Validity and Reliability of the Tunisian Arabic Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) and Functional Outcome Factors in a Sample of Patients with Bipolar Disorder.

Q2 Medicine
Hend Jemli, Uta Ouali, Ons Maatouk, Ahlem Hajri, Azza Ben Cheikh Ahmed, Amina Aissa, Rabaa Jomli
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the Tunisian Arabic Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) and Functional Outcome Factors in a Sample of Patients with Bipolar Disorder.","authors":"Hend Jemli, Uta Ouali, Ons Maatouk, Ahlem Hajri, Azza Ben Cheikh Ahmed, Amina Aissa, Rabaa Jomli","doi":"10.2174/0117450179361739250203043410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bipolar disorders negatively impact functional outcomes and, consequently, prognosis. The Functioning Assessment Short Test is a reliable tool to evaluate functional outcomes in people with bipolar disorders.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to conduct a cross-cultural validation of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) and to explore correlations between functional impairment and sociodemographic and clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was carried out in a population of 60 bipolar patients and 60 healthy controls. The scales administered were the Global Functioning Assessment (GAF), the World Health Organization Quality Of Life-Bref (WHOQOL-BREF), the FAST, and a questionnaire containing sociodemographic and clinical variables. The validation study was based on face and content validity, reliability, and construct validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The face and content validity were satisfactory. The internal consistency obtained was high, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.785. All six FAST domains had significant correlations with each other and with the total score. The FAST assessment at baseline and week 2 were highly correlated (<i>p</i>>0.05), and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.998, indicating high test-retest reliability. The FAST total score was negatively and significantly associated with GAF (rho=-0.788, <i>p</i><0.001) and WHOQOL-BREF scores, suggesting good concurrent validity. The total FAST scores were significantly lower in controls as compared with bipolar patients (<i>p</i><0.001), with a cut-off at 26. Functional impairment was significantly associated with the following variables: low educational level, living alone, early age at onset, number of depressive episodes, and treatment associations (mood stabilizers and antipsychotics).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Tunisian Arabic version of the FAST demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and could be used to assess specific domains of functional impairment in people living with bipolar disorders and may be instrumental in implementing psychosocial and rehabilitation interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":35447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","volume":"21 ","pages":"e17450179361739"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0117450179361739250203043410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bipolar disorders negatively impact functional outcomes and, consequently, prognosis. The Functioning Assessment Short Test is a reliable tool to evaluate functional outcomes in people with bipolar disorders.

Aim: The aim of the study was to conduct a cross-cultural validation of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) and to explore correlations between functional impairment and sociodemographic and clinical variables.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in a population of 60 bipolar patients and 60 healthy controls. The scales administered were the Global Functioning Assessment (GAF), the World Health Organization Quality Of Life-Bref (WHOQOL-BREF), the FAST, and a questionnaire containing sociodemographic and clinical variables. The validation study was based on face and content validity, reliability, and construct validity.

Results: The face and content validity were satisfactory. The internal consistency obtained was high, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.785. All six FAST domains had significant correlations with each other and with the total score. The FAST assessment at baseline and week 2 were highly correlated (p>0.05), and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.998, indicating high test-retest reliability. The FAST total score was negatively and significantly associated with GAF (rho=-0.788, p<0.001) and WHOQOL-BREF scores, suggesting good concurrent validity. The total FAST scores were significantly lower in controls as compared with bipolar patients (p<0.001), with a cut-off at 26. Functional impairment was significantly associated with the following variables: low educational level, living alone, early age at onset, number of depressive episodes, and treatment associations (mood stabilizers and antipsychotics).

Conclusion: The Tunisian Arabic version of the FAST demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties and could be used to assess specific domains of functional impairment in people living with bipolar disorders and may be instrumental in implementing psychosocial and rehabilitation interventions.

突尼斯阿拉伯语功能评估短测试(FAST)和双相情感障碍患者功能结局因素的效度和信度
背景:双相情感障碍对功能结局和预后有负面影响。功能评估短测试是评估双相情感障碍患者功能结局的可靠工具。目的:本研究的目的是对功能评估短测试(FAST)进行跨文化验证,并探讨功能障碍与社会人口统计学和临床变量之间的相关性。方法:对60名双相情感障碍患者和60名健康对照者进行横断面研究。使用的量表是全球功能评估(GAF)、世界卫生组织生活质量评估(WHOQOL-BREF)、FAST和一份包含社会人口学和临床变量的问卷。验证研究的基础是面效度、内容效度、信度和结构效度。结果:面效度和内容效度满意。获得的内部一致性较高,Cronbach's alpha为0.785。所有六个FAST域彼此之间以及与总分之间都有显著的相关性。基线和第2周的FAST评估高度相关(p < 0.05),类内相关系数为0.998,重测信度高。FAST总分与GAF呈显著负相关(rho=-0.788, ppp)。结论:突尼斯阿拉伯语版FAST表现出令人满意的心理测量特性,可用于评估双相情感障碍患者特定领域的功能障碍,并可能有助于实施社会心理和康复干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health is an open access online journal, which publishes Research articles, Reviews, Letters in all areas of clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health covering the following topics: Clinical and epidemiological research in psychiatry and mental health; diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions; and frequencies and determinants of mental health conditions in the community and the populations at risk; research and economic aspects of psychiatry, with special attention given to manuscripts presenting new results and methods in the area; and clinical epidemiologic investigation of pharmaceutical agents. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, a peer reviewed journal, aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信