BiancaMaria Di Bello, Camilla Panacci, Sveva Montesano, Raffaele Costanzo, Luca Boccacci, Merve Aydin, Andrea Casella, Stefania Lucia, Francesca Strappini, Francesco Di Russo, Sabrina Pitzalis
{"title":"Effects of Walking on Anticipatory Brain Processing During a Concurrent Cognitive Task.","authors":"BiancaMaria Di Bello, Camilla Panacci, Sveva Montesano, Raffaele Costanzo, Luca Boccacci, Merve Aydin, Andrea Casella, Stefania Lucia, Francesca Strappini, Francesco Di Russo, Sabrina Pitzalis","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motor and cognitive processes influence each other. Dual-task studies have shown that walking, in particular, may impact performance during cognitive tasks. However, the existing literature shows inconsistent results; changes in performance have been reported to be sometimes ameliorative, sometimes neutral, and at other times detrimental to both cognitive and motor functions. The present study aims to investigate the effects of walking on the motor and cognitive brain processes that underlie task anticipation during a visual discrimination cognitive task. For this purpose, event-related potentials were recorded under two conditions: static standing and walking on the treadmill while participants executed a cognitive task. The presence of optic flow was also controlled to assess its effect on realistic walking. The results show that walking enhanced both motor and cognitive preparation processes, improving response speed and accuracy. This effect may suggest that walking during the execution of a visuomotor cognitive task may not interfere with task preparation and even result in increased cortical activation in prefrontal and premotor areas, thereby improving cognitive performance. Furthermore, the presence of optic flow was found to enhance motor preparation and reduce response time, supporting the efficacy of more realistic walking conditions. However, the presence of a flow field also reduced cognitive preparation and accuracy, likely due to the increased cognitive load associated with concurrent visual information. These findings support the \"multiple resources theory,\" which posits that during dual tasks that do not interfere with each other, the brain can optimize cortical integration and enhance both cognitive and motor resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 5","pages":"e70063"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Motor and cognitive processes influence each other. Dual-task studies have shown that walking, in particular, may impact performance during cognitive tasks. However, the existing literature shows inconsistent results; changes in performance have been reported to be sometimes ameliorative, sometimes neutral, and at other times detrimental to both cognitive and motor functions. The present study aims to investigate the effects of walking on the motor and cognitive brain processes that underlie task anticipation during a visual discrimination cognitive task. For this purpose, event-related potentials were recorded under two conditions: static standing and walking on the treadmill while participants executed a cognitive task. The presence of optic flow was also controlled to assess its effect on realistic walking. The results show that walking enhanced both motor and cognitive preparation processes, improving response speed and accuracy. This effect may suggest that walking during the execution of a visuomotor cognitive task may not interfere with task preparation and even result in increased cortical activation in prefrontal and premotor areas, thereby improving cognitive performance. Furthermore, the presence of optic flow was found to enhance motor preparation and reduce response time, supporting the efficacy of more realistic walking conditions. However, the presence of a flow field also reduced cognitive preparation and accuracy, likely due to the increased cognitive load associated with concurrent visual information. These findings support the "multiple resources theory," which posits that during dual tasks that do not interfere with each other, the brain can optimize cortical integration and enhance both cognitive and motor resources.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.