Assessment of perceptions, barriers and enablers towards uptake of research activities among undergraduate medical students: A mixed methods study.

Prateek Bobhate, Shivasakthy Manivasakan, Saurabh Rambiharilal Shrivastava
{"title":"Assessment of perceptions, barriers and enablers towards uptake of research activities among undergraduate medical students: A mixed methods study.","authors":"Prateek Bobhate, Shivasakthy Manivasakan, Saurabh Rambiharilal Shrivastava","doi":"10.25259/NMJI_762_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Medical research, even though, an integral part of medical education, remains the most neglected domain in the medical curriculum in most medical colleges across India. Research, when introduced in the medical curriculum, gives an early opportunity to medical students to participate in it. We did a study to gain an insight into the perceptions of medical students and explored barriers and enablers towards uptake of research activities. Methods A mixed methods study was done over 9 months using a pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire and a focus group discussion among medical students. First, a quantitative survey was done using Google forms to assess students perception and attitude towards research. This was followed by 2 focused group discussions to explore the barriers and enablers towards uptake of research activities. Descriptive analysis was done for quantitative data and manual thematic content analysis for qualitative data. Results A total of 350 participants responded to the survey out of which 168 (59.1%) were women. Most students (339; 96.9%) perceived research to be important. Also, 313 (89.4%) and 245 (70%) showed willingness to attend research methodology workshops and conduct research studies, respectively. A manual thematic content analysis of the focus group discussion revealed two main themes: (i) barriers to conduct of research and (ii) enablers towards uptake of research. The major barriers were lack of knowledge about conducting research and lack of time and financial constraints. The enablers were conduct of periodic research methodology workshops and adequate mentoring by faculty. Conclusion There is a gap in the existing knowledge and practice in undergraduate medical research. Our study ascertained potential barriers as well as enablers for enhancing research activities by medical students. Adequate institutional support including funding for research coupled with proper mentoring by faculty and family support is crucial to foster a positive research culture among undergraduate medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":519891,"journal":{"name":"The National medical journal of India","volume":"37 6","pages":"339-344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National medical journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/NMJI_762_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Medical research, even though, an integral part of medical education, remains the most neglected domain in the medical curriculum in most medical colleges across India. Research, when introduced in the medical curriculum, gives an early opportunity to medical students to participate in it. We did a study to gain an insight into the perceptions of medical students and explored barriers and enablers towards uptake of research activities. Methods A mixed methods study was done over 9 months using a pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire and a focus group discussion among medical students. First, a quantitative survey was done using Google forms to assess students perception and attitude towards research. This was followed by 2 focused group discussions to explore the barriers and enablers towards uptake of research activities. Descriptive analysis was done for quantitative data and manual thematic content analysis for qualitative data. Results A total of 350 participants responded to the survey out of which 168 (59.1%) were women. Most students (339; 96.9%) perceived research to be important. Also, 313 (89.4%) and 245 (70%) showed willingness to attend research methodology workshops and conduct research studies, respectively. A manual thematic content analysis of the focus group discussion revealed two main themes: (i) barriers to conduct of research and (ii) enablers towards uptake of research. The major barriers were lack of knowledge about conducting research and lack of time and financial constraints. The enablers were conduct of periodic research methodology workshops and adequate mentoring by faculty. Conclusion There is a gap in the existing knowledge and practice in undergraduate medical research. Our study ascertained potential barriers as well as enablers for enhancing research activities by medical students. Adequate institutional support including funding for research coupled with proper mentoring by faculty and family support is crucial to foster a positive research culture among undergraduate medical students.

对医科本科生参与研究活动的看法、障碍和促进因素的评估:一项混合方法研究。
尽管医学研究是医学教育的一个组成部分,但在印度大多数医学院的医学课程中,它仍然是最被忽视的领域。在医学课程中引入研究,为医学生提供了早期参与研究的机会。我们进行了一项研究,以深入了解医学生的看法,并探讨了参与研究活动的障碍和促进因素。方法采用预试半结构化问卷和焦点小组讨论的混合方法,在医学生中进行为期9个月的研究。首先,使用谷歌表格进行定量调查,以评估学生对研究的看法和态度。随后进行了两次重点小组讨论,探讨了开展研究活动的障碍和推动因素。定量数据采用描述性分析,定性数据采用手工专题内容分析。结果共有350人参与调查,其中女性168人(59.1%)。大多数学生(339人;96.9%)认为研究很重要。此外,313人(89.4%)和245人(70%)表示愿意参加研究方法研讨会和开展研究。焦点小组讨论的手册专题内容分析揭示了两个主要主题:(i)进行研究的障碍和(ii)促进吸收研究的因素。主要的障碍是缺乏进行研究的知识以及缺乏时间和资金限制。促成因素是定期的研究方法研讨会和教师的充分指导。结论本科医学科研存在着知识与实践的差距。我们的研究确定了加强医学生研究活动的潜在障碍和促进因素。充分的机构支持,包括研究经费,加上教师的适当指导和家庭支持,对于在医科本科生中培养积极的研究文化至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信