A comprehensive evaluation of the transition to a biosimilar of adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis: a single-center experience with a focus on imaging outcomes.

IF 1.2 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rodrigo Garcia-Salinas, Sebastian Magri, Alvaro Ruta, Santiago Ruta
{"title":"A comprehensive evaluation of the transition to a biosimilar of adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis: a single-center experience with a focus on imaging outcomes.","authors":"Rodrigo Garcia-Salinas, Sebastian Magri, Alvaro Ruta, Santiago Ruta","doi":"10.4081/reumatismo.2025.1748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited data in Latin America exists regarding the efficacy of switches from original biologicals to biosimilars in real-life scenarios. Currently, no studies assess this switch using imaging. The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical, functional, ultrasonographic, and radiological responses in a group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) switched from original adalimumab (oADA) to biosimilar (bADA) (GP2017).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study included diagnosed RA and PsA patients undergoing oADA treatment. At the baseline visit, blood analysis, X-rays, ultrasound, and an interview for sociodemographic and clinical data were conducted. Evaluators were unaware of each other's data. Patients switched to bADA during follow-up and were assessed in the same program within 3 to 12 months post-switch (only including patients with all evaluations).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 270 RA cohort patients, 35 met the criteria for complete pre-and-post control post-switch to bADA (GP2017), along with 15 PsA patients. The mean time between the switch and the second evaluation was 4.1 months (interquartile range 7). No statistical differences were observed in disease activity or functional capacity. Regarding imaging, no difference was found in X-ray erosion number; however, ultrasonography revealed decreased power Doppler (PD) activity, but not grayscale findings. No differences in acute phase reactants, joint count, or patient visual analog scale were observed between controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this analysis of the switch between oADA and bADA, no differences were found in disease activity, functional capacity, or radiographic progression. Ultrasonography indicated improvement of PD findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21222,"journal":{"name":"Reumatismo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatismo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2025.1748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Limited data in Latin America exists regarding the efficacy of switches from original biologicals to biosimilars in real-life scenarios. Currently, no studies assess this switch using imaging. The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical, functional, ultrasonographic, and radiological responses in a group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) switched from original adalimumab (oADA) to biosimilar (bADA) (GP2017).

Methods: A prospective cohort study included diagnosed RA and PsA patients undergoing oADA treatment. At the baseline visit, blood analysis, X-rays, ultrasound, and an interview for sociodemographic and clinical data were conducted. Evaluators were unaware of each other's data. Patients switched to bADA during follow-up and were assessed in the same program within 3 to 12 months post-switch (only including patients with all evaluations).

Results: Out of 270 RA cohort patients, 35 met the criteria for complete pre-and-post control post-switch to bADA (GP2017), along with 15 PsA patients. The mean time between the switch and the second evaluation was 4.1 months (interquartile range 7). No statistical differences were observed in disease activity or functional capacity. Regarding imaging, no difference was found in X-ray erosion number; however, ultrasonography revealed decreased power Doppler (PD) activity, but not grayscale findings. No differences in acute phase reactants, joint count, or patient visual analog scale were observed between controls.

Conclusions: In this analysis of the switch between oADA and bADA, no differences were found in disease activity, functional capacity, or radiographic progression. Ultrasonography indicated improvement of PD findings.

阿达木单抗在类风湿关节炎和银屑病关节炎中向生物仿制药过渡的综合评估:一项专注于影像学结果的单中心经验。
目的:拉丁美洲关于在现实生活中从原始生物制剂转向生物仿制药的有效性的数据有限。目前,还没有研究使用成像来评估这种转换。本研究的目的是评估一组类风湿关节炎(RA)和银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者从原始阿达木单抗(oADA)切换到生物类似药(bADA) (GP2017)的临床、功能、超声和放射学反应。方法:一项前瞻性队列研究包括接受oADA治疗的确诊RA和PsA患者。在基线访问时,进行了血液分析、x光、超声波和社会人口统计学和临床数据访谈。评估人员不知道彼此的数据。患者在随访期间切换到bADA,并在切换后的3至12个月内在同一计划中进行评估(仅包括所有评估的患者)。结果:在270名RA队列患者中,35名患者在切换到bADA (GP2017)后符合完全前后对照标准,以及15名PsA患者。转换和第二次评估之间的平均时间为4.1个月(四分位数间距7)。在疾病活动性和功能能力方面没有观察到统计学差异。影像学方面,x射线侵蚀数无差异;然而,超声检查显示功率多普勒(PD)活性降低,但未见灰度图。在对照组之间,急性期反应物、关节计数或患者视觉模拟量表均无差异。结论:在oADA和bADA之间转换的分析中,没有发现疾病活动性、功能能力或影像学进展方面的差异。超声检查显示PD表现改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reumatismo
Reumatismo RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
20
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Reumatismo is the official Journal of the Italian Society of Rheumatology (SIR). It publishes Abstracts and Proceedings of Italian Congresses and original papers concerning rheumatology. Reumatismo is published quarterly and is sent free of charge to the Members of the SIR who regularly pay the annual fee. Those who are not Members of the SIR as well as Corporations and Institutions may also subscribe to the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信