fluoroquinolone on Mortality in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A multicenter study in Korea.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Se Ju Lee, Soyoon Hwang, Ji Hyun Yun, Yong Chan Kim, Min Joo Choi, Jin-Soo Lee, Ki Tae Kwon, Won Suk Choi, Yeseul Na, So Hee Kim, Taehyen Kim, Hyeri Seok, Bongyoung Kim
{"title":"Questioning the Addition of Fluoroquinolone on Mortality in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A multicenter study in Korea.","authors":"Se Ju Lee, Soyoon Hwang, Ji Hyun Yun, Yong Chan Kim, Min Joo Choi, Jin-Soo Lee, Ki Tae Kwon, Won Suk Choi, Yeseul Na, So Hee Kim, Taehyen Kim, Hyeri Seok, Bongyoung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jmii.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of fluoroquinolone (FQ) combination therapy as empirical treatment for severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate its clinical impact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted in seven large university-affiliated hospitals in Korea. It included adult inpatients (age ≥19 years) diagnosed with sCAP between March 2020 and February 2023, identified through third-ranked pneumonia codes, who received anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam (APBL) and/or FQ within 24 h of admission. Propensity-score matching compared monotherapy and combination therapy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 588 enrolled patients with sCAP, 177 per group were analyzed post-matching. No significant differences were found in all-cause in-hospital mortality (36.7 % vs. 36.2 %, P = 0.917), in-hospital mortality from pneumonia aggravation (29.9 % vs. 30.5 %, P = 1.000), or 30-day mortality (26.6 % vs. 29.4 %, P = 0.251). FQ combination therapy did not affect 30-day mortality significantly (P = 0.489). None of the variables significantly influenced 30-day mortality, pneumonia recurrence within 28 days, total antibiotic duration, or hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with sCAP, outcomes did not differ significantly between APBL monotherapy and FQ combination therapy. This suggests that even in severe CAP, an individualized treatment strategy based on the causative agent may be more appropriate than indiscriminate combination therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":56117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2025.04.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of fluoroquinolone (FQ) combination therapy as empirical treatment for severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate its clinical impact.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in seven large university-affiliated hospitals in Korea. It included adult inpatients (age ≥19 years) diagnosed with sCAP between March 2020 and February 2023, identified through third-ranked pneumonia codes, who received anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam (APBL) and/or FQ within 24 h of admission. Propensity-score matching compared monotherapy and combination therapy outcomes.

Results: Of 588 enrolled patients with sCAP, 177 per group were analyzed post-matching. No significant differences were found in all-cause in-hospital mortality (36.7 % vs. 36.2 %, P = 0.917), in-hospital mortality from pneumonia aggravation (29.9 % vs. 30.5 %, P = 1.000), or 30-day mortality (26.6 % vs. 29.4 %, P = 0.251). FQ combination therapy did not affect 30-day mortality significantly (P = 0.489). None of the variables significantly influenced 30-day mortality, pneumonia recurrence within 28 days, total antibiotic duration, or hospital stay.

Conclusions: In patients with sCAP, outcomes did not differ significantly between APBL monotherapy and FQ combination therapy. This suggests that even in severe CAP, an individualized treatment strategy based on the causative agent may be more appropriate than indiscriminate combination therapy.

韩国一项多中心研究:氟喹诺酮类药物对严重社区获得性肺炎死亡率的影响
背景:氟喹诺酮(FQ)联合治疗重度社区获得性肺炎(sCAP)的经验治疗尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们旨在评估其临床影响。方法:对韩国7所大型大学附属医院进行回顾性研究。该研究包括2020年3月至2023年2月期间诊断为sCAP的成年住院患者(年龄≥19岁),通过排名第三的肺炎代码识别,并在入院后24小时内接受抗假单胞菌β -内酰胺(APBL)和/或FQ治疗。倾向评分匹配比较单一治疗和联合治疗的结果。结果:在588例sCAP入组患者中,每组177例进行配对后分析。全因住院死亡率(36.7%比36.2%,P = 0.917)、肺炎加重住院死亡率(29.9%比30.5%,P = 1.000)和30天死亡率(26.6%比29.4%,P = 0.251)均无显著差异。FQ联合治疗对30天死亡率无显著影响(P = 0.489)。没有一个变量显著影响30天死亡率、28天内肺炎复发率、抗生素总使用时间或住院时间。结论:在sCAP患者中,APBL单药治疗和FQ联合治疗的结果无显著差异。这表明,即使在严重的CAP中,基于病原体的个体化治疗策略可能比不加区分的联合治疗更合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection is an open access journal, committed to disseminating information on the latest trends and advances in microbiology, immunology, infectious diseases and parasitology. Article types considered include perspectives, review articles, original articles, brief reports and correspondence. With the aim of promoting effective and accurate scientific information, an expert panel of referees constitutes the backbone of the peer-review process in evaluating the quality and content of manuscripts submitted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信