Sovereignty For Your Body: Acceptability of Sexual Victimization Risk Reduction Interventions among Indigenous College Students.

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Psychology of Violence Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1037/vio0000519
RaeAnn E Anderson, Ashley B Cole, Leslie D Unger, Cassidy Armstrong, Katherina Arteaga, Ashly Hanna, Savannah Pomani, Erin Morin, Reagan Cole
{"title":"Sovereignty For Your Body: Acceptability of Sexual Victimization Risk Reduction Interventions among Indigenous College Students.","authors":"RaeAnn E Anderson, Ashley B Cole, Leslie D Unger, Cassidy Armstrong, Katherina Arteaga, Ashly Hanna, Savannah Pomani, Erin Morin, Reagan Cole","doi":"10.1037/vio0000519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study is to understand what type of sexual violence risk reduction intervention programs and elements are acceptable to Indigenous college students via quantitative survey research methods.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>401 Indigenous college students (77.1% women, 19.7% men, 3.0% trans or Two Spirit) from across North America were recruited. Students read standardized descriptions of four different sexual victimization risk reduction interventions (SVRRIs) that ranged in characteristics and ranked the interventions. All students provided acceptability ratings for Flip the Script with Enhanced Assess, Acknowledge, Act (EAAA) and a program of their choice. Participants also rated the importance of specific intervention elements, including cultural content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants had a history of sexual victimization; 80.8% had been sexually victimized at some point in their life. The combined sexual violence and substance use reduction intervention (Sexual Assault Risk and Alcohol Use Reduction Program [SAARR]) was most frequently ranked as the first choice by 36.2% of the sample, <i>p</i> < 0.1. Considering acceptability ratings, all four SVRRIs were considered acceptable by most of the sample, with Flip the Script with EAAA rated highest of acceptability at 95.3% and Bringing in the Bystander having the lowest rate of acceptability at 71.4%. Cultural content was rated as a moderately important intervention element.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Indigenous college students are open to many different forms of sexual violence risk reduction interventions. Our findings suggest that simple cultural adaptations would be welcomed and scientifically supported to increase access and acceptability to violence interventions for Indigenous college students.</p>","PeriodicalId":47876,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Violence","volume":"15 2","pages":"224-234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12074610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000519","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study is to understand what type of sexual violence risk reduction intervention programs and elements are acceptable to Indigenous college students via quantitative survey research methods.

Method: 401 Indigenous college students (77.1% women, 19.7% men, 3.0% trans or Two Spirit) from across North America were recruited. Students read standardized descriptions of four different sexual victimization risk reduction interventions (SVRRIs) that ranged in characteristics and ranked the interventions. All students provided acceptability ratings for Flip the Script with Enhanced Assess, Acknowledge, Act (EAAA) and a program of their choice. Participants also rated the importance of specific intervention elements, including cultural content.

Results: Most participants had a history of sexual victimization; 80.8% had been sexually victimized at some point in their life. The combined sexual violence and substance use reduction intervention (Sexual Assault Risk and Alcohol Use Reduction Program [SAARR]) was most frequently ranked as the first choice by 36.2% of the sample, p < 0.1. Considering acceptability ratings, all four SVRRIs were considered acceptable by most of the sample, with Flip the Script with EAAA rated highest of acceptability at 95.3% and Bringing in the Bystander having the lowest rate of acceptability at 71.4%. Cultural content was rated as a moderately important intervention element.

Conclusions: Indigenous college students are open to many different forms of sexual violence risk reduction interventions. Our findings suggest that simple cultural adaptations would be welcomed and scientifically supported to increase access and acceptability to violence interventions for Indigenous college students.

你身体的主权:原住民大学生性受害风险降低干预的可接受性。
目的:本研究旨在透过定量调查研究方法,了解原住民族大学生可接受何种类型的性暴力风险降低干预方案及要素。方法:从北美各地招募401名原住民大学生(女性77.1%,男性19.7%,跨性别或双灵3.0%)。学生们阅读了四种不同的性受害风险降低干预措施(SVRRIs)的标准化描述,这些描述在特征上有所不同,并对干预措施进行了排名。所有学生都提供了“翻转脚本”的可接受度评级,包括增强评估、承认、行动(EAAA)和他们选择的项目。参与者还对包括文化内容在内的具体干预因素的重要性进行了评估。结果:大多数参与者有性侵害史;80.8%的人在一生中曾遭受过性侵害。性暴力和减少药物使用联合干预(性侵犯风险和酒精使用减少计划[SAARR])被36.2%的样本列为首选,p < 0.1。考虑到可接受程度,所有四种SVRRIs都被大多数样本认为是可接受的,其中EAAA的翻转脚本可接受程度最高,为95.3%,而引入旁观者的可接受程度最低,为71.4%。文化内容被评为中等重要的干预因素。结论:原住民大学生对许多不同形式的性暴力风险降低干预措施持开放态度。我们的研究结果表明,简单的文化适应将受到欢迎并得到科学支持,以增加土著大学生对暴力干预的获取和接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信