Effectiveness of virtual reality rehabilitation for cervical spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Viprav B Raju, Brian D Schmit, Aditya Vedantam
{"title":"Effectiveness of virtual reality rehabilitation for cervical spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Viprav B Raju, Brian D Schmit, Aditya Vedantam","doi":"10.1177/09544119251337381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) rehabilitation in improving functional performance for patients with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI), which affects both upper and lower limb function. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, electronic databases including PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched. Meta-analysis was conducted on studies reporting common functional outcomes, with standardized mean difference (SMD) used to quantify effect sizes. Nine studies were included in the systematic review, and seven were analyzed in the meta-analysis. Three studies focused on upper limb outcomes, and six on lower limb function. Of the seven studies, four included only CSCI patients, while three had mixed injury cohorts (cervical and thoracic). Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant improvements in function for mixed injury cohorts across various outcomes: Timed-Up and Go test (SMD 0.94 [-0.21, 2.09]), Berg Balance Scale (-0.83 [-1.72, 0.07]), Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (-0.38 [-0.86, 0.09]), Spinal Cord Independence Measure (-0.41 [-0.92, 0.10]), and 10 Meter Walk Test (-1.43 [-3.58, -0.73]). However, the Timed-Up and Go test showed significant results favoring VR-based rehabilitation when excluding mixed cohorts (SMD 2.02 [1.24, 2.79]). VR rehabilitation shows promise for improving lower limb function in CSCI patients, but overall evidence remains inconclusive due to study variability. Standardizing outcome measures and further research on upper limb rehabilitation are essential to enhance the impact of VR-based interventions for CSCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":20666,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"413-422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119251337381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) rehabilitation in improving functional performance for patients with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI), which affects both upper and lower limb function. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, electronic databases including PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched. Meta-analysis was conducted on studies reporting common functional outcomes, with standardized mean difference (SMD) used to quantify effect sizes. Nine studies were included in the systematic review, and seven were analyzed in the meta-analysis. Three studies focused on upper limb outcomes, and six on lower limb function. Of the seven studies, four included only CSCI patients, while three had mixed injury cohorts (cervical and thoracic). Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant improvements in function for mixed injury cohorts across various outcomes: Timed-Up and Go test (SMD 0.94 [-0.21, 2.09]), Berg Balance Scale (-0.83 [-1.72, 0.07]), Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (-0.38 [-0.86, 0.09]), Spinal Cord Independence Measure (-0.41 [-0.92, 0.10]), and 10 Meter Walk Test (-1.43 [-3.58, -0.73]). However, the Timed-Up and Go test showed significant results favoring VR-based rehabilitation when excluding mixed cohorts (SMD 2.02 [1.24, 2.79]). VR rehabilitation shows promise for improving lower limb function in CSCI patients, but overall evidence remains inconclusive due to study variability. Standardizing outcome measures and further research on upper limb rehabilitation are essential to enhance the impact of VR-based interventions for CSCI.

虚拟现实康复治疗颈脊髓损伤的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了虚拟现实(VR)康复在改善影响上肢和下肢功能的颈脊髓损伤(CSCI)患者功能表现方面的有效性。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,检索了PubMed、Medline、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane Library等电子数据库。对报告常见功能结果的研究进行荟萃分析,使用标准化平均差异(SMD)来量化效应大小。9项研究纳入系统评价,7项研究纳入meta分析。三项研究关注上肢结果,六项研究关注下肢功能。在这7项研究中,4项仅包括CSCI患者,而3项有混合损伤队列(颈椎和胸椎)。荟萃分析显示,混合损伤队列在各种结果上的功能改善无统计学意义:timmed - up和Go测试(SMD 0.94 [-0.21, 2.09]), Berg平衡量表(-0.83[-1.72,0.07]),脊髓损伤II步行指数(-0.38[-0.86,0.09]),脊髓独立性测试(-0.41[-0.92,0.10])和10米步行测试(-1.43[-3.58,-0.73])。然而,当排除混合队列时,time - up和Go测试显示明显的结果有利于基于vr的康复(SMD 2.02[1.24, 2.79])。VR康复有望改善CSCI患者的下肢功能,但由于研究的可变性,总体证据仍不确定。标准化结果测量和进一步研究上肢康复对于增强基于vr的干预对CSCI的影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering in Medicine is an interdisciplinary journal encompassing all aspects of engineering in medicine. The Journal is a vital tool for maintaining an understanding of the newest techniques and research in medical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信