Olfactory training using nasal inserts is more effective due to increased adherence.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
A L Winter, S Henecke, E Thunell, M Swartz, J Martinsen, P Sahlstrand Johnson, J N Lundström
{"title":"Olfactory training using nasal inserts is more effective due to increased adherence.","authors":"A L Winter, S Henecke, E Thunell, M Swartz, J Martinsen, P Sahlstrand Johnson, J N Lundström","doi":"10.4193/Rhin10.4193/Rhin24.369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recommended treatment for hyposmia (a clinically reduced sense of smell) is olfactory training using odor containers that the patients smell twice a day for several weeks. Adherence to the olfactory training regimen is, however, generally low. We aimed to investigate if a new form of odor delivery, using scented nasal inserts, could enhance adherence to olfactory training by allowing participants to be mobile during the training and thereby lower the perceived intrusion on everyday life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a randomized controlled parallel-group design, individuals (N = 116) with hyposmia underwent 8 weeks of olfactory training. One group was assigned olfactory training using scented nasal inserts (nasal devices that retain nasal patency) while the other group was assigned the standard care regimen currently recommended by the Swedish healthcare system. We assessed objective and subjective olfactory ability before and after olfactory training as well as adherence to training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups significantly improved both their objective and subjective olfactory abilities, and training with nasal inserts produced similar improvement as standard care in overall treatment outcome. However, there was a significantly greater increase in discrimination performance and lower dropout rate (6.7%) in the nasal insert compared to the standard care group (23.2%). Critically, after exclusion of the drop-out participants, the nasal insert group still showed significantly higher adherence to the training regimen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Olfactory training with nasal inserts could serve as a more effective form of treatment for hyposmia due to patients' improved adherence to protocol and increased tendency to finish their treatment regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin10.4193/Rhin24.369","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The recommended treatment for hyposmia (a clinically reduced sense of smell) is olfactory training using odor containers that the patients smell twice a day for several weeks. Adherence to the olfactory training regimen is, however, generally low. We aimed to investigate if a new form of odor delivery, using scented nasal inserts, could enhance adherence to olfactory training by allowing participants to be mobile during the training and thereby lower the perceived intrusion on everyday life.

Methods: Using a randomized controlled parallel-group design, individuals (N = 116) with hyposmia underwent 8 weeks of olfactory training. One group was assigned olfactory training using scented nasal inserts (nasal devices that retain nasal patency) while the other group was assigned the standard care regimen currently recommended by the Swedish healthcare system. We assessed objective and subjective olfactory ability before and after olfactory training as well as adherence to training.

Results: Both groups significantly improved both their objective and subjective olfactory abilities, and training with nasal inserts produced similar improvement as standard care in overall treatment outcome. However, there was a significantly greater increase in discrimination performance and lower dropout rate (6.7%) in the nasal insert compared to the standard care group (23.2%). Critically, after exclusion of the drop-out participants, the nasal insert group still showed significantly higher adherence to the training regimen.

Conclusions: Olfactory training with nasal inserts could serve as a more effective form of treatment for hyposmia due to patients' improved adherence to protocol and increased tendency to finish their treatment regimen.

嗅觉训练使用鼻插入物更有效,因为增加了依从性。
背景:推荐治疗嗅觉减退(临床嗅觉减退)的方法是使用气味容器进行嗅觉训练,患者每天闻两次,持续数周。然而,对嗅觉训练方案的坚持度通常很低。我们的目的是研究一种新的气味传递形式,即使用气味鼻插入物,是否可以通过允许参与者在训练期间移动来增强对嗅觉训练的依从性,从而降低对日常生活的干扰。方法:采用随机对照平行组设计,对116例低嗅觉患者进行为期8周的嗅觉训练。其中一组接受嗅觉训练,使用香味鼻植入物(保持鼻腔通畅的鼻装置),而另一组接受瑞典医疗保健系统目前推荐的标准护理方案。我们在嗅觉训练前后评估客观和主观嗅觉能力以及对训练的依从性。结果:两组患者的主观和客观嗅觉能力均有显著提高,鼻植入物训练在整体治疗效果上与标准治疗效果相似。然而,与标准护理组(23.2%)相比,鼻插入物的识别性能显著提高,辍学率(6.7%)更低。至关重要的是,在排除了退出参与者后,鼻腔插入组仍然表现出明显更高的训练方案依从性。结论:由于患者对治疗方案的依从性提高,完成治疗方案的倾向增加,鼻腔插入的嗅觉训练可以作为治疗低氧症的更有效的形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信