Fetomaternal Doppler sonography for the prediction of perinatal outcome in term pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: does it have potential?

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ultrasound International Open Pub Date : 2025-04-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2554-0806
Oliver Graupner, Caroline Rath, Linda Lecker, Jochen Ritgen, Bernhard Haller, Christian Enzensberger
{"title":"Fetomaternal Doppler sonography for the prediction of perinatal outcome in term pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: does it have potential?","authors":"Oliver Graupner, Caroline Rath, Linda Lecker, Jochen Ritgen, Bernhard Haller, Christian Enzensberger","doi":"10.1055/a-2554-0806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Little is known about the benefit and interpretation of fetomaternal Doppler sonography in GDM for the prediction of an adverse perinatal outcome (APO). The aim of this study was to examine the performance of fetomaternal Doppler for APO prediction in pregnancies with GDM at term.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton, non-anomalous fetuses of women with GDM, who primarily had a vaginal delivery attempt. Study inclusion also required no other major fetomaternal abnormalities that make placental dysfunction likely. Data on fetomaternal Doppler sonography including umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI), middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI, cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), mean uterine artery PI, cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR) was collected from 37+0 weeks on. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using maternal characteristics, neonatal characteristics, and Doppler ultrasound parameters as independent variables with CAPO as a binary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of n=88 cases were included. Nulliparity (p=0.032) and CPUR (p=0.052) were independent predictors of CAPO. However, CPUR had borderline significance. All other Doppler indices were not independent predictors of CAPO. The ability of CPUR alone (AUC=0.65, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.80) to discriminate between GDM pregnancies with and without CAPO was poor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that there is no significant clinical relationship between fetomaternal Doppler indices and CAPO among pregnancies with GDM. This raises the question regarding the extent to which fetomaternal Doppler indices, which reflect placental function, can be helpful for CAPO prediction in GDM pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":44852,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound International Open","volume":"11 ","pages":"a25540806"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2554-0806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Little is known about the benefit and interpretation of fetomaternal Doppler sonography in GDM for the prediction of an adverse perinatal outcome (APO). The aim of this study was to examine the performance of fetomaternal Doppler for APO prediction in pregnancies with GDM at term.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton, non-anomalous fetuses of women with GDM, who primarily had a vaginal delivery attempt. Study inclusion also required no other major fetomaternal abnormalities that make placental dysfunction likely. Data on fetomaternal Doppler sonography including umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI), middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI, cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), mean uterine artery PI, cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR) was collected from 37+0 weeks on. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using maternal characteristics, neonatal characteristics, and Doppler ultrasound parameters as independent variables with CAPO as a binary outcome.

Results: A total of n=88 cases were included. Nulliparity (p=0.032) and CPUR (p=0.052) were independent predictors of CAPO. However, CPUR had borderline significance. All other Doppler indices were not independent predictors of CAPO. The ability of CPUR alone (AUC=0.65, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.80) to discriminate between GDM pregnancies with and without CAPO was poor.

Conclusion: This study shows that there is no significant clinical relationship between fetomaternal Doppler indices and CAPO among pregnancies with GDM. This raises the question regarding the extent to which fetomaternal Doppler indices, which reflect placental function, can be helpful for CAPO prediction in GDM pregnancies.

胎母多普勒超声预测足月妊娠合并妊娠期糖尿病的围产儿结局:它有潜力吗?
目的:对于GDM胎儿多普勒超声对不良围产期结局(APO)预测的益处和解释知之甚少。本研究的目的是研究胎母多普勒对妊娠期GDM患者APO预测的作用。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,主要是阴道分娩的GDM女性的单胎,非异常胎儿。纳入研究也不需要其他可能导致胎盘功能障碍的主要母婴异常。从第37+0周开始采集胎母多普勒超声资料,包括脐动脉脉搏指数(PI)、大脑中动脉(MCA) PI、脑胎盘比(CPR)、平均子宫动脉PI、脑胎盘子宫比(CPUR)。以产妇特征、新生儿特征和多普勒超声参数为自变量,以CAPO为二元结果,进行多因素logistic回归分析。结果:共纳入n=88例。Nulliparity (p=0.032)和CPUR (p=0.052)是CAPO的独立预测因子。然而,CPUR具有临界意义。其他多普勒指标均不是CAPO的独立预测指标。单独的CPUR (AUC=0.65, 95% CI 0.51 ~ 0.80)区分有和没有CAPO的GDM妊娠的能力很差。结论:本研究提示GDM妊娠胎母多普勒指数与CAPO无明显临床关系。这就提出了一个问题,即反映胎盘功能的母婴多普勒指数在多大程度上有助于预测GDM妊娠的CAPO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound International Open
Ultrasound International Open RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信