Computed tomography differentiation of compact and cancellous bone tissue in short and sesamoid bones.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Radiology and Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-11 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.2478/raon-2025-0022
Ziva Miriam Gersak, Irena Zupanic-Pajnic, Eva Podovsovnik, Vladka Salapura
{"title":"Computed tomography differentiation of compact and cancellous bone tissue in short and sesamoid bones.","authors":"Ziva Miriam Gersak, Irena Zupanic-Pajnic, Eva Podovsovnik, Vladka Salapura","doi":"10.2478/raon-2025-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selecting the most suitable skeletal remains for genetic analysis is challenging due to the variable DNA yield across different bone types and within individual bones. Compact bone typically preserves DNA longer, whereas cancellous bones, such as those in the hands and feet, often contain higher DNA quantities. This study aimed to incorporate dual-source computed tomography (DSCT), a technique frequently utilized for assessing bone density in living subjects, into targeted DNA sampling for dry, skeletonized remains by mapping compact and cancellous regions within six small skeletal elements.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 137 bones were analysed using an imaging protocol specifically adapted to highlight the skeletal structure of small bones. This tailored protocol involved meticulous calibration of imaging parameters. Anatomical landmarks for six distinct elements were identified, and regions of interest were selected for bone density measurement in Hounsfield units (HU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 461 assessed regions, 312 (68%) were classified as compact bone, and 149 (32%) as cancellous bone. Given the abnormal distribution of data, statistical differences were evaluated using 95% confidence intervals, with significance indicated by non-overlapping intervals. The analysis revealed statistically significant differences between compact and cancellous bone, as well as within each type across different bones.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DSCT proved effective in mapping the internal structure of six small skeletal elements in dry, skeletonized remains, underscoring significant intra-bone variability in density. The findings illustrate DSCT's substantial potential for enhancing DNA sampling in forensic and paleogenetic studies, setting the stage for future research advancements.</p>","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"311-318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2025-0022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Selecting the most suitable skeletal remains for genetic analysis is challenging due to the variable DNA yield across different bone types and within individual bones. Compact bone typically preserves DNA longer, whereas cancellous bones, such as those in the hands and feet, often contain higher DNA quantities. This study aimed to incorporate dual-source computed tomography (DSCT), a technique frequently utilized for assessing bone density in living subjects, into targeted DNA sampling for dry, skeletonized remains by mapping compact and cancellous regions within six small skeletal elements.

Materials and methods: A total of 137 bones were analysed using an imaging protocol specifically adapted to highlight the skeletal structure of small bones. This tailored protocol involved meticulous calibration of imaging parameters. Anatomical landmarks for six distinct elements were identified, and regions of interest were selected for bone density measurement in Hounsfield units (HU).

Results: Among 461 assessed regions, 312 (68%) were classified as compact bone, and 149 (32%) as cancellous bone. Given the abnormal distribution of data, statistical differences were evaluated using 95% confidence intervals, with significance indicated by non-overlapping intervals. The analysis revealed statistically significant differences between compact and cancellous bone, as well as within each type across different bones.

Conclusions: DSCT proved effective in mapping the internal structure of six small skeletal elements in dry, skeletonized remains, underscoring significant intra-bone variability in density. The findings illustrate DSCT's substantial potential for enhancing DNA sampling in forensic and paleogenetic studies, setting the stage for future research advancements.

短骨和籽状骨中致密和松质骨组织的计算机断层鉴别。
背景:选择最合适的骨骼遗骸进行遗传分析是具有挑战性的,因为不同骨骼类型和单个骨骼内的DNA产量是可变的。致密骨通常保存DNA的时间更长,而松质骨,比如手和脚,通常含有更多的DNA。本研究旨在结合双源计算机断层扫描(DSCT),这是一种经常用于评估活体骨密度的技术,通过在六个小骨骼元素内绘制紧凑和松质区域,将其纳入干燥骨骼化遗骸的靶向DNA采样中。材料和方法:使用一种专门用于突出小骨的骨骼结构的成像方案,共分析了137块骨头。这种量身定制的方案涉及对成像参数的细致校准。确定了六个不同元素的解剖标志,并选择感兴趣的区域进行Hounsfield单位(HU)的骨密度测量。结果:在461个评估区域中,312个(68%)为致密骨,149个(32%)为松质骨。考虑到数据的异常分布,统计差异采用95%置信区间进行评估,以不重叠的区间表示显著性。分析显示,在致密骨和松质骨之间,以及每种类型的不同骨骼之间,存在统计学上的显著差异。结论:DSCT被证明可以有效地绘制干骨化遗骸中六个小骨骼元素的内部结构,强调了骨内密度的显著变异性。这些发现说明了DSCT在法医和古遗传学研究中增强DNA采样的巨大潜力,为未来的研究进步奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiology and Oncology
Radiology and Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信