A Diagnostic Stewardship Success: Implementing a Urine Culture Reflex Policy in the Emergency Department of a Large Safety-Net Hospital.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-04-16 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf228
Joslyn Strebe, Emily Wong, Rosalind Ma, Jackie Nguyen, Michael Dang, Kristi Morgan, Shawn Hall, Bonnie C Prokesch
{"title":"A Diagnostic Stewardship Success: Implementing a Urine Culture Reflex Policy in the Emergency Department of a Large Safety-Net Hospital.","authors":"Joslyn Strebe, Emily Wong, Rosalind Ma, Jackie Nguyen, Michael Dang, Kristi Morgan, Shawn Hall, Bonnie C Prokesch","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urinalyses and urine cultures (UCs) are frequently ordered simultaneously in emergency departments (EDs) to increase efficiency and decrease triaging times. However, this often comes at the cost of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of urinary tract infections. Our study examines the rates of UC orders and hospital savings after implementation of a reflex UC system in a large safety-net county hospital ED. Differences in rates of antibiotic use are also described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The electronic medical records of eligible patients were analyzed before and after implementation of a reflex UC ordering system, and rates of UC processing were documented to estimate savings to the hospital and the healthcare payer. As a secondary analysis, 7 days of medical records both before and after intervention were reviewed to describe absolute rates of antibiotic prescribing and adverse events attributed to antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis of 9 months after initiation of a reflex UC protocol revealed a decrease in the average of monthly cultures processed by 20.3%, resulting in a hospital cost savings of $425 000 with savings to the healthcare payer on the order of $5 650 000 in prevented cultures alone. Secondary analysis revealed a small but not statistically significant decrease in the number of antibiotics prescribed after intervention (from 40.76% to 38.11%) with similar rates of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a reflex UC protocol in the ED of a large safety-net hospital resulted in a decrease of the number of cultures being processed, leading to substantial healthcare savings, which is particularly important in a resource-limited setting. While the implementation of the protocol resulted in cost savings due to diagnostic stewardship, the impact of such a protocol on antibiotic stewardship requires further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 5","pages":"ofaf228"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urinalyses and urine cultures (UCs) are frequently ordered simultaneously in emergency departments (EDs) to increase efficiency and decrease triaging times. However, this often comes at the cost of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of urinary tract infections. Our study examines the rates of UC orders and hospital savings after implementation of a reflex UC system in a large safety-net county hospital ED. Differences in rates of antibiotic use are also described.

Methods: The electronic medical records of eligible patients were analyzed before and after implementation of a reflex UC ordering system, and rates of UC processing were documented to estimate savings to the hospital and the healthcare payer. As a secondary analysis, 7 days of medical records both before and after intervention were reviewed to describe absolute rates of antibiotic prescribing and adverse events attributed to antibiotics.

Results: Data analysis of 9 months after initiation of a reflex UC protocol revealed a decrease in the average of monthly cultures processed by 20.3%, resulting in a hospital cost savings of $425 000 with savings to the healthcare payer on the order of $5 650 000 in prevented cultures alone. Secondary analysis revealed a small but not statistically significant decrease in the number of antibiotics prescribed after intervention (from 40.76% to 38.11%) with similar rates of adverse effects.

Conclusions: Implementation of a reflex UC protocol in the ED of a large safety-net hospital resulted in a decrease of the number of cultures being processed, leading to substantial healthcare savings, which is particularly important in a resource-limited setting. While the implementation of the protocol resulted in cost savings due to diagnostic stewardship, the impact of such a protocol on antibiotic stewardship requires further study.

诊断管理的成功:在一家大型安全网医院急诊科实施尿液培养反射政策。
背景:为了提高效率和减少分诊时间,急诊科经常同时要求进行尿液分析和尿液培养。然而,这往往是以过度诊断和过度治疗尿路感染为代价的。我们的研究考察了在大型安全网县医院急诊科实施反射性UC系统后的UC订单率和医院储蓄。还描述了抗生素使用率的差异。方法:对符合条件的患者在实施反射性UC订购系统前后的电子病历进行分析,并记录UC处理率,以估计医院和医疗支付者的节省。作为辅助分析,研究人员回顾了干预前后7天的医疗记录,以描述抗生素处方的绝对比率和抗生素引起的不良事件。结果:在启动反射性UC方案9个月后的数据分析显示,每月处理的培养平均减少了20.3%,导致医院成本节省42.5万美元,仅预防培养就为医疗保健支付者节省了565万美元。二级分析显示,干预后抗生素处方数量减少(从40.76%降至38.11%),不良反应发生率相似,但没有统计学意义。结论:在一家大型安全网医院的急诊科实施反射性UC方案,减少了正在处理的培养数量,从而节省了大量的医疗费用,这在资源有限的情况下尤为重要。虽然该协议的实施由于诊断管理而节省了成本,但这种协议对抗生素管理的影响需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信