{"title":"Prevalence of behavioural signs commonly associated with feline hyperaesthesia syndrome among healthy cats.","authors":"M Avril, A Lamoureux, S Valentin, A Jeandel","doi":"10.1111/jsap.13878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The most common clinical signs of feline hyperaesthesia syndrome are rolling skin and behavioural abnormalities (e.g. licking or biting the tail, flanks, anal region or lumbar region). This study aimed to determine the prevalence of behavioural signs commonly associated with feline hyperaesthesia syndrome among healthy cats.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional bicentric prospective study included 208 healthy cats that presented for vaccination. A survey about the cats' behaviour was completed by caregivers and six general practice veterinarians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three per cent of the cats presented at least one behavioural sign of feline hyperaesthesia syndrome. Only 26.9% of the caregivers report zero behavioural of feline hyperaesthesia syndrome at home. Eighty per cent of the indoor-only cats and 65.3% of the outdoor cats had at least one behavioural sign (odds ratio 2.08, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 3.88). Thirty-one per cent of the cats reacted to lumbar palpation by veterinarians, and 18.7% of these cats were not reported to present signs of feline hyperaesthesia syndrome at home.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>In this population of healthy cats, 73.1% of cats consistently displayed at least one behavioural sign of feline hyperaesthesia syndrome at home. Adverse reactions after lumbar palpation by a veterinarian were also reported in healthy cats, including cats without behavioural signs at home. The results suggest that many of these behavioural signs have no diagnostic value in isolation. A scoring system could be used to differentiate cats with feline hyperaesthesia syndrome from cats with normal behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.13878","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The most common clinical signs of feline hyperaesthesia syndrome are rolling skin and behavioural abnormalities (e.g. licking or biting the tail, flanks, anal region or lumbar region). This study aimed to determine the prevalence of behavioural signs commonly associated with feline hyperaesthesia syndrome among healthy cats.
Materials and methods: This descriptive cross-sectional bicentric prospective study included 208 healthy cats that presented for vaccination. A survey about the cats' behaviour was completed by caregivers and six general practice veterinarians.
Results: Seventy-three per cent of the cats presented at least one behavioural sign of feline hyperaesthesia syndrome. Only 26.9% of the caregivers report zero behavioural of feline hyperaesthesia syndrome at home. Eighty per cent of the indoor-only cats and 65.3% of the outdoor cats had at least one behavioural sign (odds ratio 2.08, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 3.88). Thirty-one per cent of the cats reacted to lumbar palpation by veterinarians, and 18.7% of these cats were not reported to present signs of feline hyperaesthesia syndrome at home.
Clinical significance: In this population of healthy cats, 73.1% of cats consistently displayed at least one behavioural sign of feline hyperaesthesia syndrome at home. Adverse reactions after lumbar palpation by a veterinarian were also reported in healthy cats, including cats without behavioural signs at home. The results suggest that many of these behavioural signs have no diagnostic value in isolation. A scoring system could be used to differentiate cats with feline hyperaesthesia syndrome from cats with normal behaviour.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery.
In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world.
The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher.
The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association