Outcomes of Invasive Aspergillosis in Liver Transplant Recipients From an Institution Using Targeted Antifungal Prophylaxis and an Antifungal Stewardship Program.
Brennan Collis, Karen Urbancic, Jack Whitelaw, Gemma Reynolds, Sara Vogrin, Hossein Jahanabadi, Dinesh Pandey, Marie Sinclair, Avik Majumdar, Adam Testro, Jason A Trubiano, Olivia C Smibert
{"title":"Outcomes of Invasive Aspergillosis in Liver Transplant Recipients From an Institution Using Targeted Antifungal Prophylaxis and an Antifungal Stewardship Program.","authors":"Brennan Collis, Karen Urbancic, Jack Whitelaw, Gemma Reynolds, Sara Vogrin, Hossein Jahanabadi, Dinesh Pandey, Marie Sinclair, Avik Majumdar, Adam Testro, Jason A Trubiano, Olivia C Smibert","doi":"10.1111/tid.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent evidence suggests liver transplant recipients (LiTRs) with invasive aspergillosis (IA) have lower rates of dissemination and mortality compared to historical data. However, contemporary data from other centers remain scarce. We aimed to evaluate modern IA outcomes at our institution, where targeted perioperative echinocandin prophylaxis and an active antifungal stewardship program (AFSP) have been implemented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent liver transplantation between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2022. During the study period, targeted anidulafungin perioperative prophylaxis was administered to patients considered high-risk for invasive fungal infection (IFI), and a multidisciplinary AFSP assisted with IFI diagnosis and management. Patients with proven and probable IA diagnosed post-operatively were identified using internationally accepted definitions. The primary outcomes were IA dissemination and 1-year all-cause mortality rates. Data were extracted from the electronic medical record and descriptive summary statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six patients (6/377, 1.6%) met the inclusion criteria. Patients with IA were significantly more likely to be colonized with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms compared to those without IA (50.0% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.006). The median time to IA diagnosis was 22 days post-transplant (IQR 5-109). No cases of dissemination were observed. One-year all-cause mortality was 16.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consistent with contemporary data, LiTRs had lower IA dissemination and mortality rates compared to earlier studies. These improved outcomes likely reflect a combination of modern advancements in liver transplantation, and we highlight two potentially modifiable interventions; targeted echinocandin prophylaxis and an AFSP. Further studies are needed to support their broader implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70046"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recent evidence suggests liver transplant recipients (LiTRs) with invasive aspergillosis (IA) have lower rates of dissemination and mortality compared to historical data. However, contemporary data from other centers remain scarce. We aimed to evaluate modern IA outcomes at our institution, where targeted perioperative echinocandin prophylaxis and an active antifungal stewardship program (AFSP) have been implemented.
Methods: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent liver transplantation between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2022. During the study period, targeted anidulafungin perioperative prophylaxis was administered to patients considered high-risk for invasive fungal infection (IFI), and a multidisciplinary AFSP assisted with IFI diagnosis and management. Patients with proven and probable IA diagnosed post-operatively were identified using internationally accepted definitions. The primary outcomes were IA dissemination and 1-year all-cause mortality rates. Data were extracted from the electronic medical record and descriptive summary statistics were performed.
Results: Six patients (6/377, 1.6%) met the inclusion criteria. Patients with IA were significantly more likely to be colonized with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms compared to those without IA (50.0% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.006). The median time to IA diagnosis was 22 days post-transplant (IQR 5-109). No cases of dissemination were observed. One-year all-cause mortality was 16.7%.
Conclusion: Consistent with contemporary data, LiTRs had lower IA dissemination and mortality rates compared to earlier studies. These improved outcomes likely reflect a combination of modern advancements in liver transplantation, and we highlight two potentially modifiable interventions; targeted echinocandin prophylaxis and an AFSP. Further studies are needed to support their broader implementation.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.