Robotic-Assisted Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Single-Center Experience.

Yoshiyuki Yamashita, Gianluca Torregrossa, Serge Sicouri, Mary Ann C Wertan, Danielle D Spragan, Basel Ramlawi, Francis P Sutter
{"title":"Robotic-Assisted Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Yoshiyuki Yamashita, Gianluca Torregrossa, Serge Sicouri, Mary Ann C Wertan, Danielle D Spragan, Basel Ramlawi, Francis P Sutter","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report our experience with robotic-assisted redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included patients undergoing robotic-assisted redo CABG between 2016 and 2023. Patient demographics and operative outcomes were compared with those of initial robotic-assisted CABG procedures performed during the same period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 12 patients undergoing robotic-assisted redo CABG, with a median age of 73 years. Compared to initial CABG patients (n = 1415), the Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores were significantly higher (median: 0.90 vs. 7.05, p <0.001) in the redo group. Six patients had de novo internal mammary artery (IMA) to left anterior descending (LAD) bypass, 4 had redo LAD bypass, and 2 had non-LAD bypass. Among the 10 patients with LAD bypass, 4 also underwent hybrid percutaneous coronary intervention. While operating room time (5.4 vs. 7.4 hours, p <0.001), postoperative lengths of stay (4.0 vs. 5.5 days, p = 0.02) and the need for blood transfusion (15% vs. 42%, p = 0.02) were significantly greater in the redo group compared to the initial group, there were no conversions to sternotomy, unplanned revascularization, or in-hospital mortality in the redo patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic-assisted redo CABG demonstrated promising operative outcomes in appropriately selected patients despite the higher-risk cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":93877,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To report our experience with robotic-assisted redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients undergoing robotic-assisted redo CABG between 2016 and 2023. Patient demographics and operative outcomes were compared with those of initial robotic-assisted CABG procedures performed during the same period.

Results: There were 12 patients undergoing robotic-assisted redo CABG, with a median age of 73 years. Compared to initial CABG patients (n = 1415), the Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores were significantly higher (median: 0.90 vs. 7.05, p <0.001) in the redo group. Six patients had de novo internal mammary artery (IMA) to left anterior descending (LAD) bypass, 4 had redo LAD bypass, and 2 had non-LAD bypass. Among the 10 patients with LAD bypass, 4 also underwent hybrid percutaneous coronary intervention. While operating room time (5.4 vs. 7.4 hours, p <0.001), postoperative lengths of stay (4.0 vs. 5.5 days, p = 0.02) and the need for blood transfusion (15% vs. 42%, p = 0.02) were significantly greater in the redo group compared to the initial group, there were no conversions to sternotomy, unplanned revascularization, or in-hospital mortality in the redo patients.

Conclusion: Robotic-assisted redo CABG demonstrated promising operative outcomes in appropriately selected patients despite the higher-risk cohort.

机器人辅助重做冠状动脉旁路移植术:单中心体验。
目的:报告我们在机器人辅助下重做冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的经验。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2016年至2023年间接受机器人辅助重做CABG的患者。患者人口统计数据和手术结果与同期进行的初始机器人辅助CABG手术进行了比较。结果:12例患者接受机器人辅助重做CABG,中位年龄73岁。与初始CABG患者(n = 1415)相比,胸外科学会评分明显更高(中位数:0.90 vs. 7.05, p)。结论:尽管高危队列存在,但在适当选择的患者中,机器人辅助重做CABG显示出良好的手术结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信