Consensus Statements on Tinnitus Treatment: A Delphi Study by the Korean Tinnitus Study Group.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Junhui Jeong, Ho Yun Lee, Oak-Sung Choo, Hantai Kim, Kyu-Yup Lee, Jae-Jin Song, Jae-Hyun Seo, Yoon Chan Rah, Jae-Jun Song, Eui-Cheol Nam, Shi Nae Park, In Seok Moon, Hyun Joon Shim
{"title":"Consensus Statements on Tinnitus Treatment: A Delphi Study by the Korean Tinnitus Study Group.","authors":"Junhui Jeong, Ho Yun Lee, Oak-Sung Choo, Hantai Kim, Kyu-Yup Lee, Jae-Jin Song, Jae-Hyun Seo, Yoon Chan Rah, Jae-Jun Song, Eui-Cheol Nam, Shi Nae Park, In Seok Moon, Hyun Joon Shim","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tinnitus is a bothersome condition associated with various mechanisms of action. Although treatment methods vary according to these mechanisms, standardized guidelines would benefit both patients and clinicians. We conducted a Delphi study, a method that collects expert opinions through multiple rounds of questionnaires, to reach a consensus on tinnitus treatment with professional experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-round modified Delphi survey was conducted to develop a clinical consensus on tinnitus treatment. The experts scored each statement on a scale of 1 (highest disagreement) to 9 (highest agreement) for their level of agreement on tinnitus treatment. Consensus was defined when 75% or more of the participants scored 7-9, and 15% or less scored 1-3. To ensure reliability of the responses, the content validity ratio and Kendall's coefficient of concordance were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 19 of 31 statements reached a consensus. All 3 statements reached a consensus regarding the candidates for treatment. Regarding treatment, 3 of 8 statements on medication, 2 of 2 statements on tinnitus retraining therapy/cognitive behavioral therapy, and 5 of 7 statements on auditory rehabilitation reached a positive consensus. Although all 6 statements regarding miscellaneous treatment reached a consensus, most were negatively agreed. For treatment with neuromodulation, none of the 5 statements reached a consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The experts reached a high level of consensus on treatment candidates, tinnitus retraining therapy/cognitive behavioral therapy, and auditory rehabilitation in this modified Delphi study. The results of this study can provide beneficial and practical information for clinicians regarding the treatment of tinnitus.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"40 18","pages":"e75"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e75","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tinnitus is a bothersome condition associated with various mechanisms of action. Although treatment methods vary according to these mechanisms, standardized guidelines would benefit both patients and clinicians. We conducted a Delphi study, a method that collects expert opinions through multiple rounds of questionnaires, to reach a consensus on tinnitus treatment with professional experts.

Methods: A two-round modified Delphi survey was conducted to develop a clinical consensus on tinnitus treatment. The experts scored each statement on a scale of 1 (highest disagreement) to 9 (highest agreement) for their level of agreement on tinnitus treatment. Consensus was defined when 75% or more of the participants scored 7-9, and 15% or less scored 1-3. To ensure reliability of the responses, the content validity ratio and Kendall's coefficient of concordance were evaluated.

Results: Approximately 19 of 31 statements reached a consensus. All 3 statements reached a consensus regarding the candidates for treatment. Regarding treatment, 3 of 8 statements on medication, 2 of 2 statements on tinnitus retraining therapy/cognitive behavioral therapy, and 5 of 7 statements on auditory rehabilitation reached a positive consensus. Although all 6 statements regarding miscellaneous treatment reached a consensus, most were negatively agreed. For treatment with neuromodulation, none of the 5 statements reached a consensus.

Conclusion: The experts reached a high level of consensus on treatment candidates, tinnitus retraining therapy/cognitive behavioral therapy, and auditory rehabilitation in this modified Delphi study. The results of this study can provide beneficial and practical information for clinicians regarding the treatment of tinnitus.

耳鸣治疗的共识声明:韩国耳鸣研究组的德尔菲研究。
背景:耳鸣是一种与多种作用机制相关的令人烦恼的疾病。尽管治疗方法因这些机制而异,但标准化的指导方针将使患者和临床医生都受益。我们采用德尔菲法,即通过多轮问卷收集专家意见的方法,与专业专家就耳鸣治疗达成共识。方法:采用两轮修正德尔菲调查法,形成耳鸣治疗的临床共识。专家们用1分(最不同意)到9分(最同意)来衡量他们对耳鸣治疗的同意程度。当75%或以上的参与者得分为7-9分,15%或以下的参与者得分为1-3分时,就定义了共识。为保证问卷的信度,对问卷的内容效度比和肯德尔协调系数进行了评估。结果:31个陈述中约有19个达成共识。所有三份声明就治疗候选药物达成了共识。在治疗方面,8个陈述中有3个关于药物治疗,2个关于耳鸣再训练治疗/认知行为治疗,7个关于听觉康复的陈述中有5个达成了积极的共识。虽然所有关于杂项处理的6个陈述都达成了共识,但大多数都是否定的。对于神经调节治疗,这5种说法都没有达成共识。结论:在修正的德尔菲研究中,专家们对治疗方案、耳鸣再训练治疗/认知行为治疗和听觉康复达成了高度共识。本研究的结果可以为临床医生提供有关耳鸣治疗的有益和实用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信