Psychological interventions for externalising behaviours following paediatric traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and clinical practice recommendations.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Impairment Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1071/IB24092
Benjamin D Diplock, Alexey Urusov, Alisa Torchia, Gary R Turner, Mary E Desrocher
{"title":"Psychological interventions for externalising behaviours following paediatric traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and clinical practice recommendations.","authors":"Benjamin D Diplock, Alexey Urusov, Alisa Torchia, Gary R Turner, Mary E Desrocher","doi":"10.1071/IB24092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective To identify and examine whether evidence-based psychological interventions reduce externalising behaviours in persons who sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI) in childhood and adolescence. Methods This systematic review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Five electronic databases (i.e. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE and ERIC) were systematically searched, with publication dates ranging from 1946 to February 2025. Terms, such as 'TBI', 'externalising', 'aggression', and 'paediatric', were employed in the search. Results The overall searches returned 3551 articles. Of the total, 535 duplicates were excluded, and 2973 records were excluded through screening titles and abstracts. Seventy studies met preliminary established criteria. Of these, 10 studies met inclusion criteria; one (10%) was a nonrandomised study (quasi-experimental design), six (60%) were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with one-group comparison and three (30%) were RCTs with two-group comparison. Conclusions Despite a limited number of studies, five preliminary clinical practice recommendations were developed. Specifically, this review has identified Family Problem-Solving Therapy and Teen Online Problem Solving as having potential efficacy for adolescence to emerging adulthood (moderate to severe TBI) and late childhood to adolescence (mild to severe TBI) age groups. Additional clinical and methodological implications, along with limitations and future directions, are considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"26 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To identify and examine whether evidence-based psychological interventions reduce externalising behaviours in persons who sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI) in childhood and adolescence. Methods This systematic review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Five electronic databases (i.e. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE and ERIC) were systematically searched, with publication dates ranging from 1946 to February 2025. Terms, such as 'TBI', 'externalising', 'aggression', and 'paediatric', were employed in the search. Results The overall searches returned 3551 articles. Of the total, 535 duplicates were excluded, and 2973 records were excluded through screening titles and abstracts. Seventy studies met preliminary established criteria. Of these, 10 studies met inclusion criteria; one (10%) was a nonrandomised study (quasi-experimental design), six (60%) were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with one-group comparison and three (30%) were RCTs with two-group comparison. Conclusions Despite a limited number of studies, five preliminary clinical practice recommendations were developed. Specifically, this review has identified Family Problem-Solving Therapy and Teen Online Problem Solving as having potential efficacy for adolescence to emerging adulthood (moderate to severe TBI) and late childhood to adolescence (mild to severe TBI) age groups. Additional clinical and methodological implications, along with limitations and future directions, are considered.

儿童外伤性脑损伤后外化行为的心理干预:系统回顾和临床实践建议。
目的探讨基于证据的心理干预是否能减少儿童期和青春期创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的外化行为。方法本系统评价采用系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。系统检索5个电子数据库(MEDLINE、PsycINFO、PubMed、EMBASE和ERIC),出版日期从1946年到2025年2月。搜索中使用了诸如“TBI”、“外化”、“侵略”和“儿科”等术语。结果总体检索结果为3551篇。其中,通过筛选标题和摘要排除重复535项,排除2973项记录。70项研究符合初步确定的标准。其中,10项研究符合纳入标准;1项(10%)为非随机研究(准实验设计),6项(60%)为一组比较的随机对照试验(rct), 3项(30%)为两组比较的随机对照试验(rct)。尽管研究数量有限,但仍提出了5项初步临床实践建议。具体而言,本综述确定了家庭问题解决疗法和青少年在线问题解决方法对青春期至成年初期(中度至重度TBI)和儿童期晚期至青春期(轻度至重度TBI)年龄组具有潜在疗效。考虑了其他临床和方法学意义,以及局限性和未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Impairment
Brain Impairment CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal addresses topics related to the aetiology, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of brain impairment with a particular focus on the implications for functional status, participation, rehabilitation and quality of life. Disciplines reflect a broad multidisciplinary scope and include neuroscience, neurology, neuropsychology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech pathology, social work, and nursing. Submissions are welcome across the full range of conditions that affect brain function (stroke, tumour, progressive neurological illnesses, dementia, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc.) throughout the lifespan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信