Comparison of pregnancy outcomes for high morphological scoring mosaic vs. low morphological scoring euploid embryos: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
Tangyi Geng, Qiao Zhou, Ying Wang, Hui Ji, Kai Ding, Zichen Zheng, Ye Yang, Junqiang Zhang, Chun Zhao, Xiufeng Ling
{"title":"Comparison of pregnancy outcomes for high morphological scoring mosaic vs. low morphological scoring euploid embryos: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Tangyi Geng, Qiao Zhou, Ying Wang, Hui Ji, Kai Ding, Zichen Zheng, Ye Yang, Junqiang Zhang, Chun Zhao, Xiufeng Ling","doi":"10.1186/s13048-025-01665-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mosaic embryos have been proven to be capable of resulting in live births and have become an option for embryo transfer under certain circumstances. Recent guidelines suggested that embryo morphological scoring should be taken into consideration when selecting mosaic embryos for transfer. Therefore, we introduce a hypothesis that a high morphological scoring mosaic embryo is a better choice compared to a low morphological scoring euploid embryo.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 1641 embryo transfer cycles following next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Participants were categorized into a mosaic group (87 cycles) and an euploid group (1554 cycles) based on the PGT-A results of the transferred embryos. Statistical methods including multivariate logistic regression analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) were employed to compare the pregnancy outcomes between mosaic and euploid embryo transfer cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the transfer of mosaic embryos was a prognosis for the reducing live birth rate (P = 0.043). Furthermore, when comparing the pregnancy outcomes of the high morphological scoring mosaic embryo transfer group with the low morphological scoring euploid embryo transfer group, no significant differences were observed (P > 0.05). Additionally, no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes were found between both the high morphological score low proportion and segmental mosaic group and the low morphological score euploid group (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicated that morphological scoring has reference value when choosing between euploid and mosaic embryo transfers. Specifically, when the morphological score of euploid embryos is poor, mosaic embryos with high morphological scores could be a viable option after comprehensive prenatal consultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ovarian Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ovarian Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-025-01665-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mosaic embryos have been proven to be capable of resulting in live births and have become an option for embryo transfer under certain circumstances. Recent guidelines suggested that embryo morphological scoring should be taken into consideration when selecting mosaic embryos for transfer. Therefore, we introduce a hypothesis that a high morphological scoring mosaic embryo is a better choice compared to a low morphological scoring euploid embryo.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included 1641 embryo transfer cycles following next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Participants were categorized into a mosaic group (87 cycles) and an euploid group (1554 cycles) based on the PGT-A results of the transferred embryos. Statistical methods including multivariate logistic regression analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) were employed to compare the pregnancy outcomes between mosaic and euploid embryo transfer cycles.

Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the transfer of mosaic embryos was a prognosis for the reducing live birth rate (P = 0.043). Furthermore, when comparing the pregnancy outcomes of the high morphological scoring mosaic embryo transfer group with the low morphological scoring euploid embryo transfer group, no significant differences were observed (P > 0.05). Additionally, no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes were found between both the high morphological score low proportion and segmental mosaic group and the low morphological score euploid group (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Our study indicated that morphological scoring has reference value when choosing between euploid and mosaic embryo transfers. Specifically, when the morphological score of euploid embryos is poor, mosaic embryos with high morphological scores could be a viable option after comprehensive prenatal consultation.

形态学评分高的嵌合体胚胎与形态学评分低的整倍体胚胎妊娠结局的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:马赛克胚胎已被证明能够导致活产,并已成为胚胎移植在某些情况下的一种选择。最近的指南建议在选择用于移植的嵌合胚胎时应考虑胚胎形态学评分。因此,我们提出了一个假说,即形态学评分高的镶嵌胚胎比形态学评分低的整倍体胚胎是更好的选择。材料和方法:本回顾性队列研究包括基于下一代测序(NGS)的胚胎移植前非整倍体(PGT-A)基因检测后的1641个胚胎移植周期。根据移植胚胎的PGT-A结果,将参与者分为镶嵌组(87个周期)和整倍体组(1554个周期)。采用多元logistic回归分析和倾向评分匹配(PSM)等统计方法比较嵌合体和整倍体胚胎移植周期的妊娠结局。结果:多因素logistic回归分析显示,移植嵌合胚胎是降低活产率的预后因素(P = 0.043)。形态学评分高的镶嵌胚胎移植组与形态学评分低的整倍体胚胎移植组的妊娠结局比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。形态学评分高的低比例和片段镶嵌组与形态学评分低的整倍体组妊娠结局无显著差异(P < 0.05)。结论:形态学评分对选择整倍体胚胎移植和镶嵌胚胎移植具有参考价值。具体来说,当整倍体胚胎形态学评分较差时,经过产前全面咨询,形态学评分较高的镶嵌胚胎可能是一种可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ovarian Research
Journal of Ovarian Research REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ovarian Research is an open access, peer reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a forum for high-quality basic and clinical research on ovarian function, abnormalities, and cancer. The journal focuses on research that provides new insights into ovarian functions as well as prevention and treatment of diseases afflicting the organ. Topical areas include, but are not restricted to: Ovary development, hormone secretion and regulation Follicle growth and ovulation Infertility and Polycystic ovarian syndrome Regulation of pituitary and other biological functions by ovarian hormones Ovarian cancer, its prevention, diagnosis and treatment Drug development and screening Role of stem cells in ovary development and function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信