Barriers and sources of information in prostate cancer screening at a South African hospital.

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health in Africa Pub Date : 2025-04-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jphia.v16i1.666
Boitumelo M Komane, Annah Mosalo
{"title":"Barriers and sources of information in prostate cancer screening at a South African hospital.","authors":"Boitumelo M Komane, Annah Mosalo","doi":"10.4102/jphia.v16i1.666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prostate cancer is a worldwide problem affecting men globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. However, research pertaining to barriers to screening uptake and sources of information regarding prostate cancer is limited in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The objective of the study was to explore barriers to screening and sources of information among men attending urologic clinic at a specific tertiary hospital in Gauteng.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Urology clinic at a specific tertiary hospital in Gauteng.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative, exploratory study was conducted with 19 conveniently selected men attending the specific clinic. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes emerged which were (1) barriers to screening, (2) sources of information regarding prostate cancer and (3) symptoms experienced during screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provided evidence regarding the lack of privacy, pain control, fear of the procedure and embarrassment as being barriers towards screening. Failure of healthcare practitioners to recommend screening when in contact with patients eligible for screening also contributed as a barrier. Media and pamphlets played a role as sources of information regarding awareness pertaining to the disease.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The study findings have a potential to help healthcare practitioners to be proactive and recommend screening for men who are eligible or might be at risk. The findings will also help healthcare practitioners to be sensitive and exercise caution in maintaining privacy during screening, and that men are informed regarding what screening procedures entail to gain their cooperation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","volume":"16 1","pages":"666"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i1.666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer is a worldwide problem affecting men globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. However, research pertaining to barriers to screening uptake and sources of information regarding prostate cancer is limited in South Africa.

Aim: The objective of the study was to explore barriers to screening and sources of information among men attending urologic clinic at a specific tertiary hospital in Gauteng.

Setting: Urology clinic at a specific tertiary hospital in Gauteng.

Methods: A qualitative, exploratory study was conducted with 19 conveniently selected men attending the specific clinic. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Three themes emerged which were (1) barriers to screening, (2) sources of information regarding prostate cancer and (3) symptoms experienced during screening.

Conclusion: The study provided evidence regarding the lack of privacy, pain control, fear of the procedure and embarrassment as being barriers towards screening. Failure of healthcare practitioners to recommend screening when in contact with patients eligible for screening also contributed as a barrier. Media and pamphlets played a role as sources of information regarding awareness pertaining to the disease.

Contribution: The study findings have a potential to help healthcare practitioners to be proactive and recommend screening for men who are eligible or might be at risk. The findings will also help healthcare practitioners to be sensitive and exercise caution in maintaining privacy during screening, and that men are informed regarding what screening procedures entail to gain their cooperation.

南非一家医院前列腺癌筛查的障碍和信息来源。
背景:前列腺癌是影响全球男性的世界性问题,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。然而,在南非,关于前列腺癌筛查的障碍和信息来源的研究是有限的。目的:本研究的目的是探讨在豪登省某三级医院泌尿科门诊就诊的男性进行筛查的障碍和信息来源。环境:豪登省某三级医院的泌尿科诊所。方法:采用定性、探索性的研究方法,选取19名在特定诊所就诊的男性。采用专题分析对数据进行分析。结果:出现了三个主题,即(1)筛查的障碍,(2)关于前列腺癌的信息来源,(3)筛查期间经历的症状。结论:该研究提供的证据表明,缺乏隐私、疼痛控制、对手术的恐惧和尴尬是筛查的障碍。当与有资格进行筛查的患者接触时,医疗保健从业人员推荐筛查的失败也造成了障碍。媒体和小册子发挥了宣传这种疾病的作用。贡献:研究结果有可能帮助医疗保健从业者积极主动,并建议对符合条件或可能有风险的男性进行筛查。研究结果还将帮助医疗保健从业人员在筛查过程中保持敏感和谨慎,并告知男性需要哪些筛查程序才能获得他们的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health in Africa
Journal of Public Health in Africa PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health in Africa (JPHiA) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal that focuses on health issues in the African continent. The journal editors seek high quality original articles on public health related issues, reviews, comments and more. The aim of the journal is to move public health discourse from the background to the forefront. The success of Africa’s struggle against disease depends on public health approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信