Diagnostic Accuracy of an Orofacial Scale for the Detection of Orofacial Myofunctional Disorders in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnoea.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gislaine Aparecida Folha, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira Valera, Cláudia Maria de Felício
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of an Orofacial Scale for the Detection of Orofacial Myofunctional Disorders in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnoea.","authors":"Gislaine Aparecida Folha, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira Valera, Cláudia Maria de Felício","doi":"10.1111/joor.13996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are known to have orofacial myofunctional disorders (OMD) compared to healthy individuals. Consequently, treatment with oropharyngeal exercises has shown promise in some OSA cases. However, this requires an adequate orofacial myofunctional evaluation.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop a concise and reliable scale including the most relevant items for the orofacial myofunctional evaluation of individuals with OSA. The Expanded Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES-E) protocol was previously validated for this purpose. However, it has been criticised for its length, time-consuming nature and omission of certain items.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Fifty adults diagnosed with OSA by polysomnography and 23 healthy adults were included. Based on the literature, additional items were incorporated into the OMES-E to enhance the evaluation (OMES-E Plus), with subsequent reliability analysis. A scale with fewer items was derived from the OMES-E Plus based on reliability and correlation analyses. Its accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were determined in a sample of 19 subjects with OSA and 19 without OSA (Control), matched for age and sex. Statistical analyses included Cronbach's alpha, item-total correlations and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The resulting new instrument, named the Orofacial Scale for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OFSOSA), comprises 31 items. The OFSOSA demonstrated significant discriminatory ability, with an area under the curve of 0.987, sensitivity of 95.5% and specificity of 93.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The OFSOSA, a concise instrument for myofunctional orofacial evaluation, was developed and validated, showing excellent psychometric properties for diagnosing OMDs in OSA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13996","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are known to have orofacial myofunctional disorders (OMD) compared to healthy individuals. Consequently, treatment with oropharyngeal exercises has shown promise in some OSA cases. However, this requires an adequate orofacial myofunctional evaluation.

Aims: To develop a concise and reliable scale including the most relevant items for the orofacial myofunctional evaluation of individuals with OSA. The Expanded Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES-E) protocol was previously validated for this purpose. However, it has been criticised for its length, time-consuming nature and omission of certain items.

Materials & methods: Fifty adults diagnosed with OSA by polysomnography and 23 healthy adults were included. Based on the literature, additional items were incorporated into the OMES-E to enhance the evaluation (OMES-E Plus), with subsequent reliability analysis. A scale with fewer items was derived from the OMES-E Plus based on reliability and correlation analyses. Its accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were determined in a sample of 19 subjects with OSA and 19 without OSA (Control), matched for age and sex. Statistical analyses included Cronbach's alpha, item-total correlations and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: The resulting new instrument, named the Orofacial Scale for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OFSOSA), comprises 31 items. The OFSOSA demonstrated significant discriminatory ability, with an area under the curve of 0.987, sensitivity of 95.5% and specificity of 93.7%.

Conclusion: The OFSOSA, a concise instrument for myofunctional orofacial evaluation, was developed and validated, showing excellent psychometric properties for diagnosing OMDs in OSA patients.

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者口面肌功能障碍的诊断准确性
背景:与健康个体相比,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者已知有口面部肌功能障碍(OMD)。因此,口咽运动治疗在一些OSA病例中显示出希望。然而,这需要充分的口面部肌功能评估。目的:为OSA患者的口面部肌功能评估建立一个简明可靠的量表,包括最相关的项目。扩展口面部肌功能评估评分(oes - e)方案先前已为此目的进行了验证。然而,它因其长度,耗时和遗漏某些项目而受到批评。材料与方法:纳入50例经多导睡眠图诊断为OSA的成人和23例健康成人。在文献的基础上,我们在mes - e量表中加入了额外的项目来加强评估(mes - e Plus),并进行了后续的信度分析。基于信度和相关分析,从mes - e Plus中衍生出较少项目的量表。在年龄和性别匹配的19例OSA患者和19例非OSA患者(对照组)中测定其准确性、敏感性和特异性。统计分析包括Cronbach's alpha、项目-总量相关性和受试者工作特征曲线分析。结果:新编制的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停口腔面部量表(OFSOSA)包括31个项目。OFSOSA具有显著的鉴别能力,曲线下面积为0.987,灵敏度为95.5%,特异性为93.7%。结论:OFSOSA是一种简洁的肌功能口面部评估仪器,在OSA患者的omd诊断中具有良好的心理测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of oral rehabilitation
Journal of oral rehabilitation 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function. Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology. The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信