Efficacy of modified pancreatic duct stent drainage during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Li-Jia Qian, Chen Xu, Jian-Rong Wang, Jun Quan
{"title":"Efficacy of modified pancreatic duct stent drainage during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.","authors":"Li-Jia Qian, Chen Xu, Jian-Rong Wang, Jun Quan","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.101295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Common bile duct stones pose a high risk of recurrence or disease progression if not promptly treated. However, there is still no optimal treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the clinical efficacy of modified pancreatic duct stent drainage in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for treating common bile duct stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 175 patients with common bile duct stones treated at Taizhou Fourth People's Hospital between January 1, 2021, and November 30, 2023. The patients were divided into three groups-the modified pancreatic duct stent drainage group (59 cases), the nasobiliary drainage group (58 cases), and the standard biliary drainage group (58 cases). Preoperative general clinical data, laboratory indicators, and the visual analog scale (VAS) at two time points (24 hours before and after surgery) were compared, along with postoperative complications across the three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, C-reactive protein, and amylase were significantly lower in the modified pancreatic duct stent drainage group and the standard biliary drainage group than those in the nasobiliary drainage group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in white blood cells, hemoglobin, or neutrophil levels among the three groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The standard biliary drainage group had significantly lower VAS scores [(4.36 ± 1.18) points] than those for the modified pancreatic duct stent drainage group [(4.92 ± 1.68) points] (<i>P</i> = 0.033), and the nasobiliary drainage group [(5.54 ± 1.24) points] (<i>P</i> = 0.017). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates across the three groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to standard biliary drainage and nasobiliary drainage, the modified pancreatic duct stent used during ERCP for patients with bile duct stones significantly reduced hepatocyte injury, improved liver function parameters, alleviated inflammation and pain, enhanced patient comfort, and demonstrated superior safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 4","pages":"101295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.101295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Common bile duct stones pose a high risk of recurrence or disease progression if not promptly treated. However, there is still no optimal treatment approach.

Aim: To investigate the clinical efficacy of modified pancreatic duct stent drainage in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for treating common bile duct stones.

Methods: This retrospective study included 175 patients with common bile duct stones treated at Taizhou Fourth People's Hospital between January 1, 2021, and November 30, 2023. The patients were divided into three groups-the modified pancreatic duct stent drainage group (59 cases), the nasobiliary drainage group (58 cases), and the standard biliary drainage group (58 cases). Preoperative general clinical data, laboratory indicators, and the visual analog scale (VAS) at two time points (24 hours before and after surgery) were compared, along with postoperative complications across the three groups.

Results: Serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, C-reactive protein, and amylase were significantly lower in the modified pancreatic duct stent drainage group and the standard biliary drainage group than those in the nasobiliary drainage group (P < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in white blood cells, hemoglobin, or neutrophil levels among the three groups (P > 0.05). The standard biliary drainage group had significantly lower VAS scores [(4.36 ± 1.18) points] than those for the modified pancreatic duct stent drainage group [(4.92 ± 1.68) points] (P = 0.033), and the nasobiliary drainage group [(5.54 ± 1.24) points] (P = 0.017). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates across the three groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Compared to standard biliary drainage and nasobiliary drainage, the modified pancreatic duct stent used during ERCP for patients with bile duct stones significantly reduced hepatocyte injury, improved liver function parameters, alleviated inflammation and pain, enhanced patient comfort, and demonstrated superior safety.

内镜逆行胆管造影中改良胰管支架引流治疗胆总管结石的疗效。
背景:胆总管结石如果不及时治疗,复发或疾病进展的风险很高。然而,目前仍没有最佳的治疗方法。目的:探讨内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)中改良胰管支架引流治疗胆总管结石的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月1日至2023年11月30日在泰州市第四人民医院治疗的175例胆总管结石患者。将患者分为改良胰管支架引流组(59例)、鼻胆道引流组(58例)和标准胆道引流组(58例)。比较三组患者术前一般临床资料、实验室指标、术前、术后两个时间点视觉模拟评分(VAS)及术后并发症情况。结果:改良胰管支架引流组和标准胆道引流组血清天冬氨酸转氨酶、丙氨酸转氨酶、碱性磷酸酶、γ -谷氨酰转移酶、总胆红素、直接胆红素、c反应蛋白、淀粉酶水平均显著低于鼻胆道引流组(P < 0.05)。三组患者白细胞、血红蛋白、中性粒细胞水平差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。标准胆道引流组VAS评分[(4.36±1.18)分]明显低于改良胰管支架引流组[(4.92±1.68)分](P = 0.033)和鼻胆道引流组[(5.54±1.24)分](P = 0.017)。三组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:与标准胆道引流和鼻胆道引流相比,改良胰管支架在胆管结石患者ERCP中应用可显著减轻肝细胞损伤,改善肝功能参数,减轻炎症和疼痛,增强患者舒适度,安全性更佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信