Is the handgrip pressure influenced by the same factors in typical children and adolescents and those with spina bifida?

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Emanuela Juvenal Martins, Camila Scarpino Barboza Franco, Ana Claudia Mattiello-Sverzut
{"title":"Is the handgrip pressure influenced by the same factors in typical children and adolescents and those with spina bifida?","authors":"Emanuela Juvenal Martins, Camila Scarpino Barboza Franco, Ana Claudia Mattiello-Sverzut","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2488572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the factors influencing handgrip pressure (HGP) in typical children and adolescents and those with spina bifida (SB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study enrolled 126 typical participants and 58 with SB, aged 8-16 years, categorized into subgroups: typical children (typical prepubertal; <i>n</i> = 20), typical adolescents (typical pubertal and post-pubertal; <i>n</i> = 106), SB children (SB prepubertal; <i>n</i> = 11), and SB adolescents (SB pubertal and post-pubertal; <i>n</i> = 47). Data on sex, height (or wingspan), lean and fat body mass, and levels of physical activity and spinal cord injury were collected. Participants performed three maximal voluntary isometric contractions of HGP using a bulb dynamometer. Multiple linear regression analyses examined the relationship between variables and HGP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In typical children, decreases in height, fat and lean body mass were associated with decreased HGP. In typical adolescents, females exhibited higher HGP than males, and increases in lean body mass and height were positively associated with HGP; and sedentary individuals exhibited higher HGP compared to active counterparts. In SB adolescents, increases in fat and lean body mass were associated with higher HGP, and greater physical activity was associated with stronger HGP. Participants with sacral injury level showed higher HGP than those with thoracic injury level. No association was observed for SB children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Except for SB children, various factors, mainly the lean body mass, significantly influenced the HGP in all groups. When the outcome is HGP, it is important to monitor body composition and physical activity in typical children and adolescents and those with SB.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2488572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the factors influencing handgrip pressure (HGP) in typical children and adolescents and those with spina bifida (SB).

Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 126 typical participants and 58 with SB, aged 8-16 years, categorized into subgroups: typical children (typical prepubertal; n = 20), typical adolescents (typical pubertal and post-pubertal; n = 106), SB children (SB prepubertal; n = 11), and SB adolescents (SB pubertal and post-pubertal; n = 47). Data on sex, height (or wingspan), lean and fat body mass, and levels of physical activity and spinal cord injury were collected. Participants performed three maximal voluntary isometric contractions of HGP using a bulb dynamometer. Multiple linear regression analyses examined the relationship between variables and HGP.

Results: In typical children, decreases in height, fat and lean body mass were associated with decreased HGP. In typical adolescents, females exhibited higher HGP than males, and increases in lean body mass and height were positively associated with HGP; and sedentary individuals exhibited higher HGP compared to active counterparts. In SB adolescents, increases in fat and lean body mass were associated with higher HGP, and greater physical activity was associated with stronger HGP. Participants with sacral injury level showed higher HGP than those with thoracic injury level. No association was observed for SB children.

Conclusion: Except for SB children, various factors, mainly the lean body mass, significantly influenced the HGP in all groups. When the outcome is HGP, it is important to monitor body composition and physical activity in typical children and adolescents and those with SB.

典型儿童和青少年与脊柱裂患者的握力是否受到相同因素的影响?
目的:探讨影响典型儿童、青少年和脊柱裂(SB)患者握力(HGP)的因素。方法:本横断面研究招募了126名典型参与者和58名8-16岁的SB,分为典型儿童(典型青春期前;N = 20),典型青少年(典型青春期和青春期后;n = 106), SB儿童(SB青春期前;n = 11)和SB青少年(SB发育期和青春期后;n = 47)。收集了性别、身高(或翼展)、瘦体重和胖体重、身体活动水平和脊髓损伤的数据。参与者使用球茎测力仪进行了三次最大自愿等距收缩。多元线性回归分析检验了变量与HGP之间的关系。结果:在典型儿童中,身高、脂肪和瘦体重的降低与HGP的降低有关。在典型青少年中,女性的HGP高于男性,瘦体重和身高的增加与HGP呈正相关;久坐不动的人比活跃的人表现出更高的HGP。在SB青少年中,脂肪和瘦体重的增加与较高的HGP相关,而更多的体育活动与较强的HGP相关。骶部损伤水平的受试者HGP高于胸部损伤水平的受试者。在SB儿童中未观察到相关。结论:除SB儿童外,各因素均显著影响各组HGP,以瘦体质量为主。当结果是HGP时,监测典型儿童和青少年以及SB患者的身体成分和身体活动是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信