The efficacy and safety of microwave ablation in managing osteoid osteoma: a systematic review.

IF 0.4 Q4 SURGERY
Case Reports in Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23320885.2025.2503195
Berun A Abdalla, Hiwa O Abdullah, Hawkar A Nasralla, Rebaz M Ali, Sami S Omar, Abdullah K Ghafour, Saywan K Asaad, Soran S Raoof, Soran H Tahir, Rezheen J Rashid, Ayoob A Mohammed, Nasren Sharef Sabr, Ali H Hasan, Lawen Jamal Mustafa, Ameer M Salih, Fahmi H Kakamad
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of microwave ablation in managing osteoid osteoma: a systematic review.","authors":"Berun A Abdalla, Hiwa O Abdullah, Hawkar A Nasralla, Rebaz M Ali, Sami S Omar, Abdullah K Ghafour, Saywan K Asaad, Soran S Raoof, Soran H Tahir, Rezheen J Rashid, Ayoob A Mohammed, Nasren Sharef Sabr, Ali H Hasan, Lawen Jamal Mustafa, Ameer M Salih, Fahmi H Kakamad","doi":"10.1080/23320885.2025.2503195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Microwave ablation (MWA) utilizes electromagnetic methods to destroy tumors, employing devices operating at 900 MHz or above frequencies. MWA has emerged as a recent alternative for treating osteoid osteoma (OO), providing similar accessibility, safety, and technical effectiveness as radiofrequency ablation. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MWA in treating OO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of published studies on the use of MWA in managing OO was conducted. Studies were excluded if they were 1) not written in English, 2) case reports, 3) lacked adequate peer review, or 4) consisted solely of abstracts. Before full-text assessment, titles, and abstracts were screened. Extracted data included author, year, study design, patient count, age, gender, OO site, ablation power (watts), duration, complications, outcome, and recurrence. The data were analyzed and presented as means, frequencies, and percentages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies, including 143 cases, met the inclusion criteria; among these cases, 59.44% were male, and the mean age was 19.03 ± 7.09. Most of the OOs were in the femur, 54.54%. MWA at 60 W was the prevailing power setting, utilized in 37 cases (25.87%), with an ablation time of 90 s for 95 cases (66.43%). Clinical success was achieved in 137 (95.80%) cases, with recurrence observed in 4 cases (2.80%). However, 16 minor and major complications were observed despite the overall success.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percutaneous MWA may represent an efficient choice for the minimally invasive management of OO, demonstrating a minimal risk of complications and recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":42421,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":"2503195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23320885.2025.2503195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Microwave ablation (MWA) utilizes electromagnetic methods to destroy tumors, employing devices operating at 900 MHz or above frequencies. MWA has emerged as a recent alternative for treating osteoid osteoma (OO), providing similar accessibility, safety, and technical effectiveness as radiofrequency ablation. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MWA in treating OO.

Methods: A systematic review of published studies on the use of MWA in managing OO was conducted. Studies were excluded if they were 1) not written in English, 2) case reports, 3) lacked adequate peer review, or 4) consisted solely of abstracts. Before full-text assessment, titles, and abstracts were screened. Extracted data included author, year, study design, patient count, age, gender, OO site, ablation power (watts), duration, complications, outcome, and recurrence. The data were analyzed and presented as means, frequencies, and percentages.

Results: Eight studies, including 143 cases, met the inclusion criteria; among these cases, 59.44% were male, and the mean age was 19.03 ± 7.09. Most of the OOs were in the femur, 54.54%. MWA at 60 W was the prevailing power setting, utilized in 37 cases (25.87%), with an ablation time of 90 s for 95 cases (66.43%). Clinical success was achieved in 137 (95.80%) cases, with recurrence observed in 4 cases (2.80%). However, 16 minor and major complications were observed despite the overall success.

Conclusion: Percutaneous MWA may represent an efficient choice for the minimally invasive management of OO, demonstrating a minimal risk of complications and recurrence.

微波消融治疗骨样骨瘤的有效性和安全性:一项系统综述。
微波消融术(MWA)利用电磁方法摧毁肿瘤,使用900兆赫或以上频率的设备。MWA最近成为治疗类骨瘤(OO)的一种替代方法,具有与射频消融术相似的可及性、安全性和技术有效性。本系统综述旨在评价MWA治疗OO的安全性和有效性。方法:系统回顾已发表的关于使用MWA管理OO的研究。排除以下研究:1)非英文写作,2)病例报告,3)缺乏充分的同行评议,或4)仅由摘要组成。在全文评估之前,对标题和摘要进行筛选。提取的数据包括作者、年份、研究设计、患者数量、年龄、性别、OO部位、消融功率(瓦)、持续时间、并发症、结局和复发。对数据进行分析,并以平均值、频率和百分比表示。结果:8项研究143例符合纳入标准;其中男性占59.44%,平均年龄19.03±7.09岁。绝大多数OOs发生在股骨,占54.54%。60w的MWA是主要的功率设置,37例(25.87%)使用,95例(66.43%)消融时间为90 s。临床成功137例(95.80%),复发4例(2.80%)。然而,尽管总体成功,但仍观察到16个大大小小的并发症。结论:经皮MWA可能是微创治疗OO的有效选择,其并发症和复发风险极小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信