Claudia Espinoza-Bravo, Montserrat Rejano-Campo, Fernando Domínguez-Navarro, Bernadette de Gasquet, Laura Fuentes-Aparicio
{"title":"Intraobserver Reliability of Two-Dimensional Ultrasound Measurements of the Linea Alba in Parous Women During Different Abdominopelvic Exercises.","authors":"Claudia Espinoza-Bravo, Montserrat Rejano-Campo, Fernando Domínguez-Navarro, Bernadette de Gasquet, Laura Fuentes-Aparicio","doi":"10.1002/jum.16697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the intraobserver reliability of Diastasis Recti Abdominis (DRA) measurement by ultrasonography during four specific abdominopelvic exercises, evaluating interrecti distance, Linea Alba (LA) thickness, and distortion index in parous women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-four parous women were assessed using ultrasound imaging for the LA. Four exercises were evaluated: crunch, abdominal drawing-in maneuver, pelvic floor muscle contraction, and one exercise based on the de Gasquet Method. Each exercise was performed three times. The ultrasound probe was placed 3 cm above and 2 cm below the umbilicus. Interrecti distance (IRD), distortion index, and LA thickness were measured and analyzed using ImageJ software by independent researchers. Intraobserver reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICC values for the IRD ranged from 0.84 to 0.99 for the four exercises. The distortion index showed moderate to high reliability (ICC: 0.77-0.98), while LA thickness also demonstrated moderate to high reliability (ICC: 0.75-0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrate the reliability of ultrasound in measuring key parameters, including LA thickness, distortion, and IRD in women with DRA during various exercises. As a non-invasive tool, it supports evidence-based interventions in postpartum recovery and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the intraobserver reliability of Diastasis Recti Abdominis (DRA) measurement by ultrasonography during four specific abdominopelvic exercises, evaluating interrecti distance, Linea Alba (LA) thickness, and distortion index in parous women.
Methods: Fifty-four parous women were assessed using ultrasound imaging for the LA. Four exercises were evaluated: crunch, abdominal drawing-in maneuver, pelvic floor muscle contraction, and one exercise based on the de Gasquet Method. Each exercise was performed three times. The ultrasound probe was placed 3 cm above and 2 cm below the umbilicus. Interrecti distance (IRD), distortion index, and LA thickness were measured and analyzed using ImageJ software by independent researchers. Intraobserver reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval.
Results: ICC values for the IRD ranged from 0.84 to 0.99 for the four exercises. The distortion index showed moderate to high reliability (ICC: 0.77-0.98), while LA thickness also demonstrated moderate to high reliability (ICC: 0.75-0.98).
Conclusion: The results demonstrate the reliability of ultrasound in measuring key parameters, including LA thickness, distortion, and IRD in women with DRA during various exercises. As a non-invasive tool, it supports evidence-based interventions in postpartum recovery and clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community.
Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to:
-Basic Science-
Breast Ultrasound-
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-
Dermatology-
Echocardiography-
Elastography-
Emergency Medicine-
Fetal Echocardiography-
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound-
General and Abdominal Ultrasound-
Genitourinary Ultrasound-
Gynecologic Ultrasound-
Head and Neck Ultrasound-
High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging-
Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound-
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-
Neurosonology-
Obstetric Ultrasound-
Ophthalmologic Ultrasound-
Pediatric Ultrasound-
Point-of-Care Ultrasound-
Public Policy-
Superficial Structures-
Therapeutic Ultrasound-
Ultrasound Education-
Ultrasound in Global Health-
Urologic Ultrasound-
Vascular Ultrasound