{"title":"Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Chinese Breast Cancer Patients Towards Comprehensive Postoperative Self-Management: a Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Xiaoyu Wei, Ping Ye, Lingling Chen, Huiqin Tang, Weiwei Yin, Min Shao, Ru Bai, Yun Li, Jiya Yu, Wei Wang, Jing Zhang","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S506429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To comprehensively assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of Chinese breast cancer (BC) patients regarding postoperative self-management (POSM) and identify factors influencing self-management behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questionnaire surveys were administered to BC patients who underwent surgery. A total of 566 participants (98.94% female), mainly from rural areas (65.55%) and married (97.53%), were included. Knowledge was measured using 10 questions (score range: 0-20), attitude with 6 questions (score range: 6-30), and practice with 7 questions (score range: 6-30). Scores were categorized as inadequate (0%-39.99%), moderate (40%-70%), or satisfactory (>70% of maximum score). Demographic data were collected, and statistical analyses, including T-tests, ANOVA, non-parametric tests, and Spearman correlation, were used for comparisons and associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average knowledge score was 20.00 (100% of the maximum score), with correct answer rates ranging from 92.58% to 99.29%. Attitude scores averaged 29.00 (96.66% of maximum), with 95.93-98.76% of participants showing positive or very positive attitudes. The average practice score was 26.00 (86.66% of maximum), with notable gaps in seeking psychological support (28.27% negative responses) and lifestyle adjustments (41.34% negative responses). Pearson correlation analysis revealed positive associations between knowledge and attitude (r = 0.227, p < 0.001), and attitude and practice (r = 0.111, p = 0.008). Multivariable analysis found homemakers showed better practices compared to employed individuals (OR = 9.667, 95% CI = 2.483-37.643, p = 0.001), while those with \"other\" employment status had lower odds of practice (OR = 0.437, 95% CI = 0.206-0.927, p = 0.031). Patients with Stage II or III tumors had lower odds of practice compared to Stage I tumors (OR = 0.273, 95% CI = 0.110-0.677, p = 0.005; OR = 0.157, 95% CI = 0.060-0.410, p < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the importance of addressing gaps between knowledge, attitudes, and practices in BC patients undergoing postoperative recovery. Tailored interventions focusing on specific barriers identified in practice behaviors, such as seeking psychological support and lifestyle adjustments, are crucial to enhance overall postoperative care and improve health outcomes for BC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"1923-1934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11989584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S506429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To comprehensively assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of Chinese breast cancer (BC) patients regarding postoperative self-management (POSM) and identify factors influencing self-management behaviors.
Methods: Questionnaire surveys were administered to BC patients who underwent surgery. A total of 566 participants (98.94% female), mainly from rural areas (65.55%) and married (97.53%), were included. Knowledge was measured using 10 questions (score range: 0-20), attitude with 6 questions (score range: 6-30), and practice with 7 questions (score range: 6-30). Scores were categorized as inadequate (0%-39.99%), moderate (40%-70%), or satisfactory (>70% of maximum score). Demographic data were collected, and statistical analyses, including T-tests, ANOVA, non-parametric tests, and Spearman correlation, were used for comparisons and associations.
Results: The average knowledge score was 20.00 (100% of the maximum score), with correct answer rates ranging from 92.58% to 99.29%. Attitude scores averaged 29.00 (96.66% of maximum), with 95.93-98.76% of participants showing positive or very positive attitudes. The average practice score was 26.00 (86.66% of maximum), with notable gaps in seeking psychological support (28.27% negative responses) and lifestyle adjustments (41.34% negative responses). Pearson correlation analysis revealed positive associations between knowledge and attitude (r = 0.227, p < 0.001), and attitude and practice (r = 0.111, p = 0.008). Multivariable analysis found homemakers showed better practices compared to employed individuals (OR = 9.667, 95% CI = 2.483-37.643, p = 0.001), while those with "other" employment status had lower odds of practice (OR = 0.437, 95% CI = 0.206-0.927, p = 0.031). Patients with Stage II or III tumors had lower odds of practice compared to Stage I tumors (OR = 0.273, 95% CI = 0.110-0.677, p = 0.005; OR = 0.157, 95% CI = 0.060-0.410, p < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of addressing gaps between knowledge, attitudes, and practices in BC patients undergoing postoperative recovery. Tailored interventions focusing on specific barriers identified in practice behaviors, such as seeking psychological support and lifestyle adjustments, are crucial to enhance overall postoperative care and improve health outcomes for BC patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.