{"title":"Acute transcutaneous CO<sub>2</sub> exposure: A feasibility study for the future investigation of CO<sub>2</sub>-specific exercise adaptations.","authors":"Kyle M A Thompson, Avery Bendell, Jamie F Burr","doi":"10.1016/j.jphyss.2025.100021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood flow restricted (BFR) exercise induces musculoskeletal adaptations at reduced exercise loads. The role of hypercapnia during BFR remains unclear, due to difficulties in isolating this factor in vivo. We evaluated a hypercapnic model designed to raise CO<sub>2</sub> levels similar to low-intensity exercise, while minimizing other exercise-induced effects (e.g. hypoxia, lactate accumulation). In a crossover design, 18 participants were administered pure CO₂ (EXP) or room air (CON) transcutaneously from the neck down for 90 min. Ventilatory and blood markers (V̇CO<sub>2</sub>, ETCO<sub>2</sub>, V̇E, pH, and PCO<sub>2</sub>) were measured throughout. The area under the curve of ETCO<sub>2</sub> was higher during EXP compared to CON (75.5 ± 83.7 vs. 32.8 ± 57.5 a.u., p = 0.05), confirming successful CO<sub>2</sub> administration. However, there was no significant effect on PCO<sub>2</sub> (p = 0.09), despite a trend toward reduced pH (p = 0.059). CONCLUSION: While transcutaneous CO<sub>2</sub> absorption induced a physiological response, the magnitude was small, and this model shows limited ecological validity to simulate exercise-like conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiological Sciences","volume":"75 2","pages":"100021"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphyss.2025.100021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Blood flow restricted (BFR) exercise induces musculoskeletal adaptations at reduced exercise loads. The role of hypercapnia during BFR remains unclear, due to difficulties in isolating this factor in vivo. We evaluated a hypercapnic model designed to raise CO2 levels similar to low-intensity exercise, while minimizing other exercise-induced effects (e.g. hypoxia, lactate accumulation). In a crossover design, 18 participants were administered pure CO₂ (EXP) or room air (CON) transcutaneously from the neck down for 90 min. Ventilatory and blood markers (V̇CO2, ETCO2, V̇E, pH, and PCO2) were measured throughout. The area under the curve of ETCO2 was higher during EXP compared to CON (75.5 ± 83.7 vs. 32.8 ± 57.5 a.u., p = 0.05), confirming successful CO2 administration. However, there was no significant effect on PCO2 (p = 0.09), despite a trend toward reduced pH (p = 0.059). CONCLUSION: While transcutaneous CO2 absorption induced a physiological response, the magnitude was small, and this model shows limited ecological validity to simulate exercise-like conditions.
限制血流量(BFR)运动在减少运动负荷时诱导肌肉骨骼适应。高碳酸血症在BFR中的作用尚不清楚,因为很难在体内分离出这一因素。我们评估了一种高碳酸模型,该模型旨在提高二氧化碳水平,类似于低强度运动,同时最大限度地减少其他运动引起的影响(如缺氧、乳酸积累)。在交叉设计中,18名参与者从颈部以下经皮给予纯CO₂(EXP)或室内空气(CON) 90分钟。整个过程中测量通气和血液标志物(V o CO2, ETCO2, V o E, pH和PCO2)。实验组ETCO2曲线下面积高于对照组(75.5±83.7 vs. 32.8±57.5 a.u, p = 0.05),证实CO2给药成功。然而,尽管有降低pH的趋势(p = 0.059),但对PCO2没有显著影响(p = 0.09)。结论:虽然经皮二氧化碳吸收引起了生理反应,但幅度很小,该模型在模拟类似运动的条件下具有有限的生态有效性。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Physiological Sciences publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews, short communications, technical notes, and letters to the editor, based on the principles and theories of modern physiology and addressed to the international scientific community. All fields of physiology are covered, encompassing molecular, cellular and systems physiology. The emphasis is on human and vertebrate physiology, but comparative papers are also considered. The process of obtaining results must be ethically sound.
Fields covered:
Adaptation and environment
Autonomic nervous function
Biophysics
Cell sensors and signaling
Central nervous system and brain sciences
Endocrinology and metabolism
Excitable membranes and neural cell physiology
Exercise physiology
Gastrointestinal and kidney physiology
Heart and circulatory physiology
Molecular and cellular physiology
Muscle physiology
Physiome/systems biology
Respiration physiology
Senses.