3D gamma analysis between treatment plans for nominally beam-matched medical linear accelerators using PyMedPhys.

Q4 Medicine
Precision Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-27 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/pro6.1247
Fada Guan, William Donahue, Simon Biggs, Matthew Jennings, Emily Draeger, Huixiao Chen, Yuenan Wang, Ngoc Nguyen, David J Carlson, Zhe Chen, Dae Yup Han
{"title":"3D gamma analysis between treatment plans for nominally beam-matched medical linear accelerators using PyMedPhys.","authors":"Fada Guan, William Donahue, Simon Biggs, Matthew Jennings, Emily Draeger, Huixiao Chen, Yuenan Wang, Ngoc Nguyen, David J Carlson, Zhe Chen, Dae Yup Han","doi":"10.1002/pro6.1247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Beam-matched linear accelerators (linacs) enable flexible patient scheduling and efficient treatment delivery in the event of unexpected machine downtime. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of 3D gamma index as an additional metric beyond standard measurement-based comparisons for more efficient evaluation of treatment plans between linacs with nominally matched beam models to ensure safe patient transfer. Seventeen 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) plans and thirty-six volumetric-modulated radiation therapy (VMAT) plans for different disease sites were selected from the original linac. An in-house script was used to automatically create new plans for the target linac and calculate dose using parameters of the original plans. 3D gamma analysis was performed to compare plan dose distributions between the target and original linacs using <i>PyMedPhys</i>. The 2%/2 mm gamma pass (γ≤1) rate was >99.99% for all 3DCRT plans. The median 1%/1 mm pass rate was 99.86% but two cases failed (< 90%). For VMAT plans, the median and minimum 2%/2 mm gamma pass rates were 99.43% and 93.81%. For 1%/1 mm, the median pass rate was 92.02% but ten cases failed. The results indicated using 3D gamma index can enhance the confidence and add an extra layer for safe patient transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":32406,"journal":{"name":"Precision Radiation Oncology","volume":"8 4","pages":"191-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro6.1247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beam-matched linear accelerators (linacs) enable flexible patient scheduling and efficient treatment delivery in the event of unexpected machine downtime. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of 3D gamma index as an additional metric beyond standard measurement-based comparisons for more efficient evaluation of treatment plans between linacs with nominally matched beam models to ensure safe patient transfer. Seventeen 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) plans and thirty-six volumetric-modulated radiation therapy (VMAT) plans for different disease sites were selected from the original linac. An in-house script was used to automatically create new plans for the target linac and calculate dose using parameters of the original plans. 3D gamma analysis was performed to compare plan dose distributions between the target and original linacs using PyMedPhys. The 2%/2 mm gamma pass (γ≤1) rate was >99.99% for all 3DCRT plans. The median 1%/1 mm pass rate was 99.86% but two cases failed (< 90%). For VMAT plans, the median and minimum 2%/2 mm gamma pass rates were 99.43% and 93.81%. For 1%/1 mm, the median pass rate was 92.02% but ten cases failed. The results indicated using 3D gamma index can enhance the confidence and add an extra layer for safe patient transfer.

使用PyMedPhys对名义上光束匹配的医用线性加速器治疗方案之间的三维伽玛分析。
光束匹配线性加速器(linacs)可以在机器意外停机的情况下实现灵活的患者调度和高效的治疗交付。本研究的目的是测试3D伽马指数作为标准测量基础比较之外的额外度量的可行性,以更有效地评估具有名义上匹配的光束模型的直线加速器之间的治疗计划,以确保患者安全转移。从原直线中选择17个三维适形放疗(3DCRT)方案和36个体积调制放疗(VMAT)方案,针对不同的疾病部位。使用内部脚本为目标直线自动创建新计划,并使用原始计划的参数计算剂量。使用PyMedPhys进行三维伽玛分析,比较目标和原始直线之间的计划剂量分布。所有3DCRT方案的2%/2 mm γ及格率(γ≤1)均为99.99%。1%/1 mm合格率中位数为99.86%,2例不合格率< 90%。对于VMAT方案,2%/ 2mm伽玛射线的中位通过率和最小通过率分别为99.43%和93.81%。1%/1 mm中位通过率为92.02%,不合格者10例。结果表明,使用三维伽马指数可以增强信心,为患者的安全转移增加额外的一层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Precision Radiation Oncology
Precision Radiation Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信