Impact of an improvement in the early left ventricular ejection fraction on the 1-year clinical outcomes and its predictors after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
{"title":"Impact of an improvement in the early left ventricular ejection fraction on the 1-year clinical outcomes and its predictors after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.","authors":"Ikuko Shibasaki, Yusuke Takei, Suguru Hirose, Michiaki Tokura, Masahiro Tezuka, Shohei Yokoyama, Ryujiro Suzuki, Riichi Nishikawa, Shu Inami, Yasuo Haruyama, Shigeru Toyoda, Hirotsugu Fukuda","doi":"10.1007/s00595-025-03036-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We evaluated the 1-year clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, heart failure rehospitalization, and their composite) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and a preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and examined the baseline factors predicting ≥ 10% early LVEF improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients who underwent TAVR and divided them into Group R (≥ 10% LVEF improvement, n = 25) or Group N (< 10% improvement, n = 19). A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the survival rates, and multivariable logistic regression was applied to identify the predictors of LVEF improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 84.8 ± 4.8 years, and 40.9% were male. Post-TAVR, 56.8% of patients showed ≥ 10% LVEF improvement (mean increase: 16.7 ± 6.1%). The one-year mortality was similar between the groups (p = 0.383), whereas the composite endpoint tended to be higher in Group N (0.4% vs. 21.1%, p = 0.072). The peak aortic valve velocity was the only significant predictor (OR = 0.255, p = 0.048; cutoff: 4.45 m/s, sensitivity, 0.840; specificity, 0.684).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with severe AS and a preoperative LVEF of < 50%, 56.8% demonstrated a significant early LVEF improvement post-TAVR. Patients with a ≥ 10% improvement had a significantly lower 1-year mortality rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03036-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: We evaluated the 1-year clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, heart failure rehospitalization, and their composite) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and a preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and examined the baseline factors predicting ≥ 10% early LVEF improvement.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients who underwent TAVR and divided them into Group R (≥ 10% LVEF improvement, n = 25) or Group N (< 10% improvement, n = 19). A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the survival rates, and multivariable logistic regression was applied to identify the predictors of LVEF improvement.
Results: The mean patient age was 84.8 ± 4.8 years, and 40.9% were male. Post-TAVR, 56.8% of patients showed ≥ 10% LVEF improvement (mean increase: 16.7 ± 6.1%). The one-year mortality was similar between the groups (p = 0.383), whereas the composite endpoint tended to be higher in Group N (0.4% vs. 21.1%, p = 0.072). The peak aortic valve velocity was the only significant predictor (OR = 0.255, p = 0.048; cutoff: 4.45 m/s, sensitivity, 0.840; specificity, 0.684).
Conclusion: In patients with severe AS and a preoperative LVEF of < 50%, 56.8% demonstrated a significant early LVEF improvement post-TAVR. Patients with a ≥ 10% improvement had a significantly lower 1-year mortality rate.
期刊介绍:
Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it").
The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.