A Mechanistic study assessing difficulty discontinuing chronic hypnotic use.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Timothy Roehrs, Gail Koshorek, Mohammad Sibai, Aisha Tabor, Luisa Bazan, Thomas Roth
{"title":"A Mechanistic study assessing difficulty discontinuing chronic hypnotic use.","authors":"Timothy Roehrs, Gail Koshorek, Mohammad Sibai, Aisha Tabor, Luisa Bazan, Thomas Roth","doi":"10.1007/s00213-025-06799-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The abuse liability of chronic hypnotic use remains a clinical concern.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study assessed 1) whether there would be greater difficulty discontinuing chronic hypnotic use for people with insomnia and hyperarousal vs those with insomnia but without hyperarousal and 2) whether those seeking to discontinue chronic hypnotic use of the receptor non-specific hypnotic eszopiclone would have more difficulty than those discontinuing the receptor specific zolpidem XR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DSM-V diagnosed insomnia participants, aged 23-61 yrs, (n = 41, 36 females), with no other sleep disorders, unstable medical or psychiatric diseases or drug dependency completed the trial. Following a screening nocturnal polysomnogram (NPSG) participants were randomized to zolpidem XR (12.5 mg), eszopiclone (3 mg), or placebo nightly for 6 months. After 6 months nightly use, over a 2-week discontinuation, they were instructed to discontinue their hypnotic use, but, if necessary, to self-administer before sleep either 1, 2, or 3 capsules, each packaged separately in envelopes labeled 1, 2, and 3, containing their assigned \"blinded\" medication or placebo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 14 nights 21 participants took zero (51%) capsules and among the 20 taking capsules the median total number chosen was 3. Those people with insomnia and hyperarousal vs those with insomnia but not hyperarousal had more difficulty discontinuing chronic hypnotic use (aim 1) as did those using eszopiclone vs zolpidem or placebo (aim 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most subjects discontinued hypnotic use and among the few continuing to use their use declined from week one to week two of the discontinuation period.</p>","PeriodicalId":20783,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-025-06799-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: The abuse liability of chronic hypnotic use remains a clinical concern.

Objectives: This study assessed 1) whether there would be greater difficulty discontinuing chronic hypnotic use for people with insomnia and hyperarousal vs those with insomnia but without hyperarousal and 2) whether those seeking to discontinue chronic hypnotic use of the receptor non-specific hypnotic eszopiclone would have more difficulty than those discontinuing the receptor specific zolpidem XR.

Methods: DSM-V diagnosed insomnia participants, aged 23-61 yrs, (n = 41, 36 females), with no other sleep disorders, unstable medical or psychiatric diseases or drug dependency completed the trial. Following a screening nocturnal polysomnogram (NPSG) participants were randomized to zolpidem XR (12.5 mg), eszopiclone (3 mg), or placebo nightly for 6 months. After 6 months nightly use, over a 2-week discontinuation, they were instructed to discontinue their hypnotic use, but, if necessary, to self-administer before sleep either 1, 2, or 3 capsules, each packaged separately in envelopes labeled 1, 2, and 3, containing their assigned "blinded" medication or placebo.

Results: Over the 14 nights 21 participants took zero (51%) capsules and among the 20 taking capsules the median total number chosen was 3. Those people with insomnia and hyperarousal vs those with insomnia but not hyperarousal had more difficulty discontinuing chronic hypnotic use (aim 1) as did those using eszopiclone vs zolpidem or placebo (aim 2).

Conclusions: Most subjects discontinued hypnotic use and among the few continuing to use their use declined from week one to week two of the discontinuation period.

一项评估停止慢性催眠使用困难的机制研究。
理由:长期使用催眠药的滥用责任仍然是一个临床问题。目的:本研究评估1)是否有失眠和高觉醒的人比有失眠但没有高觉醒的人更难以停止使用慢性催眠药物;2)那些寻求停止慢性催眠药物使用受体非特异性的艾司佐匹克隆的人是否比停止受体特异性的唑吡坦XR的人更困难。方法:DSM-V诊断为失眠的参与者,年龄23-61岁,(n = 41,36名女性),无其他睡眠障碍、不稳定的医学或精神疾病或药物依赖完成试验。在进行夜间多导睡眠图(NPSG)筛查后,参与者被随机分配到唑吡坦XR (12.5 mg)、艾司佐匹克隆(3 mg)或安慰剂组,持续6个月。在6个月的夜间使用后,在停药两周后,他们被指示停止使用催眠药物,但如果有必要,他们在睡觉前自行服用1、2或3粒胶囊,每粒胶囊分别包装在标有1、2和3的信封里,里面装着他们指定的“盲法”药物或安慰剂。结果:在14晚中,21名参与者没有服用胶囊(51%),在20名服用胶囊的参与者中,选择的中位数总数为3。那些有失眠和过度觉醒的人比那些有失眠但没有过度觉醒的人更难停止使用慢性催眠(目标1),就像那些使用艾司佐匹克隆的人比使用唑吡坦或安慰剂的人(目标2)一样。结论:大多数受试者停止使用催眠药物,少数继续使用催眠药物的受试者在停药期的第一周至第二周使用催眠药物的人数下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology
Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
257
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Behavioural Pharmacology Society (EBPS) Psychopharmacology is an international journal that covers the broad topic of elucidating mechanisms by which drugs affect behavior. The scope of the journal encompasses the following fields: Human Psychopharmacology: Experimental This section includes manuscripts describing the effects of drugs on mood, behavior, cognition and physiology in humans. The journal encourages submissions that involve brain imaging, genetics, neuroendocrinology, and developmental topics. Usually manuscripts in this section describe studies conducted under controlled conditions, but occasionally descriptive or observational studies are also considered. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Translational This section comprises studies addressing the broad intersection of drugs and psychiatric illness. This includes not only clinical trials and studies of drug usage and metabolism, drug surveillance, and pharmacoepidemiology, but also work utilizing the entire range of clinically relevant methodologies, including neuroimaging, pharmacogenetics, cognitive science, biomarkers, and others. Work directed toward the translation of preclinical to clinical knowledge is especially encouraged. The key feature of submissions to this section is that they involve a focus on clinical aspects. Preclinical psychopharmacology: Behavioral and Neural This section considers reports on the effects of compounds with defined chemical structures on any aspect of behavior, in particular when correlated with neurochemical effects, in species other than humans. Manuscripts containing neuroscientific techniques in combination with behavior are welcome. We encourage reports of studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action, at the behavioral and molecular levels. Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Translational This section considers manuscripts that enhance the confidence in a central mechanism that could be of therapeutic value for psychiatric or neurological patients, using disease-relevant preclinical models and tests, or that report on preclinical manipulations and challenges that have the potential to be translated to the clinic. Studies aiming at the refinement of preclinical models based upon clinical findings (back-translation) will also be considered. The journal particularly encourages submissions that integrate measures of target tissue exposure, activity on the molecular target and/or modulation of the targeted biochemical pathways. Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Molecular, Genetic and Epigenetic This section focuses on the molecular and cellular actions of neuropharmacological agents / drugs, and the identification / validation of drug targets affecting the CNS in health and disease. We particularly encourage studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action at the molecular level. Manuscripts containing evidence for genetic or epigenetic effects on neurochemistry or behavior are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信