Evaluating Photodynamic Therapy vs. Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Retrospective Study.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-16 DOI:10.1055/a-2542-4969
Tahm Spitznagel, Katrin Fasler, Jay Zoellin, Jeanne Martine Gunzinger, Chiara Sommer, Stephan Kinzl, Daniel Rudolf Muth, Ferhat Turgut, Amr Saad, Matthias Becker, Gabor Mark Somfai, Sandrine Zweifel
{"title":"Evaluating Photodynamic Therapy vs. Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Tahm Spitznagel, Katrin Fasler, Jay Zoellin, Jeanne Martine Gunzinger, Chiara Sommer, Stephan Kinzl, Daniel Rudolf Muth, Ferhat Turgut, Amr Saad, Matthias Becker, Gabor Mark Somfai, Sandrine Zweifel","doi":"10.1055/a-2542-4969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our study aims to compare the efficacy of half-dose photodynamic therapy with verteporfin (PDT) and subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) with regards to subretinal fluid (SRF) resorption, visual acuity (VA), and central subfield thickness (CST).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective multicentre clinical study at the Departments of Ophthalmology at the University Hospital Zurich and Stadtspital Zürich, Switzerland. The study included patients with acute and chronic CSCR who underwent PDT, SML, or both sequentially between June 1, 2020 and December 31, 2023. The primary outcome was the reduction in SRF at three and six months post-treatment. The secondary outcomes included change in CST VA at the same intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of eighty-one eyes were analysed (33 PDT, 35 SML, thirteen combined). SRF reduction was statistically significant at both three and six months in the PDT (p < 0.001) and SML groups (p < 0.001). The combined treatment group showed a significant reduction in SRF only at six months (p = 0.001). At three months, PDT resulted in a significantly greater SRF reduction than the combined group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both PDT and SML demonstrated improvements in SRF, CST and VA, with SML presenting as a comparable alternative, particularly in cases where access to verteporfin is limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":17904,"journal":{"name":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","volume":"242 4","pages":"405-412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2542-4969","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our study aims to compare the efficacy of half-dose photodynamic therapy with verteporfin (PDT) and subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) with regards to subretinal fluid (SRF) resorption, visual acuity (VA), and central subfield thickness (CST).

Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective multicentre clinical study at the Departments of Ophthalmology at the University Hospital Zurich and Stadtspital Zürich, Switzerland. The study included patients with acute and chronic CSCR who underwent PDT, SML, or both sequentially between June 1, 2020 and December 31, 2023. The primary outcome was the reduction in SRF at three and six months post-treatment. The secondary outcomes included change in CST VA at the same intervals.

Results: A total of eighty-one eyes were analysed (33 PDT, 35 SML, thirteen combined). SRF reduction was statistically significant at both three and six months in the PDT (p < 0.001) and SML groups (p < 0.001). The combined treatment group showed a significant reduction in SRF only at six months (p = 0.001). At three months, PDT resulted in a significantly greater SRF reduction than the combined group.

Conclusions: Both PDT and SML demonstrated improvements in SRF, CST and VA, with SML presenting as a comparable alternative, particularly in cases where access to verteporfin is limited.

评价光动力疗法与阈下微脉冲激光治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变:一项回顾性研究。
背景:本研究旨在比较中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSCR)患者使用维替泊芬(PDT)和阈下微脉冲激光(SML)半剂量光动力治疗在视网膜下液(SRF)吸收、视力(VA)和中央亚场厚度(CST)方面的疗效。患者和方法:我们在瑞士苏黎世大学医院和苏黎世城市医院眼科进行了一项回顾性多中心临床研究。该研究包括在2020年6月1日至2023年12月31日期间先后接受PDT、SML或两者的急性和慢性CSCR患者。主要结局是治疗后3个月和6个月SRF的减少。次要结局包括相同时间间隔内CST - VA的变化。结果:共分析了81只眼(PDT 33只,SML 35只,合并13只)。结论:PDT和SML在SRF、CST和VA方面均有改善,SML是一种可比较的替代方案,特别是在使用维替泊芬有限的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
235
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: -Konzentriertes Fachwissen aus Klinik und Praxis: Die entscheidenden Ergebnisse der internationalen Forschung - für Sie auf den Punkt gebracht und kritisch kommentiert, Übersichtsarbeiten zu den maßgeblichen Themen der täglichen Praxis, Top informiert - breite klinische Berichterstattung. -CME-Punkte sammeln mit dem Refresher: Effiziente, CME-zertifizierte Fortbildung, mit dem Refresher, 3 CME-Punkte pro Ausgabe - bis zu 36 CME-Punkte im Jahr!. -Aktuelle Rubriken mit echtem Nutzwert: Kurzreferate zu den wichtigsten Artikeln internationaler Zeitschriften, Schwerpunktthema in jedem Heft: Ausführliche Übersichtsarbeiten zu den wichtigsten Themen der Ophthalmologie – so behalten Sie das gesamte Fach im Blick!, Originalien mit den neuesten Entwicklungen, Übersichten zu den relevanten Themen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信