Associations Between Total and Regional Fat-to-Muscle Mass Ratio with the Prevalence of Infertility: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-04-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S517307
Huan Dong, Ye Liu, Xianjing Wang, Ping Liu
{"title":"Associations Between Total and Regional Fat-to-Muscle Mass Ratio with the Prevalence of Infertility: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Huan Dong, Ye Liu, Xianjing Wang, Ping Liu","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S517307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The fat-to-muscle mass ratio (FMR) is a novel anthropometric parameter that integrates the antagonistic effects of fat and muscle mass. The current study aimed to examine the associations between total and region-specific FMR with the prevalence of self-reported infertility in US women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>US women aged 20 to 44 years from the 2013-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were included. Total, trunk, arm, and leg FMR were calculated from fat mass and muscle mass in the corresponding body part by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Binary logistic regression, restricted cubic spline analysis and subgroup analysis were primarily used for statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infertility prevalence was 12.77% among the 1958 women included. Arm and leg FMR were not associated with infertility prevalence, while the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for infertility by each 0.1 point increase in trunk and total FMR were 1.19 (1.07-1.33) and 1.16 (1.04-1.30), respectively. Restricted cubic spline analysis indicated a positive and linear relationship between trunk or total FMR and infertility prevalence. Subgroup analysis consistently demonstrated that the associations between trunk or total FMR with infertility prevalence were more pronounced in women without a pregnancy history than in those with a pregnancy history. The receiver-operating characteristic curves indicated that the trunk FMR outperformed total, arm, and leg FMR in discriminating infertility from women without infertility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trunk and total FMR, rather than arm or leg FMR, were associated with an increased risk of infertility in US women, especially those without a prior pregnancy history.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"2173-2184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S517307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The fat-to-muscle mass ratio (FMR) is a novel anthropometric parameter that integrates the antagonistic effects of fat and muscle mass. The current study aimed to examine the associations between total and region-specific FMR with the prevalence of self-reported infertility in US women.

Methods: US women aged 20 to 44 years from the 2013-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were included. Total, trunk, arm, and leg FMR were calculated from fat mass and muscle mass in the corresponding body part by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Binary logistic regression, restricted cubic spline analysis and subgroup analysis were primarily used for statistical analyses.

Results: Infertility prevalence was 12.77% among the 1958 women included. Arm and leg FMR were not associated with infertility prevalence, while the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for infertility by each 0.1 point increase in trunk and total FMR were 1.19 (1.07-1.33) and 1.16 (1.04-1.30), respectively. Restricted cubic spline analysis indicated a positive and linear relationship between trunk or total FMR and infertility prevalence. Subgroup analysis consistently demonstrated that the associations between trunk or total FMR with infertility prevalence were more pronounced in women without a pregnancy history than in those with a pregnancy history. The receiver-operating characteristic curves indicated that the trunk FMR outperformed total, arm, and leg FMR in discriminating infertility from women without infertility.

Conclusion: Trunk and total FMR, rather than arm or leg FMR, were associated with an increased risk of infertility in US women, especially those without a prior pregnancy history.

总和区域脂肪-肌肉质量比与不孕症患病率之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
目的:脂肪与肌肉质量比(FMR)是一种新的人体测量参数,它综合了脂肪和肌肉质量的拮抗作用。目前的研究旨在研究美国女性总体和区域特异性FMR与自我报告的不孕症患病率之间的关系。方法:纳入2013-2018年全国健康与营养检查调查中20至44岁的美国女性。通过双能x线吸收仪从相应身体部位的脂肪量和肌肉量计算总、躯干、手臂和腿部FMR。统计分析主要采用二元逻辑回归、受限三次样条分析和亚组分析。结果:本组1958例妇女不孕率为12.77%。手臂和腿部FMR与不孕症患病率无关,而躯干和总FMR每增加0.1个点,不孕症的优势比和95%置信区间分别为1.19(1.07-1.33)和1.16(1.04-1.30)。限制三次样条分析表明躯干或总FMR与不孕症患病率呈正线性关系。亚组分析一致表明,躯干或总FMR与不孕症患病率之间的关联在没有妊娠史的妇女中比在有妊娠史的妇女中更为明显。接受者操作特征曲线表明躯干FMR在区分不孕和非不孕妇女方面优于全、臂和腿FMR。结论:躯干和整体FMR,而不是手臂或腿部FMR,与美国女性不孕风险增加有关,尤其是那些没有妊娠史的女性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信