Kiran Dhaliwal, Tae Parks, Colin Brewster, Shivram Singh
{"title":"Intralesional cryotherapy for treatment of keloid scars: patient-reported outcomes.","authors":"Kiran Dhaliwal, Tae Parks, Colin Brewster, Shivram Singh","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2021.0087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Keloid scars are extremely difficult to treat with current therapy options, such as surgical excision and steroids, and have high recurrence rates. Intralesional cryotherapy is a relatively new treatment modality that uses a double-lumen needle to freeze the scar from the core, outwards. Evidence from the literature supports its use, with recurrence rates reported between 0-23%. The aim of this study was to assess patient-reported outcomes of keloid scar treatment with intralesional cryotherapy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>All patients who had undergone intralesional cryotherapy, with a minimum follow-up period of six weeks were asked to complete a questionnaire. Patients were asked to rate the appearance of their scar and severity of their symptoms on a Visual Analogue Scale. They also reported any side-effects, complications and whether they would recommend the treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 patients were included between 2017 and 2019. All patients reported an improvement in scar appearance and 91% of patients reported an improvement in pain, with an average 3.75-point reduction in pain scores. All patients would recommend the treatment. Hypopigmentation was the most frequently reported side-effect and was most common in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types V and VI. A second treatment was required by three patients; all three had keloid scarring on the anterior chest and had previously had multiple courses of steroids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of our study appears to support the use of intralesional cryotherapy for the treatment of keloid scarring, with high patient satisfaction rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 Sup4a","pages":"xliv-xlviii"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.0087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Keloid scars are extremely difficult to treat with current therapy options, such as surgical excision and steroids, and have high recurrence rates. Intralesional cryotherapy is a relatively new treatment modality that uses a double-lumen needle to freeze the scar from the core, outwards. Evidence from the literature supports its use, with recurrence rates reported between 0-23%. The aim of this study was to assess patient-reported outcomes of keloid scar treatment with intralesional cryotherapy.
Method: All patients who had undergone intralesional cryotherapy, with a minimum follow-up period of six weeks were asked to complete a questionnaire. Patients were asked to rate the appearance of their scar and severity of their symptoms on a Visual Analogue Scale. They also reported any side-effects, complications and whether they would recommend the treatment.
Results: A total of 52 patients were included between 2017 and 2019. All patients reported an improvement in scar appearance and 91% of patients reported an improvement in pain, with an average 3.75-point reduction in pain scores. All patients would recommend the treatment. Hypopigmentation was the most frequently reported side-effect and was most common in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types V and VI. A second treatment was required by three patients; all three had keloid scarring on the anterior chest and had previously had multiple courses of steroids.
Conclusion: The findings of our study appears to support the use of intralesional cryotherapy for the treatment of keloid scarring, with high patient satisfaction rates.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice.
In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers.
Specifically, JWC publishes:
High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more
The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide
In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments
Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds
Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness
Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.