Clinical Effects of Weekly and Biweekly Low-Frequency Ultrasound Debridement Versus Standard of Wound Care in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sebastián Flores-Escobar, Yolanda García-Álvarez, Francisco Javier Álvaro-Afonso, Mateo López-Moral, Marta García-Madrid, José Luis Lázaro-Martínez
{"title":"Clinical Effects of Weekly and Biweekly Low-Frequency Ultrasound Debridement Versus Standard of Wound Care in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sebastián Flores-Escobar, Yolanda García-Álvarez, Francisco Javier Álvaro-Afonso, Mateo López-Moral, Marta García-Madrid, José Luis Lázaro-Martínez","doi":"10.1177/15347346251332795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical effects of weekly (UD/week) and biweekly (UD/2-weeks) low-frequency ultrasound debridement (UD) on wound healing, healing time, wound area, granulation tissue, and transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO<sub>2</sub>) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), compared to the standard of care (SoC). A pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted involving 30 patients with DFUs who received either UD/week (n = 10), UD/2-weeks (n = 11), or SoC (n = 9) every week over a 12-week treatment period. Healing rates at 6 months were 70% in the UD/week, 54.4% in the UD/2-weeks, and 33.3% in the SoC (<i>P</i> = .27). The healing times were 11 (IQR 7-19) weeks for UD/week, 18 (IQR 15-36) weeks for the SoC, and 24.5 (IQR 16-30) weeks for the UD/2-weeks group (<i>P</i> = .036). Wound area was reduced by 87.5 ± 18.5% in the UD/week, 68.6 ± 26.2% in the UD/2-weeks, and 38.9 ± 16.6% in the SoC (<i>P</i> = .014). Wollina wound scores were 7 (IQR 6-7) in the UD/week, 7 (IQR 6.5-7) in the UD/2-weeks, and 4 (IQR 3-6) in the SoC (<i>P</i> = .002). UD/week showed not significantly higher healing rates than the UD/2-weeks and SoC, but experienced significantly shorter healing time, a greater percentage of wound area reduction and higher Wollina wound score. These findings suggest that UD/week could be a valuable therapeutic option in clinical practice, particularly for patients in whom sharp debridement is not a viable option or who require an alternative approach to promote wound healing. This study is registered in ClinicalTrial.gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251332795"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251332795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical effects of weekly (UD/week) and biweekly (UD/2-weeks) low-frequency ultrasound debridement (UD) on wound healing, healing time, wound area, granulation tissue, and transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), compared to the standard of care (SoC). A pilot randomized clinical trial was conducted involving 30 patients with DFUs who received either UD/week (n = 10), UD/2-weeks (n = 11), or SoC (n = 9) every week over a 12-week treatment period. Healing rates at 6 months were 70% in the UD/week, 54.4% in the UD/2-weeks, and 33.3% in the SoC (P = .27). The healing times were 11 (IQR 7-19) weeks for UD/week, 18 (IQR 15-36) weeks for the SoC, and 24.5 (IQR 16-30) weeks for the UD/2-weeks group (P = .036). Wound area was reduced by 87.5 ± 18.5% in the UD/week, 68.6 ± 26.2% in the UD/2-weeks, and 38.9 ± 16.6% in the SoC (P = .014). Wollina wound scores were 7 (IQR 6-7) in the UD/week, 7 (IQR 6.5-7) in the UD/2-weeks, and 4 (IQR 3-6) in the SoC (P = .002). UD/week showed not significantly higher healing rates than the UD/2-weeks and SoC, but experienced significantly shorter healing time, a greater percentage of wound area reduction and higher Wollina wound score. These findings suggest that UD/week could be a valuable therapeutic option in clinical practice, particularly for patients in whom sharp debridement is not a viable option or who require an alternative approach to promote wound healing. This study is registered in ClinicalTrial.gov.

每周和双周低频超声清创与标准伤口护理对糖尿病足溃疡患者的临床效果:一项随机临床试验。
本研究的目的是评估每周(UD/周)和双周(UD/2周)低频超声清创(UD)对糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)患者伤口愈合、愈合时间、伤口面积、肉芽组织和经皮氧压(TcPO2)的临床影响,并与标准护理(SoC)进行比较。进行了一项随机临床试验,涉及30例DFUs患者,他们在12周的治疗期内每周接受UD/周(n = 10), UD/2周(n = 11)或SoC (n = 9)治疗。6个月的愈合率在UD/周为70%,UD/2周为54.4%,SoC为33.3% (P = 0.27)。UD/周组愈合时间为11 (IQR 7 ~ 19)周,SoC组为18 (IQR 15 ~ 36)周,UD/2周组为24.5 (IQR 16 ~ 30)周(P = 0.036)。UD/周创面面积减少87.5±18.5%,UD/2周创面面积减少68.6±26.2%,SoC创面面积减少38.9±16.6% (P = 0.014)。在UD/周时,Wollina伤口评分为7分(IQR 6 ~ 7分),在UD/2周时为7分(IQR 6.5 ~ 7分),在SoC时为4分(IQR 3 ~ 6分)(P = 0.002)。UD/周的愈合率不明显高于UD/2周和SoC,但愈合时间明显短,创面面积缩小百分比明显高,Wollina创面评分明显高。这些发现表明,在临床实践中,UD/week可能是一种有价值的治疗选择,特别是对于那些锐利清创不可行或需要其他方法促进伤口愈合的患者。这项研究已在ClinicalTrial.gov上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信