Study of the effectiveness of combined rabies-tetanus vaccine as compared to individual vaccines.

IF 2.1 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI:10.7774/cevr.2025.14.e15
Sarah Ghazy, Mohammed E Rashed, Amal E Ali, Hamdallah H Zedan
{"title":"Study of the effectiveness of combined rabies-tetanus vaccine as compared to individual vaccines.","authors":"Sarah Ghazy, Mohammed E Rashed, Amal E Ali, Hamdallah H Zedan","doi":"10.7774/cevr.2025.14.e15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Effective treatment for animal bites is essential, encompassing immediate measures and protocols for rabies and tetanus vaccination. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of the administration of individual and combined rabies-tetanus (RT) vaccines in mice as model animals.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Animal groups were injected with either undiluted Toxovac<sup>®</sup> combined with Rabies vaccine<sup>®</sup> (RT/Group 1)/Speeda<sup>®</sup> (ST/Group 3), 2-fold diluted Toxovac<sup>®</sup> with Rabies vaccine<sup>®</sup> (RT1/2/Group 2), or purified tetanus toxoid with Speeda<sup>®</sup> (Spurf/Group 4). Mice were immunized with either 2 intraperitoneal (IP) doses at one-week interval or one subcutaneous (SC) dose for rabies immunogenicity, and with one SC dose for tetanus immunogenicity. The potency of the vaccines was determined through challenge test, while their immunogenicity was examined by measuring the anti-rabies and anti-tetanus immunoglobulin G response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All tested vaccines were potent except Spurf; tetanus was not potent. Rabies' immunogenicity for all combinations through both routes of administration showed comparable antibody response & non-significant difference (p≥0.05) at days 14 and 28 compared to single rabies injected by 2 IP doses. Tetanus' immunogenicity in combinations was compared with Toxovac<sup>®</sup>. RT depicted higher antibody response on both days 14 and 28. Whereas RT1/2 showed a non-significant difference on both days 14 and 28. Therefore, rabies has a synergistic effect on tetanus in combination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The immune response to rabies in combination vaccine injected as a single SC dose was as effective as 2 IP doses of single vaccine. Our results highlight the potential of RT combination vaccine via SC as a cost-effective means to provide protective immunity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51768,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research","volume":"14 2","pages":"138-148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7774/cevr.2025.14.e15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Effective treatment for animal bites is essential, encompassing immediate measures and protocols for rabies and tetanus vaccination. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of the administration of individual and combined rabies-tetanus (RT) vaccines in mice as model animals.

Materials and methods: Animal groups were injected with either undiluted Toxovac® combined with Rabies vaccine® (RT/Group 1)/Speeda® (ST/Group 3), 2-fold diluted Toxovac® with Rabies vaccine® (RT1/2/Group 2), or purified tetanus toxoid with Speeda® (Spurf/Group 4). Mice were immunized with either 2 intraperitoneal (IP) doses at one-week interval or one subcutaneous (SC) dose for rabies immunogenicity, and with one SC dose for tetanus immunogenicity. The potency of the vaccines was determined through challenge test, while their immunogenicity was examined by measuring the anti-rabies and anti-tetanus immunoglobulin G response.

Results: All tested vaccines were potent except Spurf; tetanus was not potent. Rabies' immunogenicity for all combinations through both routes of administration showed comparable antibody response & non-significant difference (p≥0.05) at days 14 and 28 compared to single rabies injected by 2 IP doses. Tetanus' immunogenicity in combinations was compared with Toxovac®. RT depicted higher antibody response on both days 14 and 28. Whereas RT1/2 showed a non-significant difference on both days 14 and 28. Therefore, rabies has a synergistic effect on tetanus in combination.

Conclusion: The immune response to rabies in combination vaccine injected as a single SC dose was as effective as 2 IP doses of single vaccine. Our results highlight the potential of RT combination vaccine via SC as a cost-effective means to provide protective immunity.

与单独疫苗相比,狂犬病-破伤风联合疫苗的有效性研究。
目的:对动物咬伤进行有效治疗至关重要,包括立即采取狂犬病和破伤风疫苗接种措施和规程。在这项研究中,我们评估了单独和联合狂犬病-破伤风(RT)疫苗在小鼠模型动物中的有效性。材料和方法:动物组分别注射未稀释的Toxovac®联合狂犬疫苗®(RT/ 1组)/Speeda®(ST/ 3组)、2倍稀释的Toxovac®联合狂犬疫苗®(RT1/2/ 2组)或纯化的Speeda®破伤风类毒素(Spurf/ 4组)。小鼠分别以2次腹腔注射(IP)和1次皮下注射(SC)免疫狂犬病免疫原性和1次皮下注射(SC)免疫破伤风免疫原性。通过攻毒试验确定疫苗的效力,通过测定抗狂犬病和抗破伤风免疫球蛋白G反应检测疫苗的免疫原性。结果:除Spurf外,所有疫苗均有效;破伤风没有效力。两种给药方式的所有组合在第14天和第28天的抗体应答与单剂注射狂犬病相比无显著性差异(p≥0.05)。比较了破伤风与Toxovac®联合使用的免疫原性。RT在第14天和第28天均显示较高的抗体应答。而RT1/2在第14天和第28天均无显著差异。因此,狂犬病对破伤风具有协同作用。结论:单次注射SC疫苗对狂犬病的免疫应答与单次注射IP疫苗的免疫应答相同。我们的结果强调了通过SC的RT联合疫苗作为一种具有成本效益的提供保护性免疫的方法的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clin Exp Vaccine Res, the official English journal of the Korean Vaccine Society, is an international, peer reviewed, and open-access journal. It covers all areas related to vaccines and vaccination. Clin Exp Vaccine Res publishes editorials, review articles, special articles, original articles, case reports, brief communications, and correspondences covering a wide range of clinical and experimental subjects including vaccines and vaccination for human and animals against infectious diseases caused by viruses, bacteria, parasites and tumor. The scope of the journal is to disseminate information that may contribute to elaborate vaccine development and vaccination strategies targeting infectious diseases and tumors in human and animals. Relevant topics range from experimental approaches to (pre)clinical trials for the vaccine research based on, but not limited to, basic laboratory, translational, and (pre)clinical investigations, epidemiology of infectious diseases and progression of all aspects in the health related issues. It is published printed and open accessed online issues (https://ecevr.org) two times per year in 31 January and 31 July. Clin Exp Vaccine Res is linked to many international databases and is made freely available to institutions and individuals worldwide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信