Cost-effectiveness of expanding the target population of biennial screening for breast cancer from ages 50-69 to 45 and/or 74: A cohort modelling study in the Finnish setting.

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Filip Siegfrids, Sirpa Heinävaara, Tytti Sarkeala, Laura Niinikoski, Juha Laine
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of expanding the target population of biennial screening for breast cancer from ages 50-69 to 45 and/or 74: A cohort modelling study in the Finnish setting.","authors":"Filip Siegfrids, Sirpa Heinävaara, Tytti Sarkeala, Laura Niinikoski, Juha Laine","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00628-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Within Finland's breast cancer screening program, all women aged 50-69 are invited to biennial screening. Current European guidelines recommend screening in ages 45-49 and 70-74 conditional upon, inter alia, demonstrated context-specific cost-effectiveness. This study aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of expanding the target population of biennial screening to ages 45 and/or 74, compared to the current national breast cancer screening strategy, in the Finnish setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Screening strategies' costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY), aggregated over a lifetime horizon for the population simulated through a decision-analytic model, allow for comparison through incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The model, using a Markov cohort simulation approach, was adapted to the cancer stage classification system used by the Finnish Cancer Registry (FCR) and calibrated to observed metrics in the Finnish female population. The analysis was conducted from a limited societal perspective, using a discount rate of 3% for costs and outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess decision uncertainty, using an implicit willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold range of €25 000-50 000 per incremental QALY.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the current national screening strategy, both strategies with a starting age of 45 were cost-effective at the WTP-threshold of €50 000 per incremental QALY. Biennial screening in ages 45-69 was also cost-effective at €25 000 per QALY and demonstrated the highest probability of cost-effectiveness of all screening strategies over the whole WTP-threshold range of €25 000-50 000 per QALY. Biennial screening in ages 50-74 was dominated by all strategies over the threshold range.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Expanding the national screening strategy target population age is likely to produce net health benefits to acceptable costs, insofar as women aged 45-49 are covered by the expansion. Only expanding the target population to age 74 is unlikely to be cost-effective, given a WTP-threshold range of €25 000-50 000 per incremental QALY.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11987236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00628-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Within Finland's breast cancer screening program, all women aged 50-69 are invited to biennial screening. Current European guidelines recommend screening in ages 45-49 and 70-74 conditional upon, inter alia, demonstrated context-specific cost-effectiveness. This study aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of expanding the target population of biennial screening to ages 45 and/or 74, compared to the current national breast cancer screening strategy, in the Finnish setting.

Methods: Screening strategies' costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY), aggregated over a lifetime horizon for the population simulated through a decision-analytic model, allow for comparison through incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The model, using a Markov cohort simulation approach, was adapted to the cancer stage classification system used by the Finnish Cancer Registry (FCR) and calibrated to observed metrics in the Finnish female population. The analysis was conducted from a limited societal perspective, using a discount rate of 3% for costs and outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess decision uncertainty, using an implicit willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold range of €25 000-50 000 per incremental QALY.

Results: Compared to the current national screening strategy, both strategies with a starting age of 45 were cost-effective at the WTP-threshold of €50 000 per incremental QALY. Biennial screening in ages 45-69 was also cost-effective at €25 000 per QALY and demonstrated the highest probability of cost-effectiveness of all screening strategies over the whole WTP-threshold range of €25 000-50 000 per QALY. Biennial screening in ages 50-74 was dominated by all strategies over the threshold range.

Conclusions: Expanding the national screening strategy target population age is likely to produce net health benefits to acceptable costs, insofar as women aged 45-49 are covered by the expansion. Only expanding the target population to age 74 is unlikely to be cost-effective, given a WTP-threshold range of €25 000-50 000 per incremental QALY.

将乳腺癌两年一次筛查的目标人群从50-69岁扩大到45岁和/或74岁的成本效益:芬兰的一项队列模型研究
背景:在芬兰的乳腺癌筛查项目中,所有年龄在50-69岁的女性都被邀请参加两年一次的筛查。目前的欧洲指南建议在45-49岁和70-74岁年龄段进行筛查,条件是,除其他外,证明具体情况的成本效益。本研究旨在确定与芬兰目前的国家乳腺癌筛查策略相比,将两年一次筛查的目标人群扩大到45岁和/或74岁的成本效益。方法:筛选策略的成本和质量调整生命年(QALY),通过决策分析模型模拟人群的整个生命周期,允许通过增量成本-效果比进行比较。该模型采用马尔科夫队列模拟方法,适用于芬兰癌症登记处(FCR)使用的癌症分期分类系统,并根据芬兰女性人群中观察到的指标进行校准。该分析是从有限的社会角度进行的,对成本和结果使用3%的贴现率。采用隐性支付意愿(WTP)阈值范围为每个增量QALY 25,000 - 50,000欧元,进行敏感性分析以评估决策不确定性。结果:与目前的国家筛查策略相比,起始年龄为45岁的两种策略在wtp阈值为每增量QALY 50,000欧元时具有成本效益。45-69岁的两年期筛查也具有成本效益,每个QALY为25,000欧元,并且在每个QALY为25,000 - 50,000欧元的整个wtp阈值范围内,所有筛查策略的成本效益概率最高。在50-74岁的人群中,所有策略在阈值范围内都占主导地位。结论:扩大国家筛查战略目标人口年龄可能产生可接受成本的净健康效益,只要45-49岁的妇女被扩大。仅将目标人口扩大到74岁不太可能具有成本效益,因为每个增量QALY的wtp阈值范围为25,000 - 50,000欧元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信