Prostate cancer screening guidelines and their alignment with recent literature.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Michael Gerlach, Anne Schempp
{"title":"Prostate cancer screening guidelines and their alignment with recent literature.","authors":"Michael Gerlach, Anne Schempp","doi":"10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test is a simple blood test that is used to screen for prostate cancer. Over the last 30 years, the benefit of screening with a PSA test has been a matter of significant debate because of its association with overscreening, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment of prostate cancer. Although most prostate cancer screening guidelines recommend a shared decision-making approach between the patient and provider, these recommendations are contradictory in terms of screening initiation, frequency, and discontinuation as well as screening recommendations for high-risk populations. This article describes a literature review comparing screening guidelines with newer research in order to determine which guideline aligns most closely with the latest findings. Results show that the related American Urological Association and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, for example, may lead to over- or underscreening, whereas the American Cancer Society (ACS) guideline seems most closely in alignment with recent research. By following the ACS guideline, most clinically significant prostate cancer should be captured with less risk of overscreening and overdiagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48728,"journal":{"name":"Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants","volume":"38 5","pages":"e12-e15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test is a simple blood test that is used to screen for prostate cancer. Over the last 30 years, the benefit of screening with a PSA test has been a matter of significant debate because of its association with overscreening, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment of prostate cancer. Although most prostate cancer screening guidelines recommend a shared decision-making approach between the patient and provider, these recommendations are contradictory in terms of screening initiation, frequency, and discontinuation as well as screening recommendations for high-risk populations. This article describes a literature review comparing screening guidelines with newer research in order to determine which guideline aligns most closely with the latest findings. Results show that the related American Urological Association and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, for example, may lead to over- or underscreening, whereas the American Cancer Society (ACS) guideline seems most closely in alignment with recent research. By following the ACS guideline, most clinically significant prostate cancer should be captured with less risk of overscreening and overdiagnosis.

前列腺癌筛查指南及其与近期文献的一致性。
摘要:前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)测试是一种简单的血液测试,用于筛查前列腺癌。在过去的30年里,由于PSA检测与前列腺癌的过度筛查、过度诊断和过度治疗有关,因此其筛查的益处一直存在重大争议。尽管大多数前列腺癌筛查指南建议患者和医生共同决策,但这些建议在筛查的开始、频率和停止以及高危人群的筛查建议方面是相互矛盾的。这篇文章描述了一篇文献综述,比较筛选指南与较新的研究,以确定哪个指南与最新发现最接近。结果显示,相关的美国泌尿学协会和国家综合癌症网络指南,例如,可能导致过度或不足的筛查,而美国癌症协会(ACS)的指南似乎与最近的研究最为一致。通过遵循ACS指南,大多数临床意义重大的前列腺癌应被捕获,而过度筛查和过度诊断的风险较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
310
期刊介绍: ​​​JAAPA is the peer-reviewed clinical journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA). Published for more than 25 years, its mission is to support the ongoing education and advancement of physician assistants (PAs) by publishing current information and research on clinical, health policy, and professional issues. Published monthly, JAAPA''s award-winning editorial includes: -Clinical review articles (with AAPA-approved Category I CME in each issue)- Case reports- Clinical departments- Original health services research- Articles on issues of professional interest to PAs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信