Using markerless motion analysis to quantify sex and discipline differences in external mechanical work during badminton match play.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Sports Sciences Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1080/02640414.2025.2489863
Filippo Santiano, Seb Ison, Julie Emmerson, Steffi Colyer
{"title":"Using markerless motion analysis to quantify sex and discipline differences in external mechanical work during badminton match play.","authors":"Filippo Santiano, Seb Ison, Julie Emmerson, Steffi Colyer","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2489863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The high prevalence of overuse injuries in badminton poses a major threat to player development and success, with current training 'load' metrics insufficient for capturing the physical demands. This study quantified the external mechanical work performed during badminton match play across different sexes and disciplines. An eight-camera system captured fourteen male and fourteen female competitive (University to national level) badminton players competing across a total of nine singles and six doubles matches. Markerless pose estimation (HRNet) was used to drive a kinematic model (OpenSim) of each player and compute mass-normalised external mechanical work and power for 30 points per match. A linear mixed effects model found normalised work and power to be greater in men's vs. women's matches (effect size [ES] ± 90% CI = 0.60 ± 0.29 and 1.10 ± 0.48, respectively). Normalised work and power were also greater in singles vs. doubles matches (ES = 0.44 ± 0.29 and 0.47 ± 0.44, respectively). Interestingly, discipline differences were greatest among the most skilled players (e.g. ES = 0.88 ± 0.49 for first-team males). These findings highlight the importance of additional strength training and adequate recovery for elite male players to manage the high physical demands of singles match play.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":"43 12","pages":"1158-1166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2489863","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The high prevalence of overuse injuries in badminton poses a major threat to player development and success, with current training 'load' metrics insufficient for capturing the physical demands. This study quantified the external mechanical work performed during badminton match play across different sexes and disciplines. An eight-camera system captured fourteen male and fourteen female competitive (University to national level) badminton players competing across a total of nine singles and six doubles matches. Markerless pose estimation (HRNet) was used to drive a kinematic model (OpenSim) of each player and compute mass-normalised external mechanical work and power for 30 points per match. A linear mixed effects model found normalised work and power to be greater in men's vs. women's matches (effect size [ES] ± 90% CI = 0.60 ± 0.29 and 1.10 ± 0.48, respectively). Normalised work and power were also greater in singles vs. doubles matches (ES = 0.44 ± 0.29 and 0.47 ± 0.44, respectively). Interestingly, discipline differences were greatest among the most skilled players (e.g. ES = 0.88 ± 0.49 for first-team males). These findings highlight the importance of additional strength training and adequate recovery for elite male players to manage the high physical demands of singles match play.

利用无标记运动分析量化羽毛球比赛中外机械功的性别和学科差异。
羽毛球运动中过度使用损伤的高发对运动员的发展和成功构成了重大威胁,目前的训练“负荷”指标不足以满足运动员的身体需求。本研究量化了不同性别和学科的羽毛球比赛中进行的外部机械功。一个8摄像头系统拍摄了14名男子和14名女子羽毛球运动员(从大学到国家水平)在9场单打和6场双打比赛中的比赛。使用无标记姿态估计(HRNet)驱动每个球员的运动学模型(OpenSim),并计算每场比赛30分的质量归一化外部机械功和功率。线性混合效应模型发现,男性比赛的归一化工作和功率大于女性比赛(效应值[ES]±90% CI分别= 0.60±0.29和1.10±0.48)。单打比赛的标准化工作和力量也比双打比赛大(ES分别= 0.44±0.29和0.47±0.44)。有趣的是,最熟练的球员之间的学科差异最大(例如,一线队男性球员的ES = 0.88±0.49)。这些发现强调了额外的力量训练和足够的恢复对于优秀男性运动员管理单打比赛的高身体要求的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信