Intralesional cryotherapy for treatment of keloid scars: patient-reported outcomes.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Kiran Dhaliwal, Tae Parks, Colin Brewster, Shivram Singh
{"title":"Intralesional cryotherapy for treatment of keloid scars: patient-reported outcomes.","authors":"Kiran Dhaliwal, Tae Parks, Colin Brewster, Shivram Singh","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2021.0087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Keloid scars are extremely difficult to treat with current therapy options, such as surgical excision and steroids, and have high recurrence rates. Intralesional cryotherapy is a relatively new treatment modality that uses a double-lumen needle to freeze the scar from the core, outwards. Evidence from the literature supports its use, with recurrence rates reported between 0-23%. The aim of this study was to assess patient-reported outcomes of keloid scar treatment with intralesional cryotherapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>All patients who had undergone intralesional cryotherapy, with a minimum follow-up period of six weeks were asked to complete a questionnaire. Patients were asked to rate the appearance of their scar and severity of their symptoms on a Visual Analogue Scale. They also reported any side-effects, complications and whether they would recommend the treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 patients were included between 2017 and 2019. All patients reported an improvement in scar appearance and 91% of patients reported an improvement in pain, with an average 3.75-point reduction in pain scores. All patients would recommend the treatment. Hypopigmentation was the most frequently reported side-effect and was most common in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types V and VI. A second treatment was required by three patients; all three had keloid scarring on the anterior chest and had previously had multiple courses of steroids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of our study appears to support the use of intralesional cryotherapy for the treatment of keloid scarring, with high patient satisfaction rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 Sup4a","pages":"xliv-xlviii"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.0087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Keloid scars are extremely difficult to treat with current therapy options, such as surgical excision and steroids, and have high recurrence rates. Intralesional cryotherapy is a relatively new treatment modality that uses a double-lumen needle to freeze the scar from the core, outwards. Evidence from the literature supports its use, with recurrence rates reported between 0-23%. The aim of this study was to assess patient-reported outcomes of keloid scar treatment with intralesional cryotherapy.

Method: All patients who had undergone intralesional cryotherapy, with a minimum follow-up period of six weeks were asked to complete a questionnaire. Patients were asked to rate the appearance of their scar and severity of their symptoms on a Visual Analogue Scale. They also reported any side-effects, complications and whether they would recommend the treatment.

Results: A total of 52 patients were included between 2017 and 2019. All patients reported an improvement in scar appearance and 91% of patients reported an improvement in pain, with an average 3.75-point reduction in pain scores. All patients would recommend the treatment. Hypopigmentation was the most frequently reported side-effect and was most common in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types V and VI. A second treatment was required by three patients; all three had keloid scarring on the anterior chest and had previously had multiple courses of steroids.

Conclusion: The findings of our study appears to support the use of intralesional cryotherapy for the treatment of keloid scarring, with high patient satisfaction rates.

病灶内冷冻疗法治疗瘢痕疙瘩:患者报告的结果。
目的:瘢痕疙瘩疤痕是非常难以治疗的现有治疗方案,如手术切除和类固醇,并有很高的复发率。病灶内冷冻疗法是一种相对较新的治疗方式,它使用双腔针从核心向外冷冻疤痕。文献证据支持其使用,复发率在0-23%之间。本研究的目的是评估病灶内冷冻治疗瘢痕疙瘩的患者报告的结果。方法:所有接受病灶内冷冻治疗的患者,至少随访6周,填写一份调查问卷。患者被要求对疤痕的外观和症状的严重程度进行视觉模拟评分。他们还报告了任何副作用、并发症以及他们是否会推荐这种治疗方法。结果:2017 - 2019年共纳入52例患者。所有患者报告疤痕外观改善,91%的患者报告疼痛改善,疼痛评分平均降低3.75分。所有患者都会推荐这种治疗方法。低色素沉着是最常见的副作用,最常见于菲茨帕特里克皮肤V型和VI型患者。三名患者需要第二次治疗;这三名患者的前胸部都有瘢痕疙瘩,并且此前曾接受过多次类固醇治疗。结论:我们的研究结果似乎支持使用病灶内冷冻疗法治疗瘢痕疙瘩,患者满意度高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信