Adults interpret iconicity in speech and gesture via the same modality-independent process.

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Mingtong Li, Suzanne Aussems, Sotaro Kita
{"title":"Adults interpret iconicity in speech and gesture via the same modality-independent process.","authors":"Mingtong Li, Suzanne Aussems, Sotaro Kita","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02698-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Iconicity is the resemblance or similarity between the form of a signal and its meaning. In two studies, we investigated whether adults interpret iconicity in speech and gesture via a modality-independent mechanism (Study 1, N = 40; Study 2, N = 348). Participants in both studies completed two verb-action matching tasks. In these tasks, either spoken verbs or co-speech gestures were manipulated at different rates to iconically represent actions (i.e., manners of locomotion) performed at corresponding rates. We hypothesized that adult participants would map verbs spoken at a fast rate to fast actions and verbs spoken at a slow rate to slow actions. Similarly, we hypothesized that adult participants would map gestures produced with faster hand movements to fast actions and gestures produced with slower hand movements to slow actions. Moreover, we predicted a positive correlation between the two task performances. In both a pilot study (Study 1) and a preregistered replication (Study 2), participants successfully used iconic cues to match verbs to actions in both verb-action matching tasks. Crucially, adult participants who performed well in the verb-action matching task with iconic speech cues also performed well in the verb-action matching task with iconic gesture cues. This weak positive correlation remained significant even after controlling verbal working memory performance. These findings suggest that adults may rely on a modality-independent cognitive mechanism for interpreting iconicity both within and across different sensory modalities, using both visual information from gestures and auditory information from speech to identify referent actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02698-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Iconicity is the resemblance or similarity between the form of a signal and its meaning. In two studies, we investigated whether adults interpret iconicity in speech and gesture via a modality-independent mechanism (Study 1, N = 40; Study 2, N = 348). Participants in both studies completed two verb-action matching tasks. In these tasks, either spoken verbs or co-speech gestures were manipulated at different rates to iconically represent actions (i.e., manners of locomotion) performed at corresponding rates. We hypothesized that adult participants would map verbs spoken at a fast rate to fast actions and verbs spoken at a slow rate to slow actions. Similarly, we hypothesized that adult participants would map gestures produced with faster hand movements to fast actions and gestures produced with slower hand movements to slow actions. Moreover, we predicted a positive correlation between the two task performances. In both a pilot study (Study 1) and a preregistered replication (Study 2), participants successfully used iconic cues to match verbs to actions in both verb-action matching tasks. Crucially, adult participants who performed well in the verb-action matching task with iconic speech cues also performed well in the verb-action matching task with iconic gesture cues. This weak positive correlation remained significant even after controlling verbal working memory performance. These findings suggest that adults may rely on a modality-independent cognitive mechanism for interpreting iconicity both within and across different sensory modalities, using both visual information from gestures and auditory information from speech to identify referent actions.

成人对言语和手势象似性的理解过程与模态无关。
象似性是指信号的形式与其意义之间的相似或相似。在两项研究中,我们调查了成人是否通过模态无关的机制来解释言语和手势的象似性(研究1,N = 40;研究2,N = 348)。两项研究的参与者都完成了两个动词-动作匹配任务。在这些任务中,口头动词或共同语言手势以不同的速度被操纵,以象征性地表示以相应速度执行的动作(即运动方式)。我们假设成年参与者会将快语速说出的动词与快动作联系起来,将慢语速说出的动词与慢动作联系起来。同样,我们假设成年参与者会将快速手部运动产生的手势映射到快速动作,将慢速手部运动产生的手势映射到慢速动作。此外,我们预测了两个任务绩效之间的正相关关系。在一个初步研究(研究1)和一个预注册的重复研究(研究2)中,参与者在两个动词-动作匹配任务中都成功地使用了标志性的线索来匹配动词和动作。重要的是,在带有标志性言语线索的动动作匹配任务中表现良好的成年参与者在带有标志性手势线索的动动作匹配任务中也表现良好。即使在控制了语言工作记忆的表现后,这种微弱的正相关仍然显著。这些发现表明,成年人可能依赖于一种模态独立的认知机制来解释不同感觉模态内部和之间的象似性,使用来自手势的视觉信息和来自言语的听觉信息来识别指涉行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: The journal provides coverage spanning a broad spectrum of topics in all areas of experimental psychology. The journal is primarily dedicated to the publication of theory and review articles and brief reports of outstanding experimental work. Areas of coverage include cognitive psychology broadly construed, including but not limited to action, perception, & attention, language, learning & memory, reasoning & decision making, and social cognition. We welcome submissions that approach these issues from a variety of perspectives such as behavioral measurements, comparative psychology, development, evolutionary psychology, genetics, neuroscience, and quantitative/computational modeling. We particularly encourage integrative research that crosses traditional content and methodological boundaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信