Co-designed technologies and people living with dementia: A qualitative systematic review.

Wendy Moyle, Deepa Sriram, Jenny Murfield, Lihui Pu, Katarzyna Lion
{"title":"Co-designed technologies and people living with dementia: A qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Wendy Moyle, Deepa Sriram, Jenny Murfield, Lihui Pu, Katarzyna Lion","doi":"10.1080/10376178.2025.2500377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-designing technologies for people living with dementia can develop a product that benefits their needs and preferences.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To systematically evaluate the use of co-designed technologies for dementia, assess the extent of involvement of people living with dementia in the studies, and analyse the impact of co-design on the final technology and its usage.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This qualitative systematic review followed the Joanna Briggs methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Medline) were searched for qualitative papers published before November 2023. Inclusion criteria were established according to the PICO principle. Four independent reviewers used Covidence to independently screen abstracts and then full text of selected articles. Quality assessments were performed using the JBI quality assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included nine primary studies involving 354 participants from three countries and identified three interconnected themes. Various technologies were developed, with apps being the most popular tool. The technologies were not well developed, with the majority (n = 7) developed in the early stages of development. Participants' main involvement was in the consultation stage, where they were asked about an assessment of their needs to determine a product, followed by their involvement in the useability and acceptability of the products.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While co-design is employed in developing certain technologies for people living with dementia, its effectiveness is hindered by the lack of involvement of people living with dementia in the actual conceptualization and design stages. Researchers, nursing professionals, and developers must embrace co-design as standard practice and employ consistent terminology in this process.</p>","PeriodicalId":93954,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary nurse","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary nurse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2025.2500377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Co-designing technologies for people living with dementia can develop a product that benefits their needs and preferences.

Aims: To systematically evaluate the use of co-designed technologies for dementia, assess the extent of involvement of people living with dementia in the studies, and analyse the impact of co-design on the final technology and its usage.

Design: This qualitative systematic review followed the Joanna Briggs methodology.

Methods: Five electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Medline) were searched for qualitative papers published before November 2023. Inclusion criteria were established according to the PICO principle. Four independent reviewers used Covidence to independently screen abstracts and then full text of selected articles. Quality assessments were performed using the JBI quality assessment tool.

Results: The review included nine primary studies involving 354 participants from three countries and identified three interconnected themes. Various technologies were developed, with apps being the most popular tool. The technologies were not well developed, with the majority (n = 7) developed in the early stages of development. Participants' main involvement was in the consultation stage, where they were asked about an assessment of their needs to determine a product, followed by their involvement in the useability and acceptability of the products.

Conclusions: While co-design is employed in developing certain technologies for people living with dementia, its effectiveness is hindered by the lack of involvement of people living with dementia in the actual conceptualization and design stages. Researchers, nursing professionals, and developers must embrace co-design as standard practice and employ consistent terminology in this process.

共同设计的技术与痴呆症患者:一项定性的系统回顾。
背景:针对痴呆症患者的协同设计技术可以开发出符合其需求和偏好的产品。目的:系统地评估联合设计技术在痴呆治疗中的应用,评估痴呆患者参与研究的程度,并分析联合设计对最终技术及其使用的影响。设计:本研究采用乔安娜·布里格斯的定性系统评价方法。方法:检索2023年11月前发表的5个电子数据库(CINAHL、EMBASE、PubMed、PsycINFO、Medline)。根据PICO原则建立纳入标准。四名独立审稿人使用covid - ence对选定文章的摘要和全文进行独立筛选。使用JBI质量评估工具进行质量评估。结果:该综述包括9项主要研究,涉及来自3个国家的354名参与者,并确定了3个相互关联的主题。各种技术被开发出来,其中应用程序是最受欢迎的工具。这些技术没有得到很好的发展,大多数(n = 7)是在发展的早期阶段开发的。参与者的主要参与是在咨询阶段,在此阶段,他们被要求评估他们的需求以确定产品,然后他们参与产品的可用性和可接受性。结论:虽然共同设计被用于为痴呆症患者开发某些技术,但由于在实际的概念化和设计阶段缺乏痴呆症患者的参与,其有效性受到阻碍。研究人员、护理专业人员和开发人员必须将协同设计作为标准实践,并在此过程中使用一致的术语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信