Counting the Carbon: Quantifying Financial and Environmental Implications of Wasted Inhaler Doses in the Hospital Setting.

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-04-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4212/cjhp.3606
Alison Bentley, Celia L Culley, Valeria Stoynova
{"title":"Counting the Carbon: Quantifying Financial and Environmental Implications of Wasted Inhaler Doses in the Hospital Setting.","authors":"Alison Bentley, Celia L Culley, Valeria Stoynova","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inhalers contribute to health care-related environmental impacts, particularly through greenhouse gas emissions. They are dispensed in multidose formats, which leads to waste, yet little is known about the environmental impact of inhaler waste in the hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to quantify wasted inhaler actuations on adult medicine and respiratory wards at a community and a tertiary hospital. Secondary objectives were to quantify the cost and carbon footprint of wasted doses, to determine the rate of duplicate inhaler dispensing, and to quantify the prevalence of dispensed inhalers remaining unused.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this multicentre, retrospective chart review, the pharmacy informatics team generated a report of adult inpatients for whom one or more inhalers were dispensed from the pharmacy to the respiratory and general medicine wards at a 500-bed tertiary hospital or to the medicine-surgery ward at a 48-bed community hospital over 3 nonconsecutive months (during fiscal year 2021/22). The number of inhalers dispensed was compared with the number of doses documented on patients' medication administration records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 23 031 actuations (211 inhalers) were dispensed for 132 patients. Of these, 81.9% were wasted, at a total cost of $6172.82 over the 3 months of the study. For 22 patients (16.7%), at least one inhaler was dispensed, yet no doses were administered; for 16 (12.1%), a duplicate inhaler was dispensed. The carbon footprint of the wasted doses was 1 226 342 g carbon dioxide equivalent, equivalent to driving 5951 km by car.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed significant inhaler waste in the hospital setting, which contributes to the health care-related carbon footprint without contributing to patient care. These results raise important questions about how to continue providing high-quality patient care while minimizing carbon footprint and health care costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"78 2","pages":"e3606"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inhalers contribute to health care-related environmental impacts, particularly through greenhouse gas emissions. They are dispensed in multidose formats, which leads to waste, yet little is known about the environmental impact of inhaler waste in the hospital setting.

Objectives: The primary objective was to quantify wasted inhaler actuations on adult medicine and respiratory wards at a community and a tertiary hospital. Secondary objectives were to quantify the cost and carbon footprint of wasted doses, to determine the rate of duplicate inhaler dispensing, and to quantify the prevalence of dispensed inhalers remaining unused.

Methods: For this multicentre, retrospective chart review, the pharmacy informatics team generated a report of adult inpatients for whom one or more inhalers were dispensed from the pharmacy to the respiratory and general medicine wards at a 500-bed tertiary hospital or to the medicine-surgery ward at a 48-bed community hospital over 3 nonconsecutive months (during fiscal year 2021/22). The number of inhalers dispensed was compared with the number of doses documented on patients' medication administration records.

Results: In this study, 23 031 actuations (211 inhalers) were dispensed for 132 patients. Of these, 81.9% were wasted, at a total cost of $6172.82 over the 3 months of the study. For 22 patients (16.7%), at least one inhaler was dispensed, yet no doses were administered; for 16 (12.1%), a duplicate inhaler was dispensed. The carbon footprint of the wasted doses was 1 226 342 g carbon dioxide equivalent, equivalent to driving 5951 km by car.

Conclusions: This study showed significant inhaler waste in the hospital setting, which contributes to the health care-related carbon footprint without contributing to patient care. These results raise important questions about how to continue providing high-quality patient care while minimizing carbon footprint and health care costs.

计算碳:量化在医院环境中浪费吸入器剂量的财务和环境影响。
背景:吸入器造成与卫生保健有关的环境影响,特别是通过温室气体排放。它们以多剂量形式分配,导致浪费,但对医院环境中吸入器废物的环境影响知之甚少。目的:主要目的是量化在社区和三级医院的成人医学和呼吸病房浪费的吸入器驱动。次要目标是量化浪费剂量的成本和碳足迹,确定重复分配吸入器的比率,并量化已分配吸入器未使用的发生率。方法:在这项多中心回顾性图表回顾中,药学信息学团队生成了一份报告,该报告显示,在非连续的3个月内(2021/22财政年度),一家拥有500张床位的三级医院的呼吸内科和普通内科病房或一家拥有48张床位的社区医院的内科-外科病房,从药房配发了一个或多个吸入器。将分配的吸入器数量与患者药物管理记录上记录的剂量数量进行比较。结果:本研究共为132例患者配发了23 031个驱动器(211个吸入器)。其中,81.9%被浪费了,在3个月的研究中,总成本为6172.82美元。22例患者(16.7%)至少配发了一个吸入器,但没有给药;16例(12.1%)使用了重复吸入器。浪费剂量的碳足迹为1 226 342克二氧化碳当量,相当于汽车行驶5951公里。结论:本研究表明,医院环境中存在大量的吸入器浪费,这有助于医疗保健相关的碳足迹,而不会对患者护理做出贡献。这些结果提出了一个重要的问题,即如何继续提供高质量的患者护理,同时最大限度地减少碳足迹和医疗保健成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信