The Curious Concept That Almost Nobody Seemed to Care About at First: Virtual Particles in the Post-War Period.

IF 0.6 2区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Jean-Philippe Martinez
{"title":"The Curious Concept That Almost Nobody Seemed to Care About at First: Virtual Particles in the Post-War Period.","authors":"Jean-Philippe Martinez","doi":"10.1002/bewi.202400023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Short-lived, unobservable, and not subject to the usual rules of conservation of energy and momentum, virtual particles-an integral part of the conceptual framework of quantum field theory (QFT)-exhibit a number of curious characteristics which, in recent decades, have in part fueled important discussions about their ontological status. Central to these debates is Richard Feynman's diagrammatic technique for QFT calculations, which provided in the late 1940s the first systematized and generalized description of the concept of virtual particles. At the time, however, the curious characteristics and the ontology of the latter were the subject of little, if any, debate. This article explores how the concept of virtual particles gradually became subject to interpretative scrutiny in the post-war period. It examines the weight of various aspects of pre-Feynman developments which once guaranteed a firmer phenomenological anchoring of the scientific practices associated with the virtual particle concept. Subsequently, it shows how the questioning of this concept did not result from a simple assessment of its curious characteristics but was part of a wider critique of the new quantum electrodynamics and Feynman's methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":55388,"journal":{"name":"Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bewi.202400023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Short-lived, unobservable, and not subject to the usual rules of conservation of energy and momentum, virtual particles-an integral part of the conceptual framework of quantum field theory (QFT)-exhibit a number of curious characteristics which, in recent decades, have in part fueled important discussions about their ontological status. Central to these debates is Richard Feynman's diagrammatic technique for QFT calculations, which provided in the late 1940s the first systematized and generalized description of the concept of virtual particles. At the time, however, the curious characteristics and the ontology of the latter were the subject of little, if any, debate. This article explores how the concept of virtual particles gradually became subject to interpretative scrutiny in the post-war period. It examines the weight of various aspects of pre-Feynman developments which once guaranteed a firmer phenomenological anchoring of the scientific practices associated with the virtual particle concept. Subsequently, it shows how the questioning of this concept did not result from a simple assessment of its curious characteristics but was part of a wider critique of the new quantum electrodynamics and Feynman's methods.

一开始几乎没有人关心的奇怪概念:战后时期的虚拟粒子。
虚粒子是量子场论(QFT)概念框架的一个组成部分,它们寿命短、不可观察、不受能量和动量守恒的通常规则的约束,它们表现出许多奇怪的特征,这些特征在最近几十年里在一定程度上推动了关于它们的本体论地位的重要讨论。这些争论的核心是理查德·费曼(Richard Feynman)的QFT计算图解技术,该技术在20世纪40年代末首次系统化和一般化地描述了虚粒子的概念。然而,在当时,后者的奇特特征和本体论几乎没有争论,如果有的话。本文探讨了虚粒子的概念在战后如何逐渐成为解释性审查的对象。它考察了前费曼发展的各个方面的重要性,这些发展曾经保证了与虚粒子概念相关的科学实践的更牢固的现象学锚定。随后,它展示了对这一概念的质疑如何不是源于对其奇怪特征的简单评估,而是对新量子电动力学和费曼方法的更广泛批评的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Geschichte der Wissenschaften ist in erster Linie eine Geschichte der Ideen und Entdeckungen, oft genug aber auch der Moden, Irrtümer und Missverständnisse. Sie hängt eng mit der Entwicklung kultureller und zivilisatorischer Leistungen zusammen und bleibt von der politischen Geschichte keineswegs unberührt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信