Sustained Impact of Task-shifting HCV Treatment to Nonspecialist Providers: 5-Year Follow Up of the ASCEND Investigation.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-03-22 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf174
Sarah Mollenkopf, Elana Rosenthal, Geb Teferi, Rachel Silk, Nivya George, Henry Masur, Shyam Kottilil, Sarah Kattakuzhy
{"title":"Sustained Impact of Task-shifting HCV Treatment to Nonspecialist Providers: 5-Year Follow Up of the ASCEND Investigation.","authors":"Sarah Mollenkopf, Elana Rosenthal, Geb Teferi, Rachel Silk, Nivya George, Henry Masur, Shyam Kottilil, Sarah Kattakuzhy","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has ushered in an era of short-duration treatment with high effectiveness across varied patient populations. In the ASCEND investigation, treatment with DAA was efficacious when delivered by nonspecialist and specialist providers. However, long-term outcomes after initial treatment are unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the long-term outcomes after DAA treatment independently provided by nurse practitioners, primary care physicians, or specialist physicians using DAA therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twelve urban, federally qualified health centers in the District of Columbia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 551 patients treated for HCV in the ASCEND investigation (A Phase IV Pilot Study to Assess of Community-based Treatment Efficacy in Chronic Hepatitis C Monoinfection and Coinfection with HIV in the District of Columbia).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Sustained viral response (SVR12), reinfection, retreatment, death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this large sample of majority Black individuals receiving care at community-based centers, there was an initial 87% rate of SVR, and after 5 years of follow up, an additional 6.5% of participants were found to be cured. This included individuals originally lost to follow up whose subsequent testing confirmed SVR12, and those with successful retreatment after initial treatment failure. There was a 70% rate of testing for reinfection, with 2 identified reinfections. Treatment outcomes were not associated with original treating provider type.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>As a retrospective analysis, these findings are limited by the availability of data in the electronic medical record.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DAA is an effective treatment for HCV and can safely be prescribed by multiple provider types, with favorable long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 4","pages":"ofaf174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12006796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has ushered in an era of short-duration treatment with high effectiveness across varied patient populations. In the ASCEND investigation, treatment with DAA was efficacious when delivered by nonspecialist and specialist providers. However, long-term outcomes after initial treatment are unknown.

Objective: To determine the long-term outcomes after DAA treatment independently provided by nurse practitioners, primary care physicians, or specialist physicians using DAA therapy.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Twelve urban, federally qualified health centers in the District of Columbia.

Participants: A total of 551 patients treated for HCV in the ASCEND investigation (A Phase IV Pilot Study to Assess of Community-based Treatment Efficacy in Chronic Hepatitis C Monoinfection and Coinfection with HIV in the District of Columbia).

Interventions: None.

Measurements: Sustained viral response (SVR12), reinfection, retreatment, death.

Results: In this large sample of majority Black individuals receiving care at community-based centers, there was an initial 87% rate of SVR, and after 5 years of follow up, an additional 6.5% of participants were found to be cured. This included individuals originally lost to follow up whose subsequent testing confirmed SVR12, and those with successful retreatment after initial treatment failure. There was a 70% rate of testing for reinfection, with 2 identified reinfections. Treatment outcomes were not associated with original treating provider type.

Limitations: As a retrospective analysis, these findings are limited by the availability of data in the electronic medical record.

Conclusions: DAA is an effective treatment for HCV and can safely be prescribed by multiple provider types, with favorable long-term outcomes.

任务转移HCV治疗对非专业提供者的持续影响:ASCEND调查的5年随访
背景:丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的直接抗病毒(DAA)治疗已经开启了一个在不同患者群体中短时间高效治疗的时代。在ASCEND研究中,无论是由非专业医生还是专业医生提供DAA治疗都是有效的。然而,初始治疗后的长期结果尚不清楚。目的:确定由执业护士、初级保健医生或专科医生独立提供DAA治疗后的长期疗效。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:哥伦比亚特区的12个城市,联邦合格的医疗中心。参与者:在ASCEND调查中,共有551名HCV患者接受治疗(哥伦比亚特区慢性丙型肝炎单感染和合并感染HIV的社区治疗效果评估的IV期试点研究)。干预措施:没有。测量:持续病毒应答(SVR12)、再感染、再治疗、死亡。结果:在这个在社区中心接受治疗的大多数黑人个体的大样本中,最初的SVR率为87%,经过5年的随访,又有6.5%的参与者被发现治愈。这包括最初失去随访的个体,其随后的检测证实了SVR12,以及在初始治疗失败后成功重新治疗的个体。再感染检出率为70%,确诊再感染2例。治疗结果与原始治疗提供者类型无关。局限性:作为一项回顾性分析,这些发现受到电子病历数据可用性的限制。结论:DAA是一种有效的HCV治疗方法,可以安全地由多种提供者类型开出,具有良好的长期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信