Influencing Factors in Corneal Densitometry Recovery After Accelerated Cross-Linking for Keratoconus.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joph/9490950
Kuan-I Huang, Cyuan-Yi Yeh, Chao-Chien Hu, Sheng-Fu Cheng
{"title":"Influencing Factors in Corneal Densitometry Recovery After Accelerated Cross-Linking for Keratoconus.","authors":"Kuan-I Huang, Cyuan-Yi Yeh, Chao-Chien Hu, Sheng-Fu Cheng","doi":"10.1155/joph/9490950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines corneal densitometry recovery and influencing factors following accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus. Corneal densitometry, measured using Scheimpflug tomography, provides an objective assessment of corneal clarity, especially in tracking the resolution of postoperative haze. We conducted a retrospective case-control analysis of 24 patients (31 eyes) who underwent CXL with 0.25% riboflavin and 18 mW/cm<sup>2</sup> irradiation between 2021 and 2023. Variables included patient age, maximum keratometry (<i>K</i> <sub>max</sub>), central corneal thickness (CCT), and demarcation line depth (DLD), defined as the depth of the CXL region. Results revealed a significant increase in densitometry values across most corneal zones at 1-month postoperation, followed by a gradual return to baseline by 12 months. Notably, younger patients exhibited a faster recovery, with mean densitometry values returning to baseline in 11.4 months compared to 14.9 months in older patients (<i>p</i>=0.02). Similarly, corneas with deeper DLDs demonstrated faster densitometry recovery, suggesting a potentially more efficient corneal remodeling process. Additional analysis indicated a trend toward higher densitometry values in shallower DLDs at 1 month, although this difference was not statistically significant. These findings support the use of densitometry as a reliable measure of post-CXL healing. While DLD depth and patient age were associated with a faster recovery, they did not directly predict final corneal clarity. Our study suggests that factors such as age and DLD depth should be considered in patient prognosis, although further research is needed to confirm these findings across varying CXL protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":16674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9490950"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11991838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joph/9490950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines corneal densitometry recovery and influencing factors following accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus. Corneal densitometry, measured using Scheimpflug tomography, provides an objective assessment of corneal clarity, especially in tracking the resolution of postoperative haze. We conducted a retrospective case-control analysis of 24 patients (31 eyes) who underwent CXL with 0.25% riboflavin and 18 mW/cm2 irradiation between 2021 and 2023. Variables included patient age, maximum keratometry (K max), central corneal thickness (CCT), and demarcation line depth (DLD), defined as the depth of the CXL region. Results revealed a significant increase in densitometry values across most corneal zones at 1-month postoperation, followed by a gradual return to baseline by 12 months. Notably, younger patients exhibited a faster recovery, with mean densitometry values returning to baseline in 11.4 months compared to 14.9 months in older patients (p=0.02). Similarly, corneas with deeper DLDs demonstrated faster densitometry recovery, suggesting a potentially more efficient corneal remodeling process. Additional analysis indicated a trend toward higher densitometry values in shallower DLDs at 1 month, although this difference was not statistically significant. These findings support the use of densitometry as a reliable measure of post-CXL healing. While DLD depth and patient age were associated with a faster recovery, they did not directly predict final corneal clarity. Our study suggests that factors such as age and DLD depth should be considered in patient prognosis, although further research is needed to confirm these findings across varying CXL protocols.

圆锥角膜加速交联后角膜密度恢复的影响因素。
本研究探讨进展性圆锥角膜加速角膜交联(CXL)后角膜密度恢复及影响因素。使用Scheimpflug断层扫描测量的角膜密度测量,提供了对角膜清晰度的客观评估,特别是在跟踪术后雾霭的消退方面。我们对24例(31只眼)患者进行了回顾性病例对照分析,这些患者在2021年至2023年间接受了0.25%核黄素和18 mW/cm2照射的CXL。变量包括患者年龄、最大角膜度数(kmax)、角膜中央厚度(CCT)和分界线深度(DLD),定义为CXL区域的深度。结果显示,术后1个月,大多数角膜区域的密度测量值显著增加,随后12个月逐渐恢复到基线。值得注意的是,年轻患者恢复得更快,平均密度测量值在11.4个月恢复到基线,而老年患者为14.9个月(p=0.02)。同样,较深的dld的角膜显示出更快的密度恢复,这表明一个潜在的更有效的角膜重塑过程。另外的分析表明,在1个月时,较浅的dld有更高的密度测量值的趋势,尽管这种差异没有统计学意义。这些发现支持使用密度测量作为cxl后愈合的可靠测量。虽然DLD深度和患者年龄与更快的恢复有关,但它们不能直接预测最终的角膜清晰度。我们的研究表明,患者预后应考虑年龄和DLD深度等因素,尽管需要进一步的研究来证实不同CXL方案的这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal of Ophthalmology MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-OPHTHALMOLOGY
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the anatomy, physiology and diseases of the eye. Submissions should focus on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, as well as clinical trials and research findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信