Impact of Pre-lockdown Hyper-energy on Mood and Rhythm Dysregulation in Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Q2 Medicine
Diego Primavera, Goce Kalcev, Fabrizio Bert, Elisa Cantone, Alessandra Perra, Massimo Tusconi, Samantha Pinna, Germano Orrù, Alessandra Scano, Enzo Tramontano, Ivan Barbov, Marcello Nonnis, Antonio Egidio Nardi, Giulia Cossu, Federica Sancassiani, Mauro Giovanni Carta
{"title":"Impact of Pre-lockdown Hyper-energy on Mood and Rhythm Dysregulation in Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Diego Primavera, Goce Kalcev, Fabrizio Bert, Elisa Cantone, Alessandra Perra, Massimo Tusconi, Samantha Pinna, Germano Orrù, Alessandra Scano, Enzo Tramontano, Ivan Barbov, Marcello Nonnis, Antonio Egidio Nardi, Giulia Cossu, Federica Sancassiani, Mauro Giovanni Carta","doi":"10.2174/0117450179344148250206065104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this work is to verify whether a cohort of elderly people with hyper-energy tended to increase depressive symptoms and misaligned social and personal rhythms during the lockdown compared to a cohort of older adults without hyper-energy one year before the lockdown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The two cohorts were evaluated in April 2019 (T0) and in April 2020 (T1). Hyper-energy, cognitive performance, depressive symptoms, and social and personal rhythms were evaluated at T0 and T1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the measure of the Brief Social Rhythm Scale (BSRS) score, the differences between groups in the two observation times reach statistical significance. The sub-group with previous hyper-energy at T0 but no longer having hyper-energy at T1 increases the score by more than 5 points (a higher score indicates greater rhythm dysregulation, thus having a worse regulation of rhythms at T1), while in those individuals who didn't have hyper-energy, the score remains substantially unchanged (+0.06). However, if the increase in the score from T0 and T1 is measured, both groups with hyper-energy at T0 presented a greater mean increase compared to people who did not have hyper-energy at T1. In the total of the eleven elderly people with hyper-energy at T0, the mean increase in BSRS score was 1.05±1.19 versus 0.06±0.98 (F=9.407, P=0.003), and in people who no longer had hyper-energy at T1, it was 1.05±1.19 versus 5.50±3.83 (F=105.0, P<0.0001). In people with hyper-energy at T0, the mean increase in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score was 0.72±0.75 versus 0.01±0.28 (F=37.153, P<0.0001). The gain was even higher in people who no longer had hyper-energy at T1, 1.38±1.03 <i>vs</i>. 0.01±0.28 (F=87.386, P<0.0001). An inverse linear correlation was found between energy perception (measured as the score of Item 10 of SF-12) and the score of PHQ-9 measuring depressive symptoms both at T0 and, more strongly, at T1, as well as with the BSRS scores, but only at T1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study, despite the limitations of a small sample, seems to confirm a greater vulnerability to the lockdown situation in people with hyperactivity, even in the absence of psychopathology (i.e., part of the bipolar spectrum).</p>","PeriodicalId":35447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","volume":"21 ","pages":"e17450179344148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0117450179344148250206065104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this work is to verify whether a cohort of elderly people with hyper-energy tended to increase depressive symptoms and misaligned social and personal rhythms during the lockdown compared to a cohort of older adults without hyper-energy one year before the lockdown.

Methods: The two cohorts were evaluated in April 2019 (T0) and in April 2020 (T1). Hyper-energy, cognitive performance, depressive symptoms, and social and personal rhythms were evaluated at T0 and T1.

Results: In the measure of the Brief Social Rhythm Scale (BSRS) score, the differences between groups in the two observation times reach statistical significance. The sub-group with previous hyper-energy at T0 but no longer having hyper-energy at T1 increases the score by more than 5 points (a higher score indicates greater rhythm dysregulation, thus having a worse regulation of rhythms at T1), while in those individuals who didn't have hyper-energy, the score remains substantially unchanged (+0.06). However, if the increase in the score from T0 and T1 is measured, both groups with hyper-energy at T0 presented a greater mean increase compared to people who did not have hyper-energy at T1. In the total of the eleven elderly people with hyper-energy at T0, the mean increase in BSRS score was 1.05±1.19 versus 0.06±0.98 (F=9.407, P=0.003), and in people who no longer had hyper-energy at T1, it was 1.05±1.19 versus 5.50±3.83 (F=105.0, P<0.0001). In people with hyper-energy at T0, the mean increase in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score was 0.72±0.75 versus 0.01±0.28 (F=37.153, P<0.0001). The gain was even higher in people who no longer had hyper-energy at T1, 1.38±1.03 vs. 0.01±0.28 (F=87.386, P<0.0001). An inverse linear correlation was found between energy perception (measured as the score of Item 10 of SF-12) and the score of PHQ-9 measuring depressive symptoms both at T0 and, more strongly, at T1, as well as with the BSRS scores, but only at T1.

Conclusion: The study, despite the limitations of a small sample, seems to confirm a greater vulnerability to the lockdown situation in people with hyperactivity, even in the absence of psychopathology (i.e., part of the bipolar spectrum).

在COVID-19大流行期间,封锁前的高能量对老年人情绪和节奏失调的影响
目的:这项工作的目的是验证在封锁期间,与封锁前一年没有能量过剩的老年人相比,能量过剩的老年人群体是否倾向于增加抑郁症状和社会和个人节奏失调。方法:分别于2019年4月(T0)和2020年4月(T1)对两个队列进行评估。在T0和T1时评估精力充沛、认知表现、抑郁症状以及社会和个人节奏。结果:在短暂社会节律量表(BSRS)得分测量中,两组观察次数的差异均有统计学意义。在T0时有过能量亢进但在T1时不再有能量亢进的亚组得分提高5分以上(分数越高表明节律失调越严重,从而在T1时节律调节越差),而在没有能量亢进的个体中,得分基本保持不变(+0.06)。然而,如果从T0和T1开始测量得分的增加,那么在T0时能量过剩的两组都比在T1时没有能量过剩的人表现出更大的平均增长。11例T0时高能量患者BSRS评分平均升高1.05±1.19比0.06±0.98 (F=9.407, P=0.003), T1时无高能量患者BSRS评分平均升高1.05±1.19比5.50±3.83 (F=105.0, P= 0.01±0.28,F=87.386, P)。尽管样本有限,但这项研究似乎证实了多动症患者更容易受到封锁的影响,即使没有精神病理(即双相情感障碍的一部分)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health is an open access online journal, which publishes Research articles, Reviews, Letters in all areas of clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health covering the following topics: Clinical and epidemiological research in psychiatry and mental health; diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions; and frequencies and determinants of mental health conditions in the community and the populations at risk; research and economic aspects of psychiatry, with special attention given to manuscripts presenting new results and methods in the area; and clinical epidemiologic investigation of pharmaceutical agents. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, a peer reviewed journal, aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信