Rasch analysis of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder in a large inpatient sample

IF 3 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Emily M. Britton, Radia Taisir, Shannon Remers, Yelena Chorny, Marie Gendy, Mary Jean Costello, Brian Rush, James MacKillop
{"title":"Rasch analysis of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder in a large inpatient sample","authors":"Emily M. Britton,&nbsp;Radia Taisir,&nbsp;Shannon Remers,&nbsp;Yelena Chorny,&nbsp;Marie Gendy,&nbsp;Mary Jean Costello,&nbsp;Brian Rush,&nbsp;James MacKillop","doi":"10.1111/acer.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In the present study, we extend previous psychometric evaluations of the DSM-5 alcohol use disorder (AUD) criteria using Rasch analysis in a large clinical sample.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Adult patients with AUD (<i>N</i> = 1101) completed the DSM-5 AUD symptom checklist as part of routine clinical assessment upon admission to an inpatient substance use disorder treatment program. We conducted Rasch analysis of responses to the 11 criteria, examining model fit and item severities. We also examined whether there was evidence of differential item functioning based on sex and age.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Results supported the unidimensionality and local independence of the criteria, although some items were a suboptimal fit to the Rasch model. In particular, across all indicators, hazardous use exhibited misfit with model expectations. Additionally, the range of item severities did not span the full range of problem severity within this clinical sample, with many patients at the high end of the severity continuum and no items to differentiate them. There was evidence of differential item functioning by both sex and age, but effect size indices suggested that differences were unlikely to be clinically meaningful.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The present study supports the unidimensionality of the DSM-5 AUD diagnosis, but the misfit of certain items to the Rasch model and the narrow range of item severities suggest that more granular distinctions in AUD may be limited in high-severity samples. The results also suggest that the assumptions of interval-level measurement may not hold in clinical populations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"49 5","pages":"1076-1085"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.70029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.70029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In the present study, we extend previous psychometric evaluations of the DSM-5 alcohol use disorder (AUD) criteria using Rasch analysis in a large clinical sample.

Methods

Adult patients with AUD (N = 1101) completed the DSM-5 AUD symptom checklist as part of routine clinical assessment upon admission to an inpatient substance use disorder treatment program. We conducted Rasch analysis of responses to the 11 criteria, examining model fit and item severities. We also examined whether there was evidence of differential item functioning based on sex and age.

Results

Results supported the unidimensionality and local independence of the criteria, although some items were a suboptimal fit to the Rasch model. In particular, across all indicators, hazardous use exhibited misfit with model expectations. Additionally, the range of item severities did not span the full range of problem severity within this clinical sample, with many patients at the high end of the severity continuum and no items to differentiate them. There was evidence of differential item functioning by both sex and age, but effect size indices suggested that differences were unlikely to be clinically meaningful.

Conclusions

The present study supports the unidimensionality of the DSM-5 AUD diagnosis, but the misfit of certain items to the Rasch model and the narrow range of item severities suggest that more granular distinctions in AUD may be limited in high-severity samples. The results also suggest that the assumptions of interval-level measurement may not hold in clinical populations.

大量住院患者样本中DSM-5酒精使用障碍的皮疹分析
背景:在本研究中,我们在一个大型临床样本中使用Rasch分析扩展了DSM-5酒精使用障碍(AUD)标准的先前心理测量评估。方法:成年AUD患者(N = 1101)在进入住院药物使用障碍治疗项目时,完成DSM-5 AUD症状检查表,作为常规临床评估的一部分。我们对11项标准的反应进行了Rasch分析,检查了模型拟合和项目严重程度。我们还研究了是否存在基于性别和年龄的不同项目功能的证据。结果:结果支持标准的单维性和局部独立性,尽管有些项目不适合Rasch模型。特别是,在所有指标中,危险使用与模型预期不符。此外,在临床样本中,项目严重程度的范围并没有跨越问题严重程度的全部范围,许多患者处于严重程度连续体的高端,没有项目来区分他们。有证据表明,不同性别和年龄的项目功能存在差异,但效应大小指数表明,差异不太可能具有临床意义。结论:本研究支持DSM-5 AUD诊断的单维性,但某些项目与Rasch模型的不匹配以及项目严重程度的狭窄范围表明,在高严重程度的样本中,AUD的更细粒度区分可能受到限制。结果还表明,区间水平测量的假设在临床人群中可能不成立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信